User contributions for Eldentyrell
A user with 316 edits. Account created on 25 August 2011.
3 December 2012
- 16:1016:10, 3 December 2012 diff hist −165 Thin Client Security move depth-and-diffuclty to be a subsection of "Block Height vs Depth"
- 16:0916:09, 3 December 2012 diff hist +2,392 Thin Client Security →Depth and Difficulty
1 December 2012
- 12:1812:18, 1 December 2012 diff hist −2 m Thin Client Security →Block Height vs. Depth: fix typo
28 November 2012
- 23:0323:03, 28 November 2012 diff hist −4 Thin Client Security →Unused Output Tree in the Blockchain (UOT): typo
- 23:0023:00, 28 November 2012 diff hist +13 Thin Client Security →Server-Trusting Clients: Make BCCAPI/Electrum empty sections so they appear in the TOC
- 22:5922:59, 28 November 2012 diff hist +228 Thin Client Security →Unused Output Tree in the Blockchain (UOT)
- 22:5422:54, 28 November 2012 diff hist +5 Thin Client Security formatting
- 22:5422:54, 28 November 2012 diff hist +443 N Orphan Block Created page with "An orphan block is a well-formed block which is no longer part of the difficultywise-longest well-formed blockchain. The block reward in an orphaned block is no longer spenda..."
- 22:5122:51, 28 November 2012 diff hist +452 N Chain Reorganization Created page with "The term "blockchain reorganization" is used to refer to the situation where a client discovers a new difficultywise-longest well-formed blockchain which excludes one or more ..."
- 22:4922:49, 28 November 2012 diff hist +219 Thin Client Security mention that all clients use block *depth* to measure liklihood of orphaning
- 22:4722:47, 28 November 2012 diff hist +43 Thin Client Security replace "valid block" with "well-formed block" to avoid confusion of block-well-formedness with transaction-validity
- 22:4522:45, 28 November 2012 diff hist +696 Thin Client Security re-order sections, put height-vs-depth first since it is the fundamental difference between SPV and full-chain validation
- 06:5906:59, 28 November 2012 diff hist +142 Thin Client Security clarify that picocoin is SPV whereas libccoin does not necessarily commit to a specific level of validation
- 06:5606:56, 28 November 2012 diff hist +175 Thin Client Security add picocoin/libccoin to SPV section
11 October 2012
- 02:4402:44, 11 October 2012 diff hist −2 ICBIT Google Authenticator is two-step authentication, not two-factor authentication.
5 August 2012
- 19:4219:42, 5 August 2012 diff hist +113 CaVirtEx No edit summary
- 19:4119:41, 5 August 2012 diff hist +145 BTC-e →History
- 19:3819:38, 5 August 2012 diff hist +2 ICBIT No edit summary
- 19:3719:37, 5 August 2012 diff hist +14 ICBIT No edit summary
- 19:3719:37, 5 August 2012 diff hist +91 ICBIT No edit summary
- 19:3419:34, 5 August 2012 diff hist −1 ICBIT No edit summary
- 19:3419:34, 5 August 2012 diff hist +353 ICBIT No edit summary
24 June 2012
- 22:4722:47, 24 June 2012 diff hist +85 Thin Client Security →Block Height vs. Depth
- 22:4622:46, 24 June 2012 diff hist +720 Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 21:4821:48, 24 June 2012 diff hist +117 Thin Client Security →Unused Output Tree in the Blockchain (UOT)
- 21:4221:42, 24 June 2012 diff hist +271 Thin Client Security →Server-Trusting Clients
18 June 2012
- 06:2406:24, 18 June 2012 diff hist −451 Help:FAQ remove blatant advertising for a paper which presented an idea which was already known
- 06:2306:23, 18 June 2012 diff hist −949 Help:FAQ Er, Bitcoin doesn't "strive" to do anything. It's a protocol.
- 06:2206:22, 18 June 2012 diff hist +896 Help:FAQ restore more deleted material
- 06:2106:21, 18 June 2012 diff hist +427 Help:FAQ Restore deleted material; "recourse" is a common financial adjective; see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recourse_debt
- 06:2006:20, 18 June 2012 diff hist −56 Help:FAQ A transaction without confirmations is not necessarily "valid". It is trivial to create a transaction that attempts to spend coins already spent in the chain -- but this transaction will never receive any confirmations.
1 June 2012
- 19:5519:55, 1 June 2012 diff hist +225 Bit Gold proposal mention that bit-gold is based on quorum-of-network-addresses rather than quorum-of-computing-power
26 May 2012
- 09:3509:35, 26 May 2012 diff hist +20 Exit Address No edit summary
- 09:3409:34, 26 May 2012 diff hist +26 m Exit Address clarify deposits vs. payments
- 09:3009:30, 26 May 2012 diff hist +24 m Exit Address typos, spelling
- 09:2909:29, 26 May 2012 diff hist +11 Exit Address No edit summary
- 09:2709:27, 26 May 2012 diff hist +1,016 N Exit Address add page describing exit addresses and the conflict-of-interest problem they solve
- 09:2309:23, 26 May 2012 diff hist +19 Invoice address No edit summary
4 May 2012
- 20:4720:47, 4 May 2012 diff hist +136 Help:FAQ →Do you have to wait 10 minutes in order to buy or sell things with Bitcoin?
- 06:1806:18, 4 May 2012 diff hist +6 Myths →Point of sale with bitcoins isn't possible because of the 10 minute wait for confirmation
- 06:1706:17, 4 May 2012 diff hist +189 Myths No edit summary
- 06:1406:14, 4 May 2012 diff hist +14 Help:FAQ →Do you have to wait 10 minutes in order to buy or sell things with Bitcoin?
- 06:1406:14, 4 May 2012 diff hist +538 Help:FAQ expand on heretofore-severely-misinterpreted FAQ answer
20 April 2012
- 21:4621:46, 20 April 2012 diff hist +5 Thin Client Security →Other
- 21:4621:46, 20 April 2012 diff hist +332 Thin Client Security →Server-Trusting Clients
15 February 2012
- 04:3804:38, 15 February 2012 diff hist +135 Discouraged block No edit summary
- 04:3604:36, 15 February 2012 diff hist +46 Block Status No edit summary
- 04:3504:35, 15 February 2012 diff hist −46 Satoshi Client Transaction Exchange No edit summary
- 04:3404:34, 15 February 2012 diff hist −26 Satoshi Client Block Exchange →Overview
- 04:3304:33, 15 February 2012 diff hist +19 Hardfork Wishlist No edit summary