User contributions for Lapp0
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
2 March 2015
- 20:3720:37, 2 March 2015 diff hist −139 Thin Client Security Removed link to ambiguous comment
- 06:2306:23, 2 March 2015 diff hist −119 Paper wallet Removed websites promoting and using bad practices
28 February 2015
- 18:1718:17, 28 February 2015 diff hist +76 Talk:Thin Client Security formatting current
- 18:1518:15, 28 February 2015 diff hist +8 m Thin Client Security typo
- 18:1118:11, 28 February 2015 diff hist +5 Talk:Thin Client Security →Major Restructuring
- 18:1118:11, 28 February 2015 diff hist +258 Talk:Thin Client Security →Major Restructuring
- 18:0818:08, 28 February 2015 diff hist −2,793 Thin Client Security Replace "valid" with "irreversible" where appropriate without adding incorrect statements to the article.
27 February 2015
- 19:5519:55, 27 February 2015 diff hist +50 Talk:Paper Wallet (Single Key) →Is there a good reason to omit bitcoinpaperwallet.com from this page?
- 19:5419:54, 27 February 2015 diff hist +241 Talk:Paper Wallet (Single Key) →Is there a good reason to omit bitcoinpaperwallet.com from this page?
- 05:3105:31, 27 February 2015 diff hist −433 Talk:Thin Client Security Undo revision 54657 by Lapp0 (talk)
- 05:3005:30, 27 February 2015 diff hist +433 Talk:Thin Client Security →Major Restructuring: new section
- 05:3005:30, 27 February 2015 diff hist +433 Talk:Thin Client Security →Major Restructuring: new section
- 05:2205:22, 27 February 2015 diff hist −2,730 Thin Client Security Attempted to remove all misuses of terms (especially "valid") and inventions of new terms (full-chain, super-well-formed), etc in order to make the article more sane. If you have any specific grievances, mention it in the talk page before reverting.
- 00:0500:05, 27 February 2015 diff hist −618 Thin Client Security Undo revision 54648 by Eldentyrell (talk) - "Full-chain" isn't common terminology and the use of it makes the article confusing. This hasn't changed in the last few hours.
26 February 2015
- 18:2318:23, 26 February 2015 diff hist −258 Thin Client Security See talk page
- 18:2318:23, 26 February 2015 diff hist +1,054 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 01:0701:07, 26 February 2015 diff hist −258 Thin Client Security Undo revision 54428 by - Transactions don't become more valid with more block preceding it's proof. The vagueness of what Full-chain is should be elaborated on probably explaining it uses SPV proofs.
13 February 2015
- 18:4618:46, 13 February 2015 diff hist +1 Erik Voorhees no way this is current
4 February 2015
- 02:0202:02, 4 February 2015 diff hist −259 Thin Client Security Undo revision 54031 by Eldentyrell (talk) --- Your undo added misspellings and incorrect statements.
25 January 2015
23 January 2015
- 21:0021:00, 23 January 2015 diff hist +7,495 N Best Practices not exhaustive
- 20:5020:50, 23 January 2015 diff hist +21 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Development Risks current
- 20:4920:49, 23 January 2015 diff hist +91 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Development Risks
- 20:4820:48, 23 January 2015 diff hist +2 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Centralized services
- 20:4620:46, 23 January 2015 diff hist +13 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Centralized services
- 20:4420:44, 23 January 2015 diff hist +4 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Wallet Types
- 20:4320:43, 23 January 2015 diff hist +124 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Improper Handling Of Money
- 20:4020:40, 23 January 2015 diff hist +5 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Development Risks
- 20:2520:25, 23 January 2015 diff hist +38 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Improper Handling Of Money
- 20:2520:25, 23 January 2015 diff hist −4 User:Lapp0/Best Practices →Anonymity
- 20:2420:24, 23 January 2015 diff hist +7,201 N User:Lapp0/Best Practices Created page with "Bitcoin is a trustless consensus system with no central authority. When you make a payment and it is confirmed into the blockchain, it is not feasible to have a "chargeback" u..."
19 January 2015
- 22:2822:28, 19 January 2015 diff hist −259 m Thin Client Security invalid transactions aren't considered valid. Transactions don't become more valid with more blocks. A transaction isn't more secure with more blocks before it (height) unless I'm misunderstanding the wording.
18 January 2015
- 00:2000:20, 18 January 2015 diff hist −46 m Software altcoin
17 January 2015
- 10:4310:43, 17 January 2015 diff hist −3 Softfork →Mechanism
12 January 2015
- 17:2417:24, 12 January 2015 diff hist −21 Altcoin typo
- 17:2317:23, 12 January 2015 diff hist +68 Altcoin →Useful Cryptocurrencies
- 17:1717:17, 12 January 2015 diff hist −1 m Softfork more correct
- 13:0013:00, 12 January 2015 diff hist +41 Softfork →Mechanism
- 12:5712:57, 12 January 2015 diff hist +16 m Softfork misworded
- 06:4206:42, 12 January 2015 diff hist +3,705 Softfork added more detail on how softforks work
6 January 2015
- 12:4412:44, 6 January 2015 diff hist 0 ChangeTip →History current
- 02:5902:59, 6 January 2015 diff hist +130 m Btcd vulnerability warning current
26 December 2014
- 16:4416:44, 26 December 2014 diff hist −163 Bitcoin Dice removed bold and icons because they were adlike
- 16:4216:42, 26 December 2014 diff hist −61 Bitcoin Slots removed bolding and icon
21 December 2014
- 14:1714:17, 21 December 2014 diff hist +109 Orphan Block incorrect orphan definition
20 December 2014
- 17:5017:50, 20 December 2014 diff hist +272 Talk:Scalability →satoshiDICE
- 17:4717:47, 20 December 2014 diff hist +803 Talk:Scalability →passively running a full node and other scalability options: new section
19 December 2014
- 10:5910:59, 19 December 2014 diff hist +141 How to import private keys →Import Private key(s)
- 10:3910:39, 19 December 2014 diff hist +200 Proof of Stake proof of stake and proof of work don't determine who signed a transaction, they attempt to solve doublespending.
14 December 2014
- 09:4909:49, 14 December 2014 diff hist +327 Comparison of cryptocurrencies SHA256 isn't a protocol. Protocol was switched to "consensus tool"