Talk:Donation-accepting organizations and projects: Difference between revisions
:When removing all Ripple stuff everywhere on this wiki I also removed a link from this page. It appeared it was inside a big comment area, and User:Human Rights [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Donation-accepting_organizations_and_projects& |
m →Page is filled with scam: Yeah this kind of thing is a magnet for scammers. They have a much stronger incentive to keep the links up than the good guys have to curate the links. If a charity wants to get donations they should do fundraising the same |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:When removing all Ripple stuff everywhere on this wiki I also removed a link from this page. It appeared it was inside a big comment area, and [[User:Human Rights|Human Rights]] [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Donation-accepting_organizations_and_projects&curid=732&diff=67914&oldid=67869 put back the link to ripplepay.com], which I found a bit odd. Not sure what to do with this. See also the [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Donation-accepting_organizations_and_projects&action=history page history] and [[Special:Contributions/Human_Rights]]. | :When removing all Ripple stuff everywhere on this wiki I also removed a link from this page. It appeared it was inside a big comment area, and [[User:Human Rights|Human Rights]] [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Donation-accepting_organizations_and_projects&curid=732&diff=67914&oldid=67869 put back the link to ripplepay.com], which I found a bit odd. Not sure what to do with this. See also the [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Donation-accepting_organizations_and_projects&action=history page history] and [[Special:Contributions/Human_Rights]]. | ||
:Personally I'm fine with deleting the whole page, but I wouldn't mind doing some curation either. There seem to be less than 40 links here. [[User:Furunodo|Furunodo]] ([[User talk:Furunodo|talk]]) 14:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC) | :Personally I'm fine with deleting the whole page, but I wouldn't mind doing some curation either. There seem to be less than 40 links here. [[User:Furunodo|Furunodo]] ([[User talk:Furunodo|talk]]) 14:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah this kind of thing is a magnet for scammers. They have a much stronger incentive to keep the links up than the good guys have to curate the links. If a charity wants to get donations they should do fundraising the same as they normally do. Part of the justification for [[Bitcoin_Wiki_talk:Editing_privileges#Rules|Rule 2]] is that volunteer time isn't wasted by constantly giving editing rights to people who only make a single edit of adding themselves to some big list of services. [[User:Belcher|Belcher]] ([[User talk:Belcher|talk]]) 17:53, 15 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
==== Notability problem ==== | ==== Notability problem ==== |
Revision as of 17:53, 15 June 2020
Page is filled with scam
I just got a private message from the Human Rights Foundation about a scam link on this page. The link itself has been up since Jan 2019 and the same guy User:Human_Rights has been putting up most of the other links on this page. I advocate that we delete this entire page, because obviously the burden of content curation is too high which is why nobody did it. It also can be said to break rule 2. Belcher (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- When removing all Ripple stuff everywhere on this wiki I also removed a link from this page. It appeared it was inside a big comment area, and Human Rights put back the link to ripplepay.com, which I found a bit odd. Not sure what to do with this. See also the page history and Special:Contributions/Human_Rights.
- Personally I'm fine with deleting the whole page, but I wouldn't mind doing some curation either. There seem to be less than 40 links here. Furunodo (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah this kind of thing is a magnet for scammers. They have a much stronger incentive to keep the links up than the good guys have to curate the links. If a charity wants to get donations they should do fundraising the same as they normally do. Part of the justification for Rule 2 is that volunteer time isn't wasted by constantly giving editing rights to people who only make a single edit of adding themselves to some big list of services. Belcher (talk) 17:53, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Notability problem
I have problems with the term 'notable' in
Only notable donation-accepting sites should be added here.
- this excludes announcing newly developed services, which naturally don't have 'notability'.
A solution could be to create another page, or to divide this page into one section with notability and one without. The general problem with this term is, who decides, who has notability and who not?
My use-case is announcing
Roll Your Tasks (RYT) A free browser based task management app for individuals and small groups. Bitcoin donations welcome.
I would like to have a good place for this announcement (Note: currently it is under Trade->Productivity, but it has been deleted once with the justification, that it is not 'trade' in a tight sense).
Hartrock 15:04, 25 September 2011 (GMT)
Can I put link for donation (oviajor.com.br/?page_id=47) to Manoel Lima (respectable) Author from (O Viajor) Book?
Website of author/actor: manoellima.com.br Website of book: oviajor.com.br
Youtube channel from Manoel Lima (book launch on great boostore) youtube.com/watch?v=jPJIokp1IDc
Website from some stores that have the book: Submarino biggest bookstore submarino.com.br/produto/1/21846267/viajor,+o Americanas big bookstore americanas.com.br/produto/7177486/livros/literaturanacional/literaturanacional/livro-viajor-o
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by POPBitcoin (talk • contribs) at 22:47, 26 June 2011
Organizations that provide tax receipts
It would be nice if this page differentiated between organizations that could provide tax receipts and those that cannot. Perhaps a new column in the table would be the best way to do this. The could column list the countries in which the organizations can provide tax receipts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malo (talk • contribs) at 18:30, 6 December 2013
Scam sites
The overwhelming majority of the entries in the Misc section (and a few above it) appear to be scams; spot-checking a few shows most of them are organizations that don't appear to exist outside their one domain, that have no contact information or contact information that is clearly fake. Others appear to be just random spam for commercial sites, several of which don't even appear to accept Bitcoin at all.
In the interest of safety, I've commented out the entire Misc section. If someone has the time, please add 3rd-party sources for everything left, look thru the commented-out sections for ones that may be legitimate, and remove anything that gets added without a source. I will do some of this if I get the time.
--CoJaBo (talk) 03:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Unblock
Hi, I maintained this page, but now I don't seem to have edit privileges :-( I would like to add Wau holand foundation https://www.wauland.de/ --Bytecoyn (talk) 07:39, 7 February 2015 (UTC)