Bitcoin Improvement Proposals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Draft | | Draft | ||
|} | |} | ||
[[Hardfork Wishlist]] | |||
Revision as of 21:53, 3 January 2012
People wishing to submit BIPs, first should propose their idea or document to the mailing list. After discussion they should email Amir Taaki <genjix@riseup.net>. After copy-editing and acceptance, it will be published here.
We are fairly liberal with approving BIPs, and try not to be too involved in decision making on behalf of the community. The exception is in very rare cases of dispute resolution when a decision is contentious and cannot be agreed upon. In those cases, the conservative option will always be preferred.
Having a BIP here does not make it a formally accepted standard until its status becomes Active. For a BIP to become Active requires the mutual consent of the community.
| Number | Title | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BIP Purpose and Guidelines | Amir Taaki | Active |
| 10 | Multi-Sig Transaction Distribution | Alan Reiner | Draft |
| 11 | M-of-N Standard Transactions | Gavin Andresen | Accepted |
| 12 | OP_EVAL | Gavin Andresen | Accepted |
| 13 | Address Format for OP_EVAL | Gavin Andresen | Draft |
| 14 | Protocol Version and User Agent | Amir Taaki, Patrick Strateman | Accepted |
| 15 | Aliases | Amir Taaki | Draft |