Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency created by programmer Satoshi Nakamoto, who also developed the original Bitcoin client. It allows for pseudonymous and secure ownership and transfers of amounts of bitcoins, without relying on any central server to process the transactions or store the accounts.
Bitcoin has no central issuer; instead, the peer-to-peer network regulates Bitcoins, transactions and issuance according to consensus in network software. Bitcoins are issued to various nodes that verify transactions through computing power; it is established that there will be a limited and scheduled release of no more than 21 million BTC worth of coins, which will be fully issued by the year 2140.
- 1 History
- 2 Administration
- 3 Services
- 4 Economics
- 5 Security
- 6 Bitcoin mining
- 7 Concerns
- 8 See Also
- 9 References
- Main article: History of Bitcoin
A cryptographic system for untraceable payments was first described by David Chaum in 1982. In 1990 Chaum extended this system to create the first cryptographic anonymous electronic cash system., which became known as ecash.  In 1998 Wei Dai published a description of an anonymous, distributed electronic cash system which he called "b-money". Around the same time, Nick Szabo created bit gold. Like Bitcoin, Bit gold was a currency system where users would compete to solve a proof of work function, with solutions being cryptographically chained together and published via a distributed property title registry. A variant of Bit gold, called Reusable Proofs of Work, was implemented by Hal Finney.
The Bitcoin network came into existence on 3 January 2009 with the release of the first open-source Bitcoin client, wxBitcoin, and the issuance of the first Bitcoins. A year after, the initial exchange rates for Bitcoin were set by individuals on the bitcointalk forums. The most significant transaction involved a 10,000 BTC pizza. Today, the majority of Bitcoin exchanges occur on the MtGox Bitcoin exchange.
In 2011, Wikileaks, Freenet, Singularity Institute, Internet Archive, Free Software Foundation and others, began to accept donations in Bitcoin. The Electronic Frontier Foundation did so for a while but has since stopped, citing concerns about a lack of legal precedent about new currency systems, and because they "generally don't endorse any type of product or service." Some small businesses had started to adopt Bitcoin. LaCie, a public company, accepts Bitcoin for its Wuala service.
In 2012, BitPay reports of having over 1000 merchants accepting Bitcoin under its payment processing service.
Bitcoin is administered through a decentralized peer-to-peer network. Cryptographic technologies and the peer-to-peer network of computing power enables users to make and verify irreversible, instant online Bitcoin payments, without an obligation to trust and use centralized banking institutions and authorities. Dispute resolution services are not made directly available. Instead it is left to the users to verify and trust the parties they are sending money to through their choice of methods.
Bitcoins are issued according to rules agreed to by the majority of the computing power within the Bitcoin network. The core rules describing the predictable issuance of Bitcoins to its verifying servers, a voluntary and competitive transaction fee system and the hard limit of no more than 21 million BTC issued in total.
Bitcoins are sent and received through software and websites called wallets. They send and confirm transactions to the network through Bitcoin addresses, the identifiers for users' Bitcoin wallets within the network.
Main article: Address
Payments are made to Bitcoin "addresses": human-readable strings of numbers and letters around 33 characters in length, always beginning with the digit 1 or 3, as in the example of 31uEbMgunupShBVTewXjtqbBv5MndwfXhb.
Users obtain new Bitcoin addresses from their Bitcoin software. Creating a new address can be a completely offline process and require no communication with the Bitcoin network.
Transaction fees may be included with any transfer of Bitcoins. As of 2012[update] many transactions are processed in a way which makes no charge for the transaction. For transactions which consume or produce many coins (and therefore have a large data size), a small transaction fee is usually expected.
The network's software confirms a transaction when it records it in a block. Further blocks of transactions confirm it even further. After six confirmations/blocks, a transaction is confirmed beyond reasonable doubt.
The network must store the whole transaction history inside the blockchain, which grows constantly as new records are added and never removed. Nakamoto conceived that as the database became larger, users would desire applications for Bitcoin that didn't store the entire database on their computer. To enable this, the network uses this Merkle tree, the blockchain, to organize the transaction records in such a way that client software can locally delete portions of its own database it knows it will never need, such as earlier transaction records of Bitcoins that have changed ownership multiple times.
Bitcoin has no centralized issuing authority. The network is programmed to increase the money supply as a geometric series until the total number of Bitcoins reaches 21 million BTC. As of October 2012[update] slightly over 10 million of the total 21 million BTC had been created; the current total number created is available online. By 2013 half of the total supply will have been generated, and by 2017, three-quarters will have been generated. To ensure sufficient granularity of the money supply, clients can divide each BTC unit down to eight decimal places (a total of 2.1 × 1015 or 2.1 quadrillion units).
The network as of 2012[update] required over one million times more work for confirming a block and receiving an award (50 BTC as of February 2012[update]) than when the first blocks were confirmed. The network adjusts the difficulty every 2016 blocks based on the time taken to find the previous 2016 blocks such that one block is created roughly every 10 minutes.
Those who chose to put computational and electrical resources toward mining early on had a greater chance at receiving awards for block generations. This served to make available enough processing power to process blocks. Indeed, without miners there are no transactions and the Bitcoin economy comes to a halt.
Prices fluctuate relative to goods and services more than more widely accepted currencies; the price of a Bitcoin is not static.
- Main article: Weaknesses
In the history of bitcoin, there have been a few incidents, caused by problematic as well as malicious transactions. In the worst such incident, and the only one of its type, a person was able to pretend that he had a practically infinite supply of bitcoins, for almost 9 hours.
If multiple different software packages, whose usage becomes widespread on the Bitcoin network, disagree on the protocol and the rules for transactions, this could potentially cause a fork in the block chain, with each faction of users being able to accept only their own version of the history of transactions. This could influence the price of bitcoins.
A global, organized campaign against the currency or the software could also influence the demand for bitcoins, and thus the exchange price.
Bitcoin mining nodes are responsible for managing the Bitcoin network.
Bitcoins are awarded to Bitcoin nodes known as "miners" for the solution to a difficult proof-of-work problem which confirms transactions and prevents double-spending. This incentive, as the Nakamoto white paper describes it, encourages "nodes to support the network, and provides a way to initially distribute coins into circulation, since no central authority issues them."
Nakamoto compared the generation of new coins by expending CPU time and electricity to gold miners expending resources to add gold to circulation.
The node software for the Bitcoin network is based on peer-to-peer networking, digital signatures and cryptographic proof to make and verify transactions. Nodes broadcast transactions to the network, which records them in a public record of all transactions, called the blockchain, after validating them with a proof-of-work system.
Every node in the Bitcoin network collects all the unacknowledged transactions it knows of in a file called a block, which also contains a reference to the previous valid block known to that node. It then appends a nonce value to this previous block and computes the SHA-256 cryptographic hash of the block and the appended nonce value. The node repeats this process until it adds a nonce that allows for the generation of a hash with a value lower than a specified target. Because computers cannot practically reverse the hash function, finding such a nonce is hard and requires on average a predictable amount of repetitious trial and error. This is where the proof-of-work concept comes in to play. When a node finds such a solution, it announces it to the rest of the network. Peers receiving the new solved block validate it by computing the hash and checking that it really starts with the given number of zero bits (i.e., that the hash is within the target). Then they accept it and add it to the chain.
In addition to receiving the pending transactions confirmed in the block, a generating node adds a generate transaction, which awards new Bitcoins to the operator of the node that generated the block. The system sets the payout of this generated transaction according to its defined inflation schedule. The miner that generates a block also receives the fees that users have paid as an incentive to give particular transactions priority for faster confirmation.
The network never creates more than a 50 BTC reward per block and this amount will decrease over time towards zero, such that no more than 21 million BTC will ever exist. As this payout decreases, the incentive for users to run block-generating nodes is intended to change to earning transaction fees.
Bitcoin users often pool computational effort to increase the stability of the collected fees and subsidy they receive.
In order to throttle the creation of blocks, the difficulty of generating new blocks is adjusted over time. If mining output increases or decreases, the difficulty increases or decreases accordingly.
The adjustment is done by changing the threshold that a hash is required to be less than. A lower threshold means fewer possible hashes can be accepted, and thus a higher degree of difficulty. The target rate of block generation is one block every 10 minutes, or 2016 blocks every two weeks. Bitcoin changes the difficulty of finding a valid block every 2016 blocks, using the difficulty that would have been most likely to cause the prior 2016 blocks to have taken two weeks to generate, according to the timestamps on the blocks. Technically, this is done by modeling the generation of Bitcoins as Poisson process. All nodes perform and enforce the same difficulty calculation.
Difficulty is intended as an automatic stabilizer allowing mining for Bitcoins to remain profitable in the long run for the most efficient miners, independently of the fluctuations in demand of Bitcoin in relation to other currencies.
Bitcoins used to be mined through Intel/AMD CPUs. As of 2012[update], mining has gradually moved to GPU and FPGA hardware. ASIC-based hardware for Bitcoin mining has been announced by several manufacturers who intend to ship products from late 2012 to early 2013.
As an investment
Bitcoin describes itself as an experimental digital currency. Reuben Grinberg has noted that Bitcoin's supporters have argued that Bitcoin is neither a security or an investment because it fails to meet the criteria for either category. Although it is a virtual currency, some people see it as an investment or accuse it of being a form of investment fraud known as a Ponzi scheme. A report by the European Central Bank, using the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's definition of a Ponzi scheme, found that the use of bitcoins shares some characteristics with Ponzi schemes, but also has characteristics of its own which contradict several common aspects of Ponzi schemes.
Because transactions are broadcast to the entire network, they are inherently public. Unlike regular banking, which preserves customer privacy by keeping transaction records private, loose transactional privacy is accomplished in Bitcoin by using many unique addresses for every wallet, while at the same time publishing all transactions. As an example, if Alice sends 123.45 BTC to Bob, the network creates a public record that allows anyone to see that 123.45 has been sent from one address to another. However, unless Alice or Bob make their ownership of these addresses known, it is difficult for anyone else to connect the transaction with them. However, if someone connects an address to a user at any point they could follow back a series of transactions as each participant likely knows who paid them and may disclose that information on request or under duress.
In a 2011 letter to Attorney General Eric Holder and the Drug Enforcement Administration, senators Charles Schumer of New York and Joe Manchin of West Virginia called for an investigation into Silk Road and the Bitcoin. Schumer described the use of Bitcoins at Silk Road as a form of money laundering.
In June 2011, Symantec warned about the possibility of botnets engaging in covert "mining" of Bitcoins, consuming computing cycles, using extra electricity and possibly increasing the temperature of the computer. Later that month, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation caught an employee using the company's servers to generate Bitcoins without permission. Some malware also uses the parallel processing capabilities of the GPUs built into many modern-day video cards. In mid August 2011, Bitcoin miner botnets were found; trojans infecting Mac OS X have also been uncovered.
Theft and fraud
On 19 June 2011, a security breach of the Mt.Gox (an acronym for Magic: The Gathering Online Exchange, its original purpose) Bitcoin Exchange caused the price of a Bitcoin to briefly drop to US$0.01 on the Mt.Gox exchange (though it remained unaffected on other exchanges) after a hacker allegedly used credentials from a Mt.Gox auditor's compromised computer to illegally transfer a large number of Bitcoins to him- or herself and sell them all, creating a massive "ask" order at any price. Within minutes the price rebounded to over $15 before Mt.Gox shut down their exchange and canceled all trades that happened during the hacking period. The exchange rate of Bitcoins quickly returned to near pre-crash values. Accounts with the equivalent of more than USD 8,750,000 were affected.
In July 2011, The operator of Bitomat, the third largest Bitcoin exchange, announced that he lost access to his wallet.dat file with about 17,000 BitCoins (roughly equivalent to 220,000 USD at that time). He announced that he would sell the service for the missing amount, aiming to use funds from the sale to refund his customers.
In August 2011, MyBitcoin, one of popular Bitcoin transaction processors, declared that it was hacked, which resulted in it being shut down, with paying 49% on customer deposits, leaving more than 78,000 BitCoins (roughly equivalent to 800,000 USD at that time) unaccounted for.
In early August 2012, a lawsuit was filed in San Francisco court against Bitcoinica, claiming about 460,000 USD from the company. Bitcoinica was hacked twice in 2012, which led to allegations of neglecting the safety of customers' money and cheating them out of withdrawal requests.
In late August 2012, Bitcoin Savings and Trust was shut down by the owner, allegedly leaving around $5.6 million in debts; this led to allegations of the operation being a Ponzi scheme. In September 2012, it was reported that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has started an investigation on the case.
In September 2012, Bitfloor Bitcoin exchange also reported being hacked, with 24,000 BitCoins (roughly equivalent to 250,000 USD) stolen. As a result, Bitfloor suspended operations. The same month, Bitfloor resumed operations, with its founder saying that he reported the theft to FBI, and that he is planning to repay the victims, though the time frame for such repayment is unclear.
In September 2012, the Intra-European Organization of Tax Administrations (IOTA), in Tbilisi, Georgia, held a workshop titled "Auditing Individuals and Legal Entities in the Use of e-Money." The workshop was attended by representatives from 23 countries. Jerry Taylor, IOTA's technical taxation expert, said, "There's an awful lot happening on the Internet environment which is fascinating at the moment and introducing new challenges for auditors when it comes to virtual currency." Bitcoin was mentioned during the workshop.
Matthew Elias, founder of the Cryptocurrency Legal Advocacy Group (CLAG) published "Staying Between the Lines: A Survey of U.S. Income Taxation and its Ramifications on Cryptocurrencies", which discusses "the taxability of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin." CLAG "stressed the importance for taxpayers to determine on their own whether taxes are due on a bitcoin-related transaction based on whether one has "experienced a realization event." Such examples are "when a taxpayer has provided a service in exchange for bitcoins, a realization event has probably occurred, and any gain or loss would likely be calculated using fair market values for the service provided."
Peter Vessenes, Bitcoin Foundation's executive director, said, since the foundation is trying to pay for everything in bitcoin, including salaries, "How do we W-2 someone for their bitcoins? Do we mark-to-market every time a transfer happens? Payroll companies cringe." The Bitcoin Foundation hopes "to push for solid guidance about its legal and tax treatment." Patrick Murck, legal counsel for the Bitcoin Foundation, said he would like "to help regulators understand the technology better so they can make better decisions." Murck said, "Bitcoin has the potential to become much more than a niche currency, but it needs the guidance and understanding of regulators." and "The full potential of bitcoin could be realized through clearer guidelines and a better understanding by financial and tax regulators." and "Part of making that happen is to talk to regulators, the IRS, and tax professionals and helping them understand that bitcoin is not this nefarious thing, it's just software, it's a community, and there's nothing inherently nefarious about either of those things."
- Ron Dorit; Adi Shamir. "Quantitative Analysis of the Full Bitcoin Transaction Graph". Cryptology ePrint Archive. p. 17. http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/584.pdf. Retrieved 18 October 2012. "The Bitcoin system is the best known and most widely used alternative payment scheme,..."
- Koch, Rüdiger. "Bitcoin - a Means for Redistribution of Wealth". Institute for Ethics & Emerging Technologies. http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/koch20120927. Retrieved 27 October 2012. "We’re currently at 50,000 users and a market cap of $100 Million."
- "Market Capitalization". Blockchain.info. http://blockchain.info/charts/market-cap. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
- "Mt.Gox data". Bitcoincharts. http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/mtgoxUSD.html.
- "Physical Bitcoins by Casascius". Casascius Coins. https://www.casascius.com/. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- "Bitbills". Bitbills. http://www.bitbills.com/. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- David Chaum, Blind signatures for untraceable payments, Advances in Cryptology - Crypto '82, Springer-Verlag (1983), 199–203.
- Chaum, David; Fiat, Amos; Naor, Moni. "Untraceable Electronic Cash". Lecture Notes in Computer Science. http://blog.koehntopp.de/uploads/chaum_fiat_naor_ecash.pdf.
- Steven Levy (1994–2012). "E-Money (That's What I Want)". Wired. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/emoney.html.
- Wei Dai (1998). "B-Money". http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt.
- "Bitcoin: The Cryptoanarchists’ Answer to Cash". IEEE Spectrum. http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/bitcoin-the-cryptoanarchists-answer-to-cash/0. "Around the same time, Nick Szabo, a computer scientist who now blogs about law and the history of money, was one of the first to imagine a new digital currency from the ground up. Although many consider his scheme, which he calls “bit gold,” to be a precursor to Bitcoin"
- Nick Szabo. "Bit gold". http://unenumerated.blogspot.co.uk/2005/12/bit-gold.html. "My proposal for bit gold is based on computing a string of bits from a string of challenge bits, using functions called variously "client puzzle function," "proof of work function," or "secure benchmark function.". The resulting string of bits is the proof of work.... The last-created string of bit gold provides the challenge bits for the next-created string."
- Nakamoto, Satoshi (24 May 2009). "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System". http://www.cs.kent.edu/~JAVED/class-P2P12F/papers-2012/PAPER2012-p2p-bitcoin-satoshinakamoto.pdf. Retrieved 14 December 2010Template:Inconsistent citations
- "Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper". http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.general/12588/.
- Satoshi's posts to Cryptography mailing list
- "Block 0 – Bitcoin Block Explorer". http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f.
- "Bitcoin v0.1 released". http://email@example.com/msg10142.html.
- "SourceForge.net: Bitcoin". http://sourceforge.net/news/?group_id=244765.
- "The Rise and Fall of Bitcoin". Wired. http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/. Retrieved 13 October 2012.
- Greenberg, Andy (2011-06-14). "WikiLeaks Asks For Anonymous Bitcoin Donations – Andy Greenberg – The Firewall – Forbes". Blogs.forbes.com. http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/06/14/wikileaks-asks-for-anonymous-bitcoin-donations/. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- "/donate". The Freenet Project. https://freenetproject.org/donate.html. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- SIAI donation page
- Internet Archive donation page
- Other ways to donate
- "EFF and Bitcoin | Electronic Frontier Foundation". Eff.org. 2011-06-14. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/06/eff-and-bitcoin. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- "Secure Online Storage – Backup. Sync. Share. Access Everywhere". Wuala. http://www.wuala.com/en/bitcoin. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
- "BitPay Signs 1,000 Merchants to Accept Bitcoin Payments". American Banker. http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/177_176/bitpay-signs-1000-merchants-to-accept-bitcoin-payments-1052538-1.html. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
- "Bitcoin: The Cryptoanarchists' Answer to Cash". IEEE.org. June 2012. http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/bitcoin-the-cryptoanarchists-answer-to-cash/3. Retrieved 2012-06-05.
- Lowenthal, Thomas (8 June 2011). "Bitcoin: inside the encrypted, peer-to-peer digital currency". Ars Technica. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/06/bitcoin-inside-the-encrypted-peer-to-peer-currency.ars.
- Sponsored by. "Virtual currency: Bits and bob". The Economist. http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/06/virtual-currency. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- Geere, Duncan. "Peer-to-peer currency Bitcoin sidesteps financial institutions (Wired UK)". Wired.co.uk. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-05/16/bitcoin-p2p-currency. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- "Total Number of Bitcoins in Existence". Bitcoin Block Explorer. http://blockexplorer.com/q/totalbc. Retrieved 2012-10-03.
- Nathan Willis (2010-11-10). "Bitcoin: Virtual money created by CPU cycles". LWN.net. http://lwn.net/Articles/414452/.
- "Bitcoin History Stats". http://btcserv.net/bitcoin/history/. Retrieved 12 December 2011. Template:Dead link
- http://www.bitcoinwatch.com/ Bitcoin statistics
- Davis, Joshua (10 November 2011). "The Crypto-Currency". Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/all. Retrieved 11 November 2011.
- "Questions about Bitcoin". Bitcoin forum. 2009-12-10. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=13.msg46#msg46.
- "cbitcoin". https://github.com/MatthewLM/cbitcoin. Retrieved 3 October 2012.
- angry tapir, timothy (23 March 2011). "Google Engineer Releases Open Source Bitcoin Client". Slashdot. http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/03/23/0210207/Google-Engineer-Releases-Open-Source-Bitcoin-Client. Retrieved 2011-05-18.
- Dirk Merkel (10 January 2012). "Bitcoin for beginners: The BitcoinJ API". JavaWorld. http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-01-2012/120110-bitcoin-for-beginners-3.html?page=1. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
- "About Bitcoin Mining". We Use Coins. http://www.weusecoins.com/mining-guide.php. Retrieved 18 October 2012.
- "Bitpay Breaks Daily Volume Record with Butterfly ASIC mining release". Bitcoin Magazine. http://bitcoinmagazine.net/bitpay-breaks-daily-volume-record-with-butterfly-asic-mining-release/.
- Grinberg, Reuben (9 December 2011). "Bitcoin: An Innovative Alternative Digital Currency". SSRN. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1817857. Retrieved 4 December 2012.
- Gustke, Constance (23 November 2011). "The Pros And Cons Of Biting on Bitcoins". CNBC. http://www.cnbc.com/id/45030812/The_Pros_And_Cons_Of_Biting_on_Bitcoins. Retrieved 4 December 2012.
- Chirgwin, Richard (8 June 2011). "US senators draw a bead on Bitcoin". The Register. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/08/bitcoin_under_attack/. Retrieved 14 November 2012.
- O'Leary, Naomi (2 April 2012). "Bitcoin, the City traders' anarchic new toy". Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/04/01/uk-traders-bitcoin-idUKBRE8300JL20120401. Retrieved 14 November 2012.
- "Virtual Currency Schemes". European Central Bank. October 2012. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurrencyschemes201210en.pdf. Retrieved 4 December 2012.
- "Bitcoin: The Cryptoanarchists' Answer to Cash". IEEE.org. June 2012. http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/bitcoin-the-cryptoanarchists-answer-to-cash/0. Retrieved 2012-06-05.
- Fergal Reid and Martin Harrigan (24 July 2011). An Analysis of Anonymity in the Bitcoin System. An Analysis of Anonymity in the Bitcoin System.
- Andy Greenberg (20 April 2011). Crypto Currency. Forbes Magazine.
- Madrigal, Alexis (2011-06-01). "Libertarian Dream? A Site Where You Buy Drugs With Digital Dollars". The Atlantic Monthly. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/06/libertarian-dream-a-site-where-you-buy-drugs-with-digital-dollars/239776/. Retrieved 2011-06-05.
- Reisinger, Don (2011-06-09). "Senators target Bitcoin currency, citing drug sales | The Digital Home – CNET News". News.cnet.com. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20070268-17/senators-target-bitcoin-currency-citing-drug-sales/. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- Olson, Parmy (6 June 2011). "LulzSec Hackers Post Sony Dev. Source Code, Get $7K Donation – Parmy Olson – Disruptors – Forbes". Blogs.forbes.com. http://blogs.forbes.com/parmyolson/2011/06/06/lulzsec-hackers-posts-sony-dev-source-code-get-7k-donation/. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- Staff (12 June 2011). "Silk Road: Not Your Father's Amazon.com". NPR. http://www.npr.org/2011/06/12/137138008/silk-road-not-your-fathers-amazon-com.
- Updated: 17 June 2011 (2011-06-17). "Bitcoin Botnet Mining | Symantec Connect Community". Symantec.com. http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/bitcoin-botnet-mining. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
- "Researchers find malware rigged with Bitcoin miner". ZDNet. 2011-06-29. http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/researchers-find-malware-rigged-with-bitcoin-miner/8934. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
- "ABC employee caught mining for Bitcoins on company servers". The Next Web. 2011-06-23. http://thenextweb.com/au/2011/06/23/abc-employee-caught-mining-for-bitcoins-on-company-servers/. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
- Goodin, Dan (16 August 2011). "Malware mints virtual currency using victim's GPU". http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/16/gpu_bitcoin_brute_forcing/.
- "Infosecurity – Researcher discovers distributed bitcoin cracking trojan malware". Infosecurity-magazine.com. 2011-08-19. http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/view/20211/researcher-discovers-distributed-bitcoin-cracking-trojan-malware/. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
- "Mac OS X Trojan steals processing power to produce Bitcoins – sophos, security, malware, Intego – Vulnerabilities – Security". Techworld. 2011-11-01. http://www.techworld.com.au/article/405849/mac_os_x_trojan_steals_processing_power_produce_bitcoins. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
- Clarification of Mt Gox Compromised Accounts and Major Bitcoin Sell-Off
- YouTube. Bitcoin Report
- Jason Mick, 19 June 2011, Inside the Mega-Hack of Bitcoin: the Full Story, DailyTech
- Timothy B. Lee, 19 June 2011, Bitcoin prices plummet on hacked exchange, Ars Technica
- Mark Karpeles, 20 June 2011, Huge Bitcoin sell off due to a compromised account – rollback, Mt.Gox Support
- Chirgwin, Richard (2011-06-19). "Bitcoin collapses on malicious trade – Mt Gox scrambling to raise the Titanic". The Register. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/19/bitcoin_values_collapse_again/.
- Third Largest Bitcoin Exchange Bitomat Lost Their Wallet, Over 17,000 Bitcoins Missing. SiliconAngle
- MyBitcoin Spokesman Finally Comes Forward: “What Did You Think We Did After the Hack? We Got Shitfaced”. BetaBeat
- Search for Owners of MyBitcoin Loses Steam. BetaBeat
- Bitcoinica users sue for $460k in lost Bitcoins. Arstechnica
- First Bitcoin Lawsuit Filed In San Francisco. IEEE Spectrum
- "Bitcoin ponzi scheme – investors lose $5 million USD in online hedge fund". RT. http://rt.com/usa/news/investors-currency-digital-fund-868/.
- Jeffries, Adrianne. "Suspected multi-million dollar Bitcoin pyramid scheme shuts down, investors revolt". The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/27/3271637/bitcoin-savings-trust-pyramid-scheme-shuts-down.
- Mick, Jason. ""Pirateat40" Makes Off $5.6M USD in BitCoins From Pyramid Scheme". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/Pirateat40+Makes+Off+56M+USD+in+BitCoins+From+Pyramid+Scheme/article25538.htm.
- Bitcoin: How a Virtual Currency Became Real with a $5.6M Fraud. PandoDaily
- Bitcoin 'Pirate' scandal: SEC steps in amid allegations that the whole thing was a Ponzi scheme . The Telegraph
- Bitcoin theft causes Bitfloor exchange to go offline. BBC
- Bitcoin exchange BitFloor suspends operations after $250,000 theft Bitcoin exchange BitFloor suspends operations after $250,000 theft. The Verge
- Bitcoin exchange back online after hack. PCWorld
- Stewart, David D. and Soong Johnston, Stephanie D. (October 29 2012). "2012 TNT 209-4 NEWS ANALYSIS: VIRTUAL CURRENCY: A NEW WORRY FOR TAX ADMINISTRATORS?. (Release Date: OCTOBER 17, 2012) (Doc 2012-21516)". Tax Notes Today 2012 TNT 209-4 (2012 TNT 209-4).