Template talk:Pools

From Bitcoin Wiki
Revision as of 17:39, 24 December 2014 by Newar (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. Newar (talk) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Maybe we should consider grouping them by network share? Active/Defunct only would be okay. I have to think however that most users would prefer to join an established, powerful pool (which is not necessarily a good thing). Taras (talk) 01:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
I agree on active/defunct being enough. We always can link to pages like http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.php (outdated actually...) or organofcorti's blog, as the information on the top pools changes quicker than this wiki is edited. ^^ Newar (talk) 17:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Pools&oldid=53590"