User contributions for Gmaxwell

02:0502:05, 17 November 2018 diff hist +200‎ Craig Wright ‎ new fake signature
02:0302:03, 17 November 2018 diff hist +904‎ Craig Wright ‎ More interesting than all the evidence against wright, is the total absense of evidence in favor of wright.

05:1105:11, 21 June 2017 diff hist +163‎ Talk:Segwit support ‎ found another non-deleted tweet. current

21:1221:12, 20 June 2017 diff hist −5‎ Segwit support ‎ Please not list people as "Core" who do not have any commit there (directly or indirectly) since June 4th 2016 (one year before this page was created). Follow the cuttoff in the comment. :)
21:0421:04, 20 June 2017 diff hist +151‎ Talk:Segwit support ‎ →‎Sleazebag participants: add some cites, too bad many of the most fun tweets-- trying to sell exploits to attack bitcoin, blatering on about ICO gameplans, etc. have been deleted.
20:4820:48, 20 June 2017 diff hist −1‎ m Talk:Segwit support ‎ →‎Sleazebag participants: wiki style external link
20:4720:47, 20 June 2017 diff hist +416‎ Talk:Segwit support ‎ →‎Sleazebag participants: new section

07:1307:13, 15 June 2017 diff hist +92‎ Talk:Segwit support ‎ →‎company list
07:1307:13, 15 June 2017 diff hist +2,073‎ Talk:Segwit support ‎ →‎company list: new section
07:1207:12, 15 June 2017 diff hist −1,649‎ Segwit support ‎ moving company list to the talkpage for now. I've seen no evidence that it is substantively true.

06:5406:54, 12 June 2017 diff hist +24‎ Segwit support ‎ It's fine that some don't have an affiliation listed.
05:1705:17, 12 June 2017 diff hist +2‎ Segwit support ‎ Pavol doesn't work on Core; changing to Trezor I hope this is correct.
05:0605:06, 12 June 2017 diff hist +125‎ Segwit support ‎ on affiliation comment. + rusty on c-lightning
05:0305:03, 12 June 2017 diff hist +367‎ User talk:Giszmo ‎ →‎table: new section

20:1020:10, 11 June 2017 diff hist +217‎ Talk:Segwit support ‎No edit summary
20:0820:08, 11 June 2017 diff hist +1,054‎ Talk:Segwit support ‎ active in column
20:0720:07, 11 June 2017 diff hist −1‎ Segwit support ‎ copy and paste error
20:0020:00, 11 June 2017 diff hist +40‎ Segwit support ‎ italic
19:5719:57, 11 June 2017 diff hist +512‎ Segwit support ‎ looks like random people might end up adding themselves here, so add a criteria to distinguish people. Others should feel free to add other criteria or remove this. I think a year is a generous amount of time.
19:3919:39, 11 June 2017 diff hist +107‎ N Talk:Segwit support ‎ Created page with "Who the heck is flix1? --~~~~"
19:3819:38, 11 June 2017 diff hist +26‎ Segwit support ‎ There is no special access control on this wiki beyond account registration requiring you to get through anti-spam. But ignorant folks on reddit are mistaking this comment as meaning luke-jr somehow controls access to the page.

00:5500:55, 15 March 2017 diff hist +206‎ Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures ‎ This should also apply for the subsidy overflow fixed by BIP-42.
00:5100:51, 15 March 2017 diff hist −124‎ m Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures ‎ Reverted edits by Gmaxwell (talk) to last revision by Harding
00:5000:50, 15 March 2017 diff hist +124‎ Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures ‎ This should also apply for the subsidy overflow fixed by BIP-42.

06:3006:30, 6 July 2016 diff hist +171‎ Scalability ‎ note that this page is hopefully outdated.
06:2406:24, 6 July 2016 diff hist −1,191‎ Scalability ‎ →‎CPU: rm misinformation wrt ed25519. libsecp256k1 is now widely used in Bitcoin-- with options on it's considerably faster than ed25519 donna. The curve Bitcoin uses was specifically constructed for high speed and is very hard to beat in that respect

23:1723:17, 1 February 2016 diff hist +10‎ User:Gmaxwell/alt ideas ‎ outdated information, libsecp256k1 is faster than many ed25519 implementations.

01:5301:53, 22 November 2015 diff hist −77‎ Satoshi Nakamoto ‎ rm silly picture
01:5301:53, 22 November 2015 diff hist −15,821‎ Satoshi Nakamoto ‎ page was full of terrible speculation stated as fact, e.g. claiming the system's creator is known to have a particular number of bitcoins. It's really awful to do this.

Navigation menu