Bitcoin XT: Difference between revisions
Numerous corrections; remove bits about double-spend relaying since it doesn't actually work. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|author=[[Gavin Andresen]]<br/>[[Mike Hearn]] | |author=[[Gavin Andresen]]<br/>[[Mike Hearn]] | ||
|website=[https://bitcoinxt.software bitcoinxt.software] | |website=[https://bitcoinxt.software bitcoinxt.software] | ||
}}'''Bitcoin XT''' is a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] that aims to make transactions reliable, inexpensive, and accessible. It achieved significant support after prematurely adopting [[BIP 0101|BIP 101]], making it an important proponent of the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref>{{cite web|work=[[The Neighbourhood Pool Watch]]|author=[[organofcorti]]|title=BIP101 implementation flaws|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref> | }}'''Bitcoin XT''' is a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] that aims to make transactions reliable, inexpensive, and accessible. It achieved significant notoriety and support after prematurely adopting [[BIP 0101|BIP 101]], making it an important proponent of the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref name="ooc">{{cite web|work=[[The Neighbourhood Pool Watch]]|author=[[organofcorti]]|title=BIP101 implementation flaws|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref> | ||
After the inauguration of [[Wladimir van der Laan]] to the position of [[Core maintainer]], Bitcoin XT was organized{{when}} by [[Gavin Andresen]] and [[Mike Hearn]] to address controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.<ref>{{cite web|work=Medium|title=An XT FAQ|author=[[Mike Hearn|Hearn, Mike]]|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0}}</ref> | After the inauguration of [[Wladimir van der Laan]] to the position of [[Core maintainer]], Bitcoin XT was organized{{when}} by [[Gavin Andresen]] and [[Mike Hearn]] to address controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.<ref>{{cite web|work=Medium|title=An XT FAQ|author=[[Mike Hearn|Hearn, Mike]]|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0}}</ref> | ||
Due to implementing BIP | Due to implementing BIP 0101 in version 0.11.0A, it is now incompatible with the Bitcoin consensus protocol, and when 75% of the last 1000 blocks are observed to have particular version bits set, it ceases enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also adds a few new rules. | ||
Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an [[altcoin]], but due to an unusually large | Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an [[altcoin]], but due to an unusually large economic acceptance it may potentially become a "new Bitcoin" some day. | ||
==Mission statement== | ==Mission statement== | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Miners that side with Bitcoin XT will produce blocks with a new version number.<ref name="avc">{{cite web|title=The Bitcoin XT Fork|work=AVC|author=Wilson, Fred|date=17 August 2015|accessdate=28 August 2015|url=http://avc.com/2015/08/the-bitcoin-xt-fork/}}</ref> This indicates to the rest of the network that they support XT.<ref name="avc"/> When 75% of the last 1000 blocks are new-version blocks, these miners will automatically abandon Bitcoin and begin mining on a new Bitcoin XT blockchain.<ref name="avc"/> This will begin after a waiting period of two weeks in hopes the economy in this time may force anyone who hasn't switched yet to do so.<ref name="avc"/> | Miners that side with Bitcoin XT will produce blocks with a new version number.<ref name="avc">{{cite web|title=The Bitcoin XT Fork|work=AVC|author=Wilson, Fred|date=17 August 2015|accessdate=28 August 2015|url=http://avc.com/2015/08/the-bitcoin-xt-fork/}}</ref> This indicates to the rest of the network that they support XT.<ref name="avc"/> When 75% of the last 1000 blocks are new-version blocks, these miners will automatically abandon Bitcoin and begin mining on a new Bitcoin XT blockchain.<ref name="avc"/> This will begin after a waiting period of two weeks in hopes the economy in this time may force anyone who hasn't switched yet to do so.<ref name="avc"/> | ||
Users and miners running full Bitcoin nodes will reject the XT blockchain starting with | Users and miners running full Bitcoin nodes will reject the XT blockchain starting with the first block that is larger than one megabyte in size, and thus be unaffected provided it fails to achieve economic consensus. | ||
Because there is no end date for the miner vote, it is almost certain that if a single mining pool continues advocating XT for the next ten years, it will eventually be deployed inadvertently.<ref name="ooc"/> | |||
==Users and merchants== | ==Users and merchants== | ||
Revision as of 17:43, 31 August 2015
The identifying marks of an XT client
| Original authors | Gavin Andresen Mike Hearn |
| Website | bitcoinxt.software |
Bitcoin XT is a fork of Bitcoin Core that aims to make transactions reliable, inexpensive, and accessible. It achieved significant notoriety and support after prematurely adopting BIP 101, making it an important proponent of the block size limit controversy.[1]
After the inauguration of Wladimir van der Laan to the position of Core maintainer, Bitcoin XT was organized[when?] by Gavin Andresen and Mike Hearn to address controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.[2]
Due to implementing BIP 0101 in version 0.11.0A, it is now incompatible with the Bitcoin consensus protocol, and when 75% of the last 1000 blocks are observed to have particular version bits set, it ceases enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also adds a few new rules. Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an altcoin, but due to an unusually large economic acceptance it may potentially become a "new Bitcoin" some day.
Mission statement
The XT mission statement defines what the project believes is important: commitment to these principles are what differentiates it from Bitcoin Core.
- Scaling the network up to handle user demand and spam is important, even if that means the network becomes centralised along the way. The idea of a global system used by ordinary people is what motivated many people to support this.
- XT proponents believe unconfirmed transactions are important. Many merchants want or need to accept payments within seconds rather than minutes or hours. XT accepts this fact and does what it can to minimise the risk, then "helps" sellers judge what remains. It is committed to support only "first seen" policies, and will not adopt changes that make unconfirmed transactions riskier.
- Decision making is quick and clear. Decisions are made according to a leadership hierarchy. The XT software encodes decisions that follow the above principles: people who disagree are welcome to use different software, or patch ours. We do not consider writing principled software to be centralising and do not refuse to select reasonable defaults.
You can read more about the code changes in Bitcoin XT.
Block size hard fork
In 2010, a block size limit was introduced into Bitcoin by Satoshi Nakamoto. He added it as a safety measure to prevent miners from spamming large blocks and meant for it to be removed once secure lightweight wallets were developed; however, the spam problem has only gotten worse, and secure lightweight wallets never implemented.
There has been much community debate on this topic. You can read analysis and explanations for why we think raising the block size limit is important here:
- A series of essays by Gavin Andresen
- Why the block size limit must be raised and why the proposed alternative schemes will not work, by Mike Hearn.
Miners
Miners that side with Bitcoin XT will produce blocks with a new version number.[3] This indicates to the rest of the network that they support XT.[3] When 75% of the last 1000 blocks are new-version blocks, these miners will automatically abandon Bitcoin and begin mining on a new Bitcoin XT blockchain.[3] This will begin after a waiting period of two weeks in hopes the economy in this time may force anyone who hasn't switched yet to do so.[3]
Users and miners running full Bitcoin nodes will reject the XT blockchain starting with the first block that is larger than one megabyte in size, and thus be unaffected provided it fails to achieve economic consensus.
Because there is no end date for the miner vote, it is almost certain that if a single mining pool continues advocating XT for the next ten years, it will eventually be deployed inadvertently.[1]
Users and merchants
If insufficient mining hash power runs XT to reach supermajority then nothing will happen. If enough does, XT users will follow a new blockchain and cease to be using and trading bitcoins.
See Also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 organofcorti (27 August 2015). "BIP101 implementation flaws". The Neighbourhood Pool Watch. http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html. Retrieved 27 August 2015.
- ↑ Hearn, Mike (27 August 2015). "An XT FAQ". Medium. https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0. Retrieved 27 August 2015.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Wilson, Fred (17 August 2015). "The Bitcoin XT Fork". AVC. http://avc.com/2015/08/the-bitcoin-xt-fork/. Retrieved 28 August 2015.