User talk:Casascius: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: When it's to the point of making a spoof article, then yes, I would agree that's close to trolling. Please feel free to delete "[[Radial BitCoin]]", its message has already been understood by its intended audience. I'll stop knocking it, and we'll all be happy. [[User:Casascius|Casascius]] 05:09, 22 February 2011 (GMT) | : When it's to the point of making a spoof article, then yes, I would agree that's close to trolling. Please feel free to delete "[[Radial BitCoin]]", its message has already been understood by its intended audience. I'll stop knocking it, and we'll all be happy. [[User:Casascius|Casascius]] 05:09, 22 February 2011 (GMT) | ||
::@MT: sorry, but being neutral does not mean that you have to shut up whenever someone develops a theory that you think is useless and pointless. Casascius's idea of "Radial bitcoin" was ironical, and I do not think that he is trolling more than luke. | |||
::You started this wiki, so you should decide and explain to us what its scope exactly is, and what is out of scope. | |||
::If it turns out that things such as Tonal Bitcoin are NOT out of scope, I will stop participating | |||
::[[User:ThomasV|ThomasV]] 08:32, 23 February 2011 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 08:32, 23 February 2011
Please provide me a BitCoin address so I can reimburse for your change that I appreciate. Luke-jr 20:21, 11 January 2011 (GMT)
Tonal & Radial bitcoins
Hello, I noticed your contributions to the tonal bitcoin page. While it is perfectly fine for you to disagree with tonal bitcoin and to explain how tonal bitcoin may be more confusing than helping for most people, the way you did it was closer to trolling than contributing. The goal of this wiki is to let everyone contribute and provide neutral informations. Anyway has you have proven to be unable to contribute neutral informations about tonal bitcoins, I'd recommend you just ignore this subject. MagicalTux 02:47, 22 February 2011 (GMT)
- When it's to the point of making a spoof article, then yes, I would agree that's close to trolling. Please feel free to delete "Radial BitCoin", its message has already been understood by its intended audience. I'll stop knocking it, and we'll all be happy. Casascius 05:09, 22 February 2011 (GMT)
- @MT: sorry, but being neutral does not mean that you have to shut up whenever someone develops a theory that you think is useless and pointless. Casascius's idea of "Radial bitcoin" was ironical, and I do not think that he is trolling more than luke.
- You started this wiki, so you should decide and explain to us what its scope exactly is, and what is out of scope.
- If it turns out that things such as Tonal Bitcoin are NOT out of scope, I will stop participating
- ThomasV 08:32, 23 February 2011 (GMT)