|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Prior to [[SegWit]], there was a max block size of 1MB. After SegWit, the concept of max block size was removed and replaced with ''max block weight''. The current max block weight is 4MB.
| | #REDIRECT [[Weight units]] |
| | |
| ===Definition of block weight===
| |
| | |
| Normally, each byte in a transaction counts as 4 bytes of block weight. However, if a byte is part of the SegWit witness area, then it receives a ''discount'', and only counts as 1 byte of block weight.
| |
| | |
| For example, let's say that you've previously received 0.5 BTC to SegWit address A, and 0.5 BTC to legacy address B. Now consider a transaction sending both of these amounts to some address C. The data unrelated to the transaction inputs are always non-witness data counted as 4 bytes/byte. In particular, address C doesn't matter, and can be SegWit, non-SegWit, or anything. The input data related to address A will, except for a constant amount of overhead, be witness data counted as 1 byte/byte. The input data related to address B is non-SegWit, and so will be counted as 4 bytes/byte. When we say "input data", we primarily mean the signatures and public keys in the [[Transactions|scriptSig]].
| |
| | |
| ===Conversion to real sizes===
| |
| | |
| It is a common misconception that SegWit somehow makes transactions smaller, but this is incorrect. A 300-byte transaction is 300 bytes on-disk and on-wire. SegWit just ''counts'' those bytes differently toward the 4MB weight limit.
| |
| | |
| The maximum size of a block is nearly equal to the max block weight, so currently 4MB. This is not somehow "made-up" size; the maximum block is '''really''' 4MB on-disk and on-wire. However, this maximum should not usually be reached.
| |
| | |
| The ''typical'' size of a block depends on the make-up of transactions in that block. As of 2017, the average transaction make-up would lead to about 2.3MB typical blocks if all transactions were SegWit transactions.
| |
| | |
| ===Detailed example===
| |
| | |
| Consider this transaction:
| |
| | |
| <pre>0100000000010115e180dc28a2327e687facc33f10f2a20da717e5548406f7ae8b4c8
| |
| 11072f85603000000171600141d7cd6c75c2e86f4cbf98eaed221b30bd9a0b928ffff
| |
| ffff019caef505000000001976a9141d7cd6c75c2e86f4cbf98eaed221b30bd9a0b92
| |
| 888ac02483045022100f764287d3e99b1474da9bec7f7ed236d6c81e793b20c4b5aa1
| |
| f3051b9a7daa63022016a198031d5554dbb855bdbe8534776a4be6958bd8d530dc001
| |
| c32b828f6f0ab0121038262a6c6cec93c2d3ecd6c6072efea86d02ff8e3328bbd0242
| |
| b20af3425990ac00000000</pre>
| |
| | |
| {|
| |
| |-
| |
| ! Data
| |
| ! Description
| |
| ! Raw byte count
| |
| ! Type (multiplier)
| |
| ! Section total weight
| |
| ! Running total weight
| |
| |-
| |
| | <tt>01000000</tt>
| |
| | Version 1
| |
| | 4
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 16
| |
| | 16
| |
| |-
| |
| | <tt>00</tt>
| |
| | SegWit marker
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Witness (1x)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | 17
| |
| |-
| |
| | <tt>01</tt>
| |
| | SegWit flag
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Witness (1x)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | 18
| |
| |-
| |
| | <tt>01</tt>
| |
| | Number of inputs (1)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 4
| |
| | 22
| |
| |-
| |
| | <tt>15..56</tt>
| |
| | Previous output hash
| |
| | 32
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 128
| |
| | 150
| |
| |-
| |
| | <tt>03000000</tt>
| |
| | Previous output index (3)
| |
| | 4
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 16
| |
| | 166
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>17</tt>
| |
| | Script length (23 bytes)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 4
| |
| | 170
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>16..28</tt>
| |
| | Script: P2SH-enclosed P2WPKH witness program
| |
| | 23
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 92
| |
| | 262
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>ffffffff</tt>
| |
| | Sequence
| |
| | 4
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 16
| |
| | 278
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>01</tt>
| |
| | Output count (1)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 4
| |
| | 282
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>9caef50500000000</tt>
| |
| | Output value (0.99987100 BTC)
| |
| | 8
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 32
| |
| | 314
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>19</tt>
| |
| | Output script size (25)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 4
| |
| | 318
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>76..ac</tt>
| |
| | Script: DUP HASH160 0x1d7c... EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG
| |
| | 25
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 100
| |
| | 418
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>02</tt>
| |
| | Number of stack items for input 0 (2)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Witness (1x)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | 419
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>48</tt>
| |
| | Size of stack item 0 (72)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Witness (1x)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | 420
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>304...ab01</tt>
| |
| | Stack item 0, signature
| |
| | 72
| |
| | Witness (1x)
| |
| | 72
| |
| | 492
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>21</tt>
| |
| | Size of stack item 1 (33)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | Witness (1x)
| |
| | 1
| |
| | 493
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>03..ac</tt>
| |
| | Stack item 1, pubkey
| |
| | 33
| |
| | Witness (1x)
| |
| | 33
| |
| | 526
| |
| |-
| |
| |<tt>00000000</tt>
| |
| | Locktime (0)
| |
| | 4
| |
| | Non-witness (4x)
| |
| | 16
| |
| | 542
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| The transaction's '''real size on disk and over the network''' is 218 bytes, the size in bytes of the whole transaction expressed above in hexadecimal. The weight is always greater than the real size, in this case 542 bytes.
| |
| | |
| It is not possible to create exactly-equivalent legacy transactions for SegWit transactions. If BTC is sent to a SegWit address, then it must be spent in a SegWit input. However, for comparison, a similar 1-input, 1-output legacy transaction would be about 191 bytes. The legacy transaction would consume 0.0191% of a 1MB legacy block, while this transaction consumes 0.0136% of a SegWit block, a reduction of 34%. Different transaction types can have much greater reductions.
| |
| | |
| You may notice that the transaction size has increased a little -- 218 bytes vs 191 bytes -- but most/all of the overhead is redundant data which could be removed. For example, if you have the witness, then you can compute the 23-byte P2SH script. If necessary, this data could be removed before transmitting the transactions: this would be a change to the P2P protocol which wouldn't even require a softfork.
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Technical]]
| |