Talk:BIP Draft - Instant Partial Confirmation: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Nibor (talk | contribs)
Editors
118 edits
No edit summary
Taras (talk | contribs)
Editors, Permittors
2,611 edits
m Unsigned comment
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I would think it would be simpler to code if the initial implementation just sent the hash of the transaction and the miners checked it was in their memorypool rather than sending the whole thing and expecting them to add it to the pool. {{unsigned|Nibor|14:27, 1 August 2012}}
Why do you need to send the whole transation to the miner over UDP? You could just send the transaction hash. This is unique and smaller.

Latest revision as of 00:05, 15 August 2014

I would think it would be simpler to code if the initial implementation just sent the hash of the transaction and the miners checked it was in their memorypool rather than sending the whole thing and expecting them to add it to the pool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nibor (talk • contribs) at 14:27, 1 August 2012

Retrieved from "https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_Draft_-_Instant_Partial_Confirmation&oldid=49981"