|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Until further notice, [[User:ripper234|ripper234]] is the maintainer of this page.
| | This page is no longer used and has been archived. You can view [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Wiki_governance&oldid=37377 old versions of the page in the history] |
| | |
| Please visit [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=157857.0 the related forum thread on bitcointalk] to see discussion. Do not make significant changes to this page without reaching a consensus of admins.
| |
| | |
| This article describes the governance of this wiki.
| |
| | |
| = History =
| |
| == Current state ==
| |
| There is a set of six [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&group=sysop users with admin] rights:
| |
| | |
| * [[User:Genjix]]
| |
| * [[User:Kiba]]
| |
| * [[User:MagicalTux]]
| |
| * [[User:Nanotube]]
| |
| * [[User:Sgornick]]
| |
| * [[User:Ripper234]] - Added on March 2013
| |
| | |
| MagicalTux is the only [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Sysops_and_permissions#Bureaucrats beaurocrat], and nobody else is capable of appointing new admins.
| |
| | |
| [[Wiki_admin_nominations|This page]] will contain nominations for new admins, and hopefully some of them will be added in the future.
| |
| | |
| = Core Rules =
| |
| | |
| I (ripper234) consider the rules below as '''official policy''' at this point.
| |
| | |
| They do not replace [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Etiquette standard wiki etiquette], but are rather in place to be used where the etiquette fails. Other users / admins may disagree to these rules - please take up the disagreement to the bitcointalk thread.
| |
| | |
| # Discussions that are not utter rubbish (spam/gibrish) should never be deleted or reverted. [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATonal_Bitcoin&diff=11554&oldid=11522 Example of rule violation].
| |
| # Edits should respect [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view NPOV]. Do not merely revert edits if you disagree with some perspective; instead, try to rephrase the language in a way that does not change the original perspective, while being more agreeable to your own.
| |
| # Avoid [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reverting revert wars], they are unproductive. Seek cooperative solutions and compromises which satisfy everyone. Perfection is not a goal here.
| |
| ## In case of dispute, citations should be brought in to support a POV.
| |
| ## Citations should be "convincing". Quoting a few opinions and prefixing an opinion with "some claim that" is not cause to violate NPOV.
| |
| # No [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring edit wars] are allowed.
| |
| | |
| = Transgression =
| |
| The rules above will only be enforced starting from a particular future date - past "transgressions" are of course not punishable.
| |
| Admins will not be trigger-happy, and any punshiment for breaking the rules can (to some degree) be appealed (recommended medium is posting to bitcointalk).
| |
| | |
| However, rules without a bite are meaningless, and so appropriate measures will be used to enforce this set of rules.
| |
| The measures include warnings, locking articles, temporary bans, and ultimately might include permanent bans.
| |
| | |
| [[category:meta]]
| |
This page is no longer used and has been archived. You can view old versions of the page in the history