|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == NPOV attempts ==
| + | So, we have Namecoin and Devcoin, but not Litecoin? [[User:Newar|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar|talk]]) 18:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
| − | | |
| − | Ripper234 apparently disagrees with the wording of "Bitcoin does not suffer from these "flaws" and therefore does not fall under the "pump and dump" scheme, according to this argument." despite its [[Litecoin#Pump and Dump Scheme|context]]. I've been pondering a way to rephrase it, but not coming up with any good solutions. Anyone else want to take a shot at it? (please don't remove either component of the statement, as they are both relevant to the meaning) --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 02:10, 25 March 2013 (GMT)
| |
Revision as of 18:33, 2 November 2014
So, we have Namecoin and Devcoin, but not Litecoin? Newar (talk) 18:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
