Difference between revisions of "Talk:Key pool"
Alexgenaud (talk | contribs) (formatting numbered bullet points) |
m (Unsigned comment) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
3.a. The 'change' is sent to a random (or cycled) address in the pool without generating a new address (key pair). | 3.a. The 'change' is sent to a random (or cycled) address in the pool without generating a new address (key pair). | ||
| + | {{unsigned|Alexgenaud|15:48, 26 May 2011}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:12, 15 August 2014
I see the advantage being:
1. I backup my wallet 2. I sent some money 3. The 'change' of the transaction is sent to a new address in my pool 4. My harddrive crashes 5. I restore wallet from backup 6. My 'change' is intact because the entire pool was restored.
Concern:
2.b. I make 300 transactions .. 6.b. Have all lost the 'change' to all transactions after the 100th?
Solution:
3.a. The 'change' is sent to a random (or cycled) address in the pool without generating a new address (key pair).
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexgenaud (talk • contribs) at 15:48, 26 May 2011
