User contributions for Eldentyrell
A user with 316 edits. Account created on 25 August 2011.
28 February 2015
- 06:1406:14, 28 February 2015 diff hist +214 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 06:0806:08, 28 February 2015 diff hist +2 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 06:0806:08, 28 February 2015 diff hist +6 Thin Client Security Refine distinction between "acceptance" and "irreversibility"
- 06:0306:03, 28 February 2015 diff hist +2,781 Thin Client Security Replace "valid" with "irreversible" where appropriate (see talk)
- 06:0206:02, 28 February 2015 diff hist +1,269 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
26 February 2015
- 23:2823:28, 26 February 2015 diff hist +87 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 23:2123:21, 26 February 2015 diff hist +43 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 23:1923:19, 26 February 2015 diff hist −7 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 23:1923:19, 26 February 2015 diff hist +618 Thin Client Security As per Luke-Jr: pruned full nodes have processed every block, but afterward discarded (and no longer store) them
- 23:1423:14, 26 February 2015 diff hist +873 Talk:Thin Client Security response to Luke-Jr
- 03:0503:05, 26 February 2015 diff hist +97 Talk:Thin Client Security No edit summary
- 03:0503:05, 26 February 2015 diff hist +1,035 N Talk:Thin Client Security Created page with "Lapp0, please stop deleting my content, which has been on this wiki page for over three years now. If you think it's suddenly no longer true, discuss here first. In particul..."
- 02:5702:57, 26 February 2015 diff hist +258 Thin Client Security Undo revision 54610 by Lapp0 - (difficultywise-)longer chains are harder to forge and therefore more trusted... this is the most basic principle of blockchain consensus.
16 February 2015
- 08:4108:41, 16 February 2015 diff hist +258 Thin Client Security Lapp0: misspellings corrected.
2 February 2015
- 09:0209:02, 2 February 2015 diff hist +259 Thin Client Security Correct, you misunderstood. Difficultywise-longer chain = more work spent on it = harder to forge = greater consensus.
30 March 2014
- 13:2213:22, 30 March 2014 diff hist 0 Hardfork Wishlist →Bug fixes
- 13:0513:05, 30 March 2014 diff hist +180 Hardfork Wishlist add timewarp attack
25 March 2014
- 13:3213:32, 25 March 2014 diff hist −105 Proof of burn Undo revision 45350 by Eldentyrell (talk)
- 06:2606:26, 25 March 2014 diff hist +105 Proof of burn No edit summary
- 06:2606:26, 25 March 2014 diff hist +80 Proof of Stake the tradgedy-of-the-commons issue only comes up if block incentives decline over time
- 06:2306:23, 25 March 2014 diff hist −33 Proof of burn wording
- 06:2206:22, 25 March 2014 diff hist −72 Proof of burn proof of burn requires a proof-of-work chain to bootstrap; it is not a true alternative.
22 March 2014
- 17:5417:54, 22 March 2014 diff hist +73 Hardfork No edit summary
- 17:5317:53, 22 March 2014 diff hist +2,810 Softfork wishlist move softfork-implementable changes from Hardfork_wishlist
- 17:5117:51, 22 March 2014 diff hist −2,266 Hardfork Wishlist move softfork-implementable changes to Softfork_wishlist
- 17:4817:48, 22 March 2014 diff hist +28 Softfork wishlist No edit summary
- 17:4717:47, 22 March 2014 diff hist +439 N Softfork wishlist Created page with "The '''Softfork Wishlist''' is to record changes to Bitcoin that might be desirable, but that will require a "soft" block-chain split (consensus of the miners)...."
- 17:4617:46, 22 March 2014 diff hist +107 Hardfork Wishlist Add link to Softfork_wishlist
- 17:4517:45, 22 March 2014 diff hist +571 N Softfork Created page with "A Softfork is a change to the bitcoin protocol that requires only a majority of the miners upgrade. New transaction types can often be added as softforks, requiring only that..."
- 17:4417:44, 22 March 2014 diff hist +537 N Hardfork Created page with "A Hardfork is a change to the bitcoin protocol that requires all users upgrade. Any alteration to bitcoin which increases the set of valid transactions is a hardfork. Howeve..."
- 17:4117:41, 22 March 2014 diff hist +2 Hardfork Wishlist No edit summary
- 17:4117:41, 22 March 2014 diff hist +11 Hardfork Wishlist No edit summary
- 17:4017:40, 22 March 2014 diff hist +616 Hardfork Wishlist →Transaction behavior changes
- 17:0317:03, 22 March 2014 diff hist +32 Hardfork Wishlist mention that altchain experimentation with difficulty adjustments continues; it's not hopeless, but it's definitely not solved yet either.
- 17:0217:02, 22 March 2014 diff hist −131 Hardfork Wishlist Delete comment about "interested parties…"; the incentive structure there does not work (tragedy of the commons)
- 17:0117:01, 22 March 2014 diff hist +125 Hardfork Wishlist Mention BIP34
- 16:5916:59, 22 March 2014 diff hist +173 Hardfork Wishlist Add privacy section with NIZKPs
- 16:5416:54, 22 March 2014 diff hist +359 Prohibited changes add Demurrage, if only because namecoin is already doing it.
- 16:5116:51, 22 March 2014 diff hist +134 Hardfork Wishlist →Major structural changes
- 16:4716:47, 22 March 2014 diff hist −2 Hardfork Wishlist →Cryptographic changes
- 16:4716:47, 22 March 2014 diff hist +25 Hardfork Wishlist →Cryptographic changes
- 16:4716:47, 22 March 2014 diff hist +2 Hardfork Wishlist →Cryptographic changes
- 16:4616:46, 22 March 2014 diff hist −1 Hardfork Wishlist →Cryptographic changes
- 16:4616:46, 22 March 2014 diff hist +155 Hardfork Wishlist →Cryptographic changes
- 16:4516:45, 22 March 2014 diff hist +133 Hardfork Wishlist not all post-quantum crypto has the same disadvantages as lamport sigs
- 16:4316:43, 22 March 2014 diff hist +335 Hardfork Wishlist make "post-quantum cryptosystem" and "multiple cryptosystems as a hedge" separate items
- 16:4216:42, 22 March 2014 diff hist −2 Hardfork Wishlist gah, I hate wikimedia markup
- 16:4116:41, 22 March 2014 diff hist +59 Hardfork Wishlist add link to post-quantum
8 March 2014
- 13:5413:54, 8 March 2014 diff hist −2 Thin Client Security fix naming
4 December 2013
- 01:3901:39, 4 December 2013 diff hist +192 Thin Client Security restore Electrum