User contributions for Lapp0
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
20 January 2016
- 05:3505:35, 20 January 2016 diff hist −10 Bitcoin XT "unusually" doesn't make sense in this context
- 05:3305:33, 20 January 2016 diff hist +217 Talk:Bitcoin XT No edit summary current
7 January 2016
- 00:5900:59, 7 January 2016 diff hist −64 Bitcoin XT Reverted incorrect statements
3 December 2015
- 04:1204:12, 3 December 2015 diff hist −12 Bitcoin XT "Proponent of controversy" isn't the correct way to phrase this
30 November 2015
- 13:0613:06, 30 November 2015 diff hist +42 Roger Ver No edit summary
21 October 2015
- 00:1700:17, 21 October 2015 diff hist +11 m Softfork typo, rephrasing
- 00:1400:14, 21 October 2015 diff hist +28 Scalability As explained, this page isn't about scaling the Bitcoin network and security concerns, rather scaling an individual Bitcoin client while not considering the effects on the network.
11 September 2015
- 20:1620:16, 11 September 2015 diff hist +239 Block size limit controversy No edit summary
- 20:0920:09, 11 September 2015 diff hist +152 Block size limit controversy Clarified BIP100, BIP10
12 August 2015
- 05:2105:21, 12 August 2015 diff hist +238 Talk:Block size limit controversy No edit summary
- 05:1905:19, 12 August 2015 diff hist +2 Block size limit controversy Moved fee cost to unclear arguments. Centralization argument needs clarification.
- 05:0805:08, 12 August 2015 diff hist +445 Talk:Block size limit controversy No edit summary
- 05:0505:05, 12 August 2015 diff hist +78 Talk:Block size limit controversy forgot signature
- 05:0405:04, 12 August 2015 diff hist +794 Talk:Block size limit controversy No edit summary
- 04:5804:58, 12 August 2015 diff hist −469 Block size limit controversy "Congestion" is a myth. A sufficient fee, as always, will get your transaction confirmed. Higher fees is a valid complaint, but "congestion" is not. Larger blocks cannot prevent the mempool from becoming too large and causing a client to crash.
10 July 2015
- 07:3707:37, 10 July 2015 diff hist +608 m Scalability removed run on sentence, expanded on claim of low cost full nodes, removed mention of time improvements since security shouldn't be discussed in terms of maybe working in the future unless it is explicitly stated as "maybe it will work in the future".
9 July 2015
- 01:3501:35, 9 July 2015 diff hist +159 m Best Practices →Anonymity current
- 01:3201:32, 9 July 2015 diff hist +99 Best Practices →Local Wallets
- 01:2901:29, 9 July 2015 diff hist +18 Best Practices →Local Wallets
- 01:2801:28, 9 July 2015 diff hist −1 Best Practices →Local Wallets
6 July 2015
- 08:0008:00, 6 July 2015 diff hist +15 Softfork →2015 BIP66 Blockchain Fork
- 07:5907:59, 6 July 2015 diff hist +12 Softfork →2015 BIP66 Blockchain Fork
- 07:5607:56, 6 July 2015 diff hist +1,384 Softfork →Security
- 07:3207:32, 6 July 2015 diff hist −4 m Softfork No edit summary
5 July 2015
27 June 2015
- 09:0109:01, 27 June 2015 diff hist +96 Block size limit controversy No edit summary
17 June 2015
- 18:0218:02, 17 June 2015 diff hist −2 Block size limit controversy Probably should be its own section
- 18:0118:01, 17 June 2015 diff hist +410 Block size limit controversy removed SNARKS because they don't require a blocksize increase, added unclear arguments section, moved some notes there
- 17:4917:49, 17 June 2015 diff hist −70 Block size limit controversy removed non-statement
15 June 2015
- 04:1704:17, 15 June 2015 diff hist +57 Scalability rewording, added benefit
- 04:1404:14, 15 June 2015 diff hist +8 Scalability fix broken link
- 04:1304:13, 15 June 2015 diff hist +1,927 Scalability Added other scalability options
- 03:2603:26, 15 June 2015 diff hist −242 Block size limit controversy Satoshi quotes probably belong in the Entities positions section if they belong here at all
13 June 2015
- 10:1010:10, 13 June 2015 diff hist −63 Block size limit controversy Block Sizes being full aren't a reason for a hardfork
1 June 2015
- 15:3515:35, 1 June 2015 diff hist +27 Block size limit controversy →Argument in opposition of increasing the blocksize
- 11:0911:09, 1 June 2015 diff hist +76 Block size limit controversy No edit summary
- 01:1901:19, 1 June 2015 diff hist +886 Block size limit controversy No edit summary
16 March 2015
- 10:1510:15, 16 March 2015 diff hist +521 Address reuse high fees when displaying address balances
15 March 2015
- 01:1301:13, 15 March 2015 diff hist +105 Majority attack No edit summary
12 March 2015
- 18:2018:20, 12 March 2015 diff hist +367 Mastering Bitcoin No edit summary