Talk:Mining pool reward FAQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
content dispute |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Subject to further user comments, i plan to revert the page to this revision. --[[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] 20:25, 26 May 2011 (GMT) | Subject to further user comments, i plan to revert the page to this revision. --[[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] 20:25, 26 May 2011 (GMT) | ||
* That revision contains FUD about pool-hopping on share-based pools (it is not an attack, and is not cheating). The only time pool-hopping creates unfair rewards is when score-based pools are involved. It also discounts as a myth, the fact that share-based pools are disadvantageous to intermittent miners. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 20:32, 26 May 2011 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 20:32, 26 May 2011
Content dispute
I think this revision by holy-fire is the best. https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_pool_reward_FAQ&oldid=8977
all it needs is a citation to the whitepaper describing the pool hopping attack and also a citation to the closing of bitpenny, which is strongly suspected, on statistical grounds, by that pool's operator, of being due to griefing (real-block withholding).
Subject to further user comments, i plan to revert the page to this revision. --Nanotube 20:25, 26 May 2011 (GMT)
- That revision contains FUD about pool-hopping on share-based pools (it is not an attack, and is not cheating). The only time pool-hopping creates unfair rewards is when score-based pools are involved. It also discounts as a myth, the fact that share-based pools are disadvantageous to intermittent miners. --Luke-jr 20:32, 26 May 2011 (GMT)