Talk:ASIC: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Can we consider moving this extensive list of ASICs to a new page? This page could simply describe the technology. We could move [[Mining hardware comparison]] to [[List of mining hardware]]. Then if we wanted we could compile FPGA chips too, for historical completeness. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 17:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | Can we consider moving this extensive list of ASICs to a new page? This page could simply describe the technology. We could move [[Mining hardware comparison]] to [[List of mining hardware]]. Then if we wanted we could compile FPGA chips too, for historical completeness. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 17:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
:That'd be fine by me [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 21:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:01, 11 May 2015
Acknowledgements
Particular acknowledgements, as they have been very helpful stepping stones
- Operatr's list of questionable projects
- xstr8guy's list of questionable projects
- eldentyrell's Process-invariant hardware metric thread
- BitcoinTalk Forum as the vast majority of information and discussion is held there.
TheRealSteve (talk) 02:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Corrections / contributions
Feel free to make corrections and add listings, as long as you can provide some sources. A lot of the data is based on (semi-)official information, leading to things like BitFury's first chip supposedly being much more energy efficient than their second chip, based on claims. That's the sort of thing that should be near the top of things to address.
If you're not sure how the data is organized, just copy/paste from a listing that has what you need, or see Template:Asic for documentation of the template used. TheRealSteve (talk) 13:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Goal of this page
Can we consider moving this extensive list of ASICs to a new page? This page could simply describe the technology. We could move Mining hardware comparison to List of mining hardware. Then if we wanted we could compile FPGA chips too, for historical completeness. Taras (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- That'd be fine by me TheRealSteve (talk) 21:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)