User talk:Lunokhod: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
respond on tonal |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* My comments on [[Tonal Bitcoin]] are not "trolling". They are my opinions, and you can discuss it on the talk page based on the merits. If you delete my comments again from a discuss page, I will ask the administrators to ban your account. That is not acceptable wikipedia behavior [[User:Lunokhod|Lunokhod]] ([[User talk:Lunokhod|talk]]) | * My comments on [[Tonal Bitcoin]] are not "trolling". They are my opinions, and you can discuss it on the talk page based on the merits. If you delete my comments again from a discuss page, I will ask the administrators to ban your account. That is not acceptable wikipedia behavior [[User:Lunokhod|Lunokhod]] ([[User talk:Lunokhod|talk]]) | ||
** The talk page is for discussion, not trolling, which your comments are. I take your deletion of the warning against trolling on the talk page as implicit admission you recognise that to be true, even if you will explicitly deny it. This behaviour is not acceptable. P.S. This is not Wikipedia. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 16:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC) | ** The talk page is for discussion, not trolling, which your comments are. I take your deletion of the warning against trolling on the talk page as implicit admission you recognise that to be true, even if you will explicitly deny it. This behaviour is not acceptable. P.S. This is not Wikipedia. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 16:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
Hi, I got your message on my talk page. I don't think Tonal bitcoin should be deleted - bitcoin is many things to different people, some more niche than others. It is an interesting extension of the historic tonal system to bitcoin, and if some people care enough about it to make it and use it, what's wrong with that? I did talk to Luke about his management of the talk page for tonal, and he has agreed to be less deletion-happy. additionally luke does many helpful things on the wiki, i do not think this issue is cause to get his user account banned. we're all attached to our favorite pet projects, so it is understandable that he might be a little too defensive about it. we can just discuss things like sane adults, sometimes with the help of a mediator if necessary, and keep working together. [[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] ([[User talk:Nanotube|talk]]) 16:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:25, 24 August 2014
Your trolling on Tonal Bitcoin is not appreciated. I suggest you review the wiki's about/policy; particularly make note that:
- "Tonal bitcoin" is Bitcoin, but... - Which is why it is on-topic for the wiki, unlike other altcoins.
- These is almost no information about tonal bitcoin available on the web. - This wiki is just as relevant to the web as any random altcoin website, and this wiki explicitly permits and encourages original content and original research, unlike Wikipedia which is merely an encyclopedia.
If you dislike that the list of alternative cryptocurrencies page is listed in order of market cap, please note that I did explicitly raise my concern that this ordering may not be ideal for the very reason of giving undue sort order to TBC. Feel free to resort the list by some better metric. --Luke-jr (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- My comments on Tonal Bitcoin are not "trolling". They are my opinions, and you can discuss it on the talk page based on the merits. If you delete my comments again from a discuss page, I will ask the administrators to ban your account. That is not acceptable wikipedia behavior Lunokhod (talk)
- The talk page is for discussion, not trolling, which your comments are. I take your deletion of the warning against trolling on the talk page as implicit admission you recognise that to be true, even if you will explicitly deny it. This behaviour is not acceptable. P.S. This is not Wikipedia. --Luke-jr (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I got your message on my talk page. I don't think Tonal bitcoin should be deleted - bitcoin is many things to different people, some more niche than others. It is an interesting extension of the historic tonal system to bitcoin, and if some people care enough about it to make it and use it, what's wrong with that? I did talk to Luke about his management of the talk page for tonal, and he has agreed to be less deletion-happy. additionally luke does many helpful things on the wiki, i do not think this issue is cause to get his user account banned. we're all attached to our favorite pet projects, so it is understandable that he might be a little too defensive about it. we can just discuss things like sane adults, sometimes with the help of a mediator if necessary, and keep working together. Nanotube (talk) 16:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC)