Talk:Comparison of VPS providers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m oops - adding signature |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Reorganizing the list== | |||
The fight to be on top of the list on this page is disappointing. I think the page is already in need of reorganization; perhaps we can sort it by actual popularity. Suggestions? --[[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 00:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Adding IPv6 == | == Adding IPv6 == | ||
Support for IPv6 is a very important transition, both for TOR, and for general internet connectivity. | Support for IPv6 is a very important transition, both for TOR, and for general internet connectivity. |
Revision as of 00:58, 17 August 2014
Reorganizing the list
The fight to be on top of the list on this page is disappointing. I think the page is already in need of reorganization; perhaps we can sort it by actual popularity. Suggestions? --Taras (talk) 00:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Adding IPv6
Support for IPv6 is a very important transition, both for TOR, and for general internet connectivity.
- In Oct 2012, support for TOR clients connecting to relays as well as relays publishing IPv6 addresses and accepting clients connecting over IPv6 had been implemented.
- By Jan 2013, support for exiting to IPv6 destinations had been implemented.
Please see the [TOR on IPv6 roadmap] for additional details regarding TOR and IPv6.
Using IPv6-test.com, I've tested for accessibility to each provider's homepage via IPv6. The following is proposed for satisfying a yes listing critera:
- IPv6-test.com must report a valid AAAA record for provider's homepage.
- IPv6-test.com must be able to load the provider's homepage via IPv6.