Bitcoin Foundation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===California DFI error=== | ===California DFI error=== | ||
In June 2013, the foundation received media attention when it published a letter from the California Department of Financial Institutions requesting that they "cease and desist from conducting the business of money transmission in this state,"<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/06/california_dfi/ |first=Robert |last=McMillan |date=24 June 2013 |accessdate=31 December 2013 |title=California says the Bitcoin Foundation is a money-transferrer |work=Wired}}</ref> and again when it published their detailed response to the regulators.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-foundation-issues-response-to-cease-and-desist-warning/ |title=Bitcoin Foundation issues response to cease and desist warning |date=3 July 2013 |accessdate=31 December 2013 |work=CoinDesk |first=Emily |last=Spaven}}</ref> In November 2013, Patrick Murck, general counsel of the Bitcoin Foundation, testified before a United States Senate committee convened to assess digital currencies, at which the reception of Bitcoin by lawmakers was generally positive.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/for-bitcoin-a-successful-charm-offensive-on-the-hill/2013/11/22/000ed4b0-53b1-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html |title= For Bitcoin, a successful charm offensive on the Hill |date= 23 November 2013 |accessdate= 24 November 2013 |first= Timothy |last= Lee |work= Washington Post}}</ref> | In June 2013, the foundation received media attention when it published a letter from the California Department of Financial Institutions requesting that they "cease and desist from conducting the business of money transmission in this state,"<ref name="wired">{{cite news |url=http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/06/california_dfi/ |first=Robert |last=McMillan |date=24 June 2013 |accessdate=31 December 2013 |title=California says the Bitcoin Foundation is a money-transferrer |work=Wired}}</ref> and again when it published their detailed response to the regulators.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-foundation-issues-response-to-cease-and-desist-warning/ |title=Bitcoin Foundation issues response to cease and desist warning |date=3 July 2013 |accessdate=31 December 2013 |work=CoinDesk |first=Emily |last=Spaven}}</ref> The California DFI had erroneously considered the Bitcoin Foundation to be a money transmitter.<ref name="wired"/> | ||
===United States Senate assessment=== | |||
In November 2013, Patrick Murck, general counsel of the Bitcoin Foundation, testified before a United States Senate committee convened to assess digital currencies, at which the reception of Bitcoin by lawmakers was generally positive.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/for-bitcoin-a-successful-charm-offensive-on-the-hill/2013/11/22/000ed4b0-53b1-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html |title= For Bitcoin, a successful charm offensive on the Hill |date= 23 November 2013 |accessdate= 24 November 2013 |first= Timothy |last= Lee |work= Washington Post}}</ref> | |||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
Revision as of 03:58, 30 July 2015
The Bitcoin Foundation is an American nonprofit corporation. It was founded in September 2012 with the stated mission to "standardize, protect and promote the use of Bitcoin cryptographic money for the benefit of users worldwide."[1] The organization was modeled on the Linux Foundation and is funded mainly through grants made by for-profit companies that depend on the Bitcoin technology.[2] The Foundation and its leadership have been criticized by the media.[3]
History
The Bitcoin Foundation was announced on September 27, 2012.[4]
According to its founding documents, the Bitcoin Foundation's original members included Gavin Andresen, Charlie Shrem, Mark Karpeles, Peter Vessenes, Roger Ver, and Patrick Murck. Current board members are divided into one of three categories: Founding Members, Industry Members, and Individual Members. The board is made up of a combination of elected members of the aforementioned categories.Gavin Andresen is employed by the foundation as "chief scientist."[2]
California DFI error
In June 2013, the foundation received media attention when it published a letter from the California Department of Financial Institutions requesting that they "cease and desist from conducting the business of money transmission in this state,"[5] and again when it published their detailed response to the regulators.[6] The California DFI had erroneously considered the Bitcoin Foundation to be a money transmitter.[5]
United States Senate assessment
In November 2013, Patrick Murck, general counsel of the Bitcoin Foundation, testified before a United States Senate committee convened to assess digital currencies, at which the reception of Bitcoin by lawmakers was generally positive.[7]
External Links
- BitcoinFoundation.org website
References
- ↑ Matonis, Jon (27 September 2012). "Bitcoin Foundation launches to drive bitcoin's advancement". Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmatonis/2012/09/27/bitcoin-foundation-launches-to-drive-bitcoins-advancement/.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Bustillos, Maria (2 April 2013). "The bitcoin boom". The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/the-future-of-bitcoin.html. Retrieved 30 December 2013.
- ↑ Neal, Meghan (May 12, 2014). "Bitcoin is Hiring Lobbyists". http://motherboard.vice.com/read/sorry-cypherpunks-bitcoin-is-hiring-political-lobbyists. Retrieved May 16, 2014.
- ↑ BitcoinTalk thread 113400. [ANN Bitcoin Foundation] 27 September 2012.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 McMillan, Robert (24 June 2013). "California says the Bitcoin Foundation is a money-transferrer". Wired. http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/06/california_dfi/. Retrieved 31 December 2013.
- ↑ Spaven, Emily (3 July 2013). "Bitcoin Foundation issues response to cease and desist warning". CoinDesk. http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-foundation-issues-response-to-cease-and-desist-warning/. Retrieved 31 December 2013.
- ↑ Lee, Timothy (23 November 2013). "For Bitcoin, a successful charm offensive on the Hill". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/for-bitcoin-a-successful-charm-offensive-on-the-hill/2013/11/22/000ed4b0-53b1-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
