Talk:Bitcoin Blender: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Bitblender (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Anything on BitcoinTalk? [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 21:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC) | :Anything on BitcoinTalk? [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 21:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
:As of yet there's exactly zero evidence that you're not running a con. You may recreate this page after we see some testimonials from established BitcoinTalk members. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 15:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | :As of yet there's exactly zero evidence that you're not running a con. You may recreate this page after we see some testimonials from established BitcoinTalk members. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 15:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
Unfortunately there are not any posts on bitcointalk.org except users with 1 post. I can write the same as you wrote but the opposite, as of yet there's exactly zero evidence that I'm running a con, and it is as true as your sentence. If i was a scam, then there would be at least one person reporting on it after running the service for 9 months? Why is a 17 pages long thread with only positive feedback not trustworthy? There are more threads but its all on forums on Tor, no one is saying its a scam, search the internet and look for anyone saying i stole any bitcoins or that the mixer doesn't properly mix the coins and leave 0 taint? Here are some more examples on different forums with different established users discussing Bitcoin Blender in different contexts: | |||
http://lacbzxobeprssrfx.onion/index.php/topic,19583 | |||
http://lacbzxobeprssrfx.onion/index.php/topic,5042 | |||
http://thehub7dnl5nmcz5.onion/index.php?topic=2015 | |||
http://thehub7dnl5nmcz5.onion/index.php?topic=2047 | |||
http://silkroad5v7dywlc.onion/index.php?topic=50868.0 | |||
There is no way i could fake this? | |||
http://silkroad5v7dywlc.onion/index.php?topic=32926.0 | |||
I hope someone knowledgeable would post on bitcointalk.org that they are using/used Bitcoin Blender eventually, it should have happened after running the service for 9 months without any problems, but it has unfortunately not happened yet. I am trying to point traffic to that bitcointalk.org thread by having a link to it from my site for using as discussion but its mostly darknet users so they cant post on bitcointalk.org. | |||
Why am i suddenly being treated as guilty after the page has been up here for 8 months without any scam reports or problems? I have announced my service in the best way I can, without spam or lying, i even my self had the "Caution: This service is operating anonymously. Use at your own discretion." message on the page, would a scammer put that on? | |||
//Bitblender |
Revision as of 22:03, 15 September 2014
Here is a thread with lots of users saying its working. I know its a darknet market forum but its all legit users with 17 pages of posts in the thread.
http://silkroad5v7dywlc.onion/index.php?topic=32926.0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitblender (talk • contribs) at 15:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Anything on BitcoinTalk? Taras (talk) 21:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- As of yet there's exactly zero evidence that you're not running a con. You may recreate this page after we see some testimonials from established BitcoinTalk members. Taras (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately there are not any posts on bitcointalk.org except users with 1 post. I can write the same as you wrote but the opposite, as of yet there's exactly zero evidence that I'm running a con, and it is as true as your sentence. If i was a scam, then there would be at least one person reporting on it after running the service for 9 months? Why is a 17 pages long thread with only positive feedback not trustworthy? There are more threads but its all on forums on Tor, no one is saying its a scam, search the internet and look for anyone saying i stole any bitcoins or that the mixer doesn't properly mix the coins and leave 0 taint? Here are some more examples on different forums with different established users discussing Bitcoin Blender in different contexts: http://lacbzxobeprssrfx.onion/index.php/topic,19583 http://lacbzxobeprssrfx.onion/index.php/topic,5042 http://thehub7dnl5nmcz5.onion/index.php?topic=2015 http://thehub7dnl5nmcz5.onion/index.php?topic=2047 http://silkroad5v7dywlc.onion/index.php?topic=50868.0
There is no way i could fake this? http://silkroad5v7dywlc.onion/index.php?topic=32926.0
I hope someone knowledgeable would post on bitcointalk.org that they are using/used Bitcoin Blender eventually, it should have happened after running the service for 9 months without any problems, but it has unfortunately not happened yet. I am trying to point traffic to that bitcointalk.org thread by having a link to it from my site for using as discussion but its mostly darknet users so they cant post on bitcointalk.org.
Why am i suddenly being treated as guilty after the page has been up here for 8 months without any scam reports or problems? I have announced my service in the best way I can, without spam or lying, i even my self had the "Caution: This service is operating anonymously. Use at your own discretion." message on the page, would a scammer put that on?
//Bitblender