User talk:Sgornick: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(Add response to Vladgiurgiubv.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)== | |||
Trade; 05:20 . . (-71) . . Sgornick (Talk | contribs) (→Getting started: Remove BTCBase, this is wiki is generally for english-only sites. There are separate wikis for other languages.) | Trade; 05:20 . . (-71) . . Sgornick (Talk | contribs) (→Getting started: Remove BTCBase, this is wiki is generally for english-only sites. There are separate wikis for other languages.) | ||
Yet Bitomat is not available in English... what's the difference here? --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT) | Yet Bitomat is not available in English... what's the difference here? --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT) | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
Good point, Luke-jr. Unfortunately, they don't belong on the trade page for another reason -- they are info only, they have no trade. Otherwise I would add them back in somewhere. | Good point, Luke-jr. Unfortunately, they don't belong on the trade page for another reason -- they are info only, they have no trade. Otherwise I would add them back in somewhere. | ||
==13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)== | |||
Mr. Sgornick I thought this was a good idea. I don't understand how it hurts the community?!(I don't see the reasons in deleting them.) I made my contributions (Introduced 4-5 bitcoin-related sites and wrote some descriptions). The users don't have anything to loose and the BTC I make out of this I intend to spend on bitcoindeals.com (after I get an invitation). Isn't there a way I can leave those links there? We have the same rights on this wiki so I hope we can disscus this with respect and consideration. | Mr. Sgornick I thought this was a good idea. I don't understand how it hurts the community?!(I don't see the reasons in deleting them.) I made my contributions (Introduced 4-5 bitcoin-related sites and wrote some descriptions). The users don't have anything to loose and the BTC I make out of this I intend to spend on bitcoindeals.com (after I get an invitation). Isn't there a way I can leave those links there? We have the same rights on this wiki so I hope we can disscus this with respect and consideration. | ||
--[[User:Vladgiurgiubv|Vladgiurgiubv]] 13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT) | --[[User:Vladgiurgiubv|Vladgiurgiubv]] 13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT) | ||
Vladgiurgiubv, It was an unwritten but generally accepted rule that no affiliate / referral links should be included in the wiki for a number of reasons. The [[BitcoinWiki:Rules|[policy]] does now exist though. | |||
Revision as of 21:14, 10 August 2011
06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)
Trade; 05:20 . . (-71) . . Sgornick (Talk | contribs) (→Getting started: Remove BTCBase, this is wiki is generally for english-only sites. There are separate wikis for other languages.)
Yet Bitomat is not available in English... what's the difference here? --Luke-jr 06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)
Good point, Luke-jr. Unfortunately, they don't belong on the trade page for another reason -- they are info only, they have no trade. Otherwise I would add them back in somewhere.
13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)
Mr. Sgornick I thought this was a good idea. I don't understand how it hurts the community?!(I don't see the reasons in deleting them.) I made my contributions (Introduced 4-5 bitcoin-related sites and wrote some descriptions). The users don't have anything to loose and the BTC I make out of this I intend to spend on bitcoindeals.com (after I get an invitation). Isn't there a way I can leave those links there? We have the same rights on this wiki so I hope we can disscus this with respect and consideration. --Vladgiurgiubv 13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)
Vladgiurgiubv, It was an unwritten but generally accepted rule that no affiliate / referral links should be included in the wiki for a number of reasons. The [policy does now exist though.