User talk:TheRealSteve: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs) m →IRC |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==IRC== | |||
Hello fellow member of <span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">Big Gang Mafia</span>, do you ever visit [https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=bitcoin-wiki&uio=d4 this wiki's IRC channel]? It's a nice place for discussion of changes and ideas, and probably the best way to get a hold of the people who handle extensions and usergroups. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 23:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
: haha - well hello there.. 'Vinnie' ..actually I haven't yet, but I'd been contemplating it. Will have to connect one of these days - [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 00:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
:: By the way, I'm not sure if you noticed; there are some social media fields in [[Template:Infobox company]] now. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 13:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
::: I hadn't - there were several edits, but I hadn't looked too closely at it yet. I see how you implemented it - very cool! [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 17:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
==Mining hardware pages== | |||
Hey Steve. Do you think we should make a page for every major model of mining hardware, or would that be too extensive? [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 16:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | Hey Steve. Do you think we should make a page for every major model of mining hardware, or would that be too extensive? [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 16:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I think that would be too extensive for a wiki. Exceptions could be made, though. Have a look at the Avalon pages - they have quite a bit of detail on each model, to the extent of which if they were all placed on a single page, that would become quite a big page. If I were adding mining hardware (completed miners, not chips), I'd add them as a list under the company that manufactured them (as well as on the mining hardware comparison page, of course) until such a time that information available really warrants a separate page. - [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 16:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | :I think that would be too extensive for a wiki. Exceptions could be made, though. Have a look at the Avalon pages - they have quite a bit of detail on each model, to the extent of which if they were all placed on a single page, that would become quite a big page. If I were adding mining hardware (completed miners, not chips), I'd add them as a list under the company that manufactured them (as well as on the mining hardware comparison page, of course) until such a time that information available really warrants a separate page. - [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 16:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:29, 25 March 2015
IRC
Hello fellow member of Big Gang Mafia, do you ever visit this wiki's IRC channel? It's a nice place for discussion of changes and ideas, and probably the best way to get a hold of the people who handle extensions and usergroups. Taras (talk) 23:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- haha - well hello there.. 'Vinnie' ..actually I haven't yet, but I'd been contemplating it. Will have to connect one of these days - TheRealSteve (talk) 00:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- By the way, I'm not sure if you noticed; there are some social media fields in Template:Infobox company now. Taras (talk) 13:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- I hadn't - there were several edits, but I hadn't looked too closely at it yet. I see how you implemented it - very cool! TheRealSteve (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- By the way, I'm not sure if you noticed; there are some social media fields in Template:Infobox company now. Taras (talk) 13:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Mining hardware pages
Hey Steve. Do you think we should make a page for every major model of mining hardware, or would that be too extensive? Taras (talk) 16:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- I think that would be too extensive for a wiki. Exceptions could be made, though. Have a look at the Avalon pages - they have quite a bit of detail on each model, to the extent of which if they were all placed on a single page, that would become quite a big page. If I were adding mining hardware (completed miners, not chips), I'd add them as a list under the company that manufactured them (as well as on the mining hardware comparison page, of course) until such a time that information available really warrants a separate page. - TheRealSteve (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)