User talk:Flix: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (done) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I agree, linking to it from /every single service page/ is a bit much. --[[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] ([[User talk:Nanotube|talk]]) 22:57, 17 January 2013 (GMT) | I agree, linking to it from /every single service page/ is a bit much. --[[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] ([[User talk:Nanotube|talk]]) 22:57, 17 January 2013 (GMT) | ||
Ok. Agree. 18 links maybe too many. I'll remove some. --[[User:Flix|Flix]] ([[User talk:Flix|talk]]) 23:29, 17 January 2013 (GMT) | |||
: Sounds good. I might suggest to link it from other listings-style pages (like 'trade', 'businesses and organizations', and such), rather than from individual service provider pages. That'd be quite sensible. --[[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] ([[User talk:Nanotube|talk]]) 02:05, 18 January 2013 (GMT) | |||
Done. Removed half the links. --[[User:Flix|Flix]] ([[User talk:Flix|talk]]) 09:26, 18 January 2013 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 09:26, 18 January 2013
Not complaining about your Bitcoin Ladder idea, but I'm not sure it should be linked from every listed service's article... Is there a reason behind that? --Luke-jr (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2013 (GMT)
I agree, linking to it from /every single service page/ is a bit much. --Nanotube (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2013 (GMT)
Ok. Agree. 18 links maybe too many. I'll remove some. --Flix (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2013 (GMT)
- Sounds good. I might suggest to link it from other listings-style pages (like 'trade', 'businesses and organizations', and such), rather than from individual service provider pages. That'd be quite sensible. --Nanotube (talk) 02:05, 18 January 2013 (GMT)
Done. Removed half the links. --Flix (talk) 09:26, 18 January 2013 (GMT)