OP CHECKSIG: Difference between revisions
Corrections to the sighash algorithm, and a note that sighash is calculated differently for segwit scripts. |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
OP_CHECKSIG is [[Script|script]] opcode used to verify that the signature for a tx input is valid. OP_CHECKSIG expects two values to be on the stack | ''This article describes the operation of OP_CHECKSIG in non-segwit scripts. The hash digest for OP_CHECKSIG, OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY, OP_CHECKMULTISIG, OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY in segwit scripts is calculated differently, as described in [https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0143.mediawiki BIP 143].'' | ||
'''OP_CHECKSIG''' is [[Script|script]] opcode used to verify that the signature for a tx input is valid. OP_CHECKSIG expects two values to be on the stack. These are, in order of stack depth, the public key and the signature of the script. These two values are normally obtained by running the scriptSig script of the transaction input we are attempting to validate. The scriptSig script is deleted after it is run, but the stack is left as is. Then, the scriptPubKey script from the previous transaction output that is now being spent is run, generally concluding in an OP_CHECKSIG. | |||
The standard scriptPubKey checks that the public key (actually a hash of) is a particular value, and that OP_CHECKSIG passes. | The standard scriptPubKey checks that the public key (actually a hash of) is a particular value, and that OP_CHECKSIG passes. | ||
For normal transaction inputs if the creator of the current transaction can successfully create a ScriptSig signature that uses the right public key for the ScriptPubKey of the transaction output they are attempting to spend, that transaction input is considered valid. | For normal transaction inputs, if the creator of the current transaction can successfully create a ScriptSig signature that uses the right public key for the ScriptPubKey of the transaction output they are attempting to spend, that transaction input is considered valid. | ||
== Parameters == | == Parameters == | ||
In addition to the script code itself | In addition to the stack parameters and the script code itself, in order to operate correctly OP_CHECKSIG needs to know the current transaction and the index of current transaction input. | ||
== How it works == | == How it works == | ||
Firstly always this (the default) procedure is applied: | Firstly always this (the default) procedure is applied: | ||
[[File:Bitcoin_OpCheckSig_InDetail.png|thumb|right|Signature verification process of the default procedure]] | [[File:Bitcoin_OpCheckSig_InDetail.png|thumb|right|Signature verification process of the default procedure]] | ||
# the public key and the signature are popped from the stack, in that order. | # the public key and the signature are popped from the stack, in that order. Signature format is [<DER signature> <1 byte hash-type>]. Hashtype value is last byte of the sig. | ||
# A new | # A new subScript is created from the scriptCode (the scriptCode is the actually executed script - either the scriptPubKey for non-segwit, non-P2SH scripts, or the redeemscript in non-segwit P2SH scripts). The script from the immediately after the most recently parsed OP_CODESEPARATOR to the end of the script is the subScript. If there is no OP_CODESEPARATOR the entire script becomes the subScript | ||
# | # Any occurrences of sig are deleted from subScript, if present (it is ''not standard'' to have a signature in an input script of a transaction) | ||
# | # Any remaining OP_CODESEPARATORS are removed from subScript | ||
# The hashtype is removed from the last byte of the sig and stored | # The hashtype is removed from the last byte of the sig and stored | ||
# A copy is made of the current transaction (hereby referred to txCopy) | # A copy is made of the current transaction (hereby referred to txCopy) | ||
Line 41: | Line 43: | ||
<li> If hashtype & SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY then apply the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY-procedure | <li> If hashtype & SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY then apply the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY-procedure | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Hence, hashtype SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY may be applied also after any other hashtype-procedure<ref>[http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.7.1/bitcoin-0.7.1-linux.tar.gz file src/src/script.cpp in bitcoin-0.7.1]</ref>. Besides the four listed hashtypes only a hashtype of value 0 appears a few | Hence, hashtype SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY may be applied also after any other hashtype-procedure<ref>[http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.7.1/bitcoin-0.7.1-linux.tar.gz file src/src/script.cpp in bitcoin-0.7.1]</ref>. Besides the four listed hashtypes only a hashtype of value 0 appears a few times in the (main) block chain (and is handled like SIGHASH_ALL). | ||
=== Hashtype SIGHASH_ALL (default) === | === Hashtype SIGHASH_ALL (default) === | ||
Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
=== Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_SINGLE === | === Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_SINGLE === | ||
# The output of txCopy is resized to the size of the current input index+1 | # The output of txCopy is resized to the size of the current input index+1. | ||
# All other txCopy outputs aside from the output that is the same as the current input index are set to a blank script and a value of (long) -1 | # All other txCopy outputs aside from the output that is the same as the current input index are set to a blank script and a value of (long) -1. | ||
# All other txCopy inputs aside from the current input are set to have an nSequence index of zero | # All other txCopy inputs aside from the current input are set to have an nSequence index of zero. | ||
Think of this as "sign '''one''' of the outputs-- I don't care where the other outputs go." | Think of this as "sign '''one''' of the outputs-- I don't care where the other outputs go". | ||
Note: The transaction that uses SIGHASH_SINGLE type of signature should not have more inputs than outputs. | |||
However if it does (because of the pre-existing implementation), it shall not be rejected, but instead for every "illegal" input (meaning: an input that has an index bigger than the maximum output index) the node should still verify it, though assuming the hash of 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260595.0] | |||
=== Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY === | === Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY === | ||
# The txCopy input vector is resized to a length of one | # The txCopy input vector is resized to a length of one. | ||
# The current input is set as the first and only member of this vector | # The current transaction input (with scriptPubKey modified to subScript) is set as the first and only member of this vector. | ||
Think of this as "Let other people add inputs to this transaction, I don't care where the rest of the bitcoins come from." | Think of this as "Let other people add inputs to this transaction, I don't care where the rest of the bitcoins come from." | ||
Line 71: | Line 76: | ||
===Final signature check=== | ===Final signature check=== | ||
An array of bytes is constructed from the serialized txCopy appended by four bytes for the hash type. This array is sha256 hashed twice, then the public key is used | An array of bytes is constructed from the serialized txCopy appended by four bytes for the hash type. This array is sha256 hashed twice, then the public key is used to check the supplied signature against the hash. | ||
The secp256k1 elliptic curve is used for the verification with the given public key. | The secp256k1 elliptic curve is used for the verification with the given public key. | ||
Line 93: | Line 98: | ||
input 0: | input 0: | ||
c9 97 a5 e5 6e 10 41 02 input | c9 97 a5 e5 6e 10 41 02 input transaction hash (from block 9) | ||
fa 20 9c 6a 85 2d d9 06 | fa 20 9c 6a 85 2d d9 06 | ||
60 a2 0b 2d 9c 35 24 23 | 60 a2 0b 2d 9c 35 24 23 | ||
ed ce 25 85 7f cd 37 04 | ed ce 25 85 7f cd 37 04 | ||
00 00 00 00 input index | 00 00 00 00 input index (index of txout in block 9 that's being spent) | ||
48 size of script (var_uint) | 48 size of script (var_uint) | ||
Line 232: | Line 237: | ||
ss.write_data(raw_script); | ss.write_data(raw_script); | ||
// output | // output 1 | ||
ss.write_8_bytes(4000000000); | ss.write_8_bytes(4000000000); | ||
// script for output 0 | // script for output 0 | ||
Line 292: | Line 297: | ||
[[Category:Technical]] | [[Category:Technical]] | ||
[[Category:Developer]] | [[Category:Developer]] | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:OP_CHECKSIG}} |
Latest revision as of 21:44, 16 January 2019
This article describes the operation of OP_CHECKSIG in non-segwit scripts. The hash digest for OP_CHECKSIG, OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY, OP_CHECKMULTISIG, OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY in segwit scripts is calculated differently, as described in BIP 143.
OP_CHECKSIG is script opcode used to verify that the signature for a tx input is valid. OP_CHECKSIG expects two values to be on the stack. These are, in order of stack depth, the public key and the signature of the script. These two values are normally obtained by running the scriptSig script of the transaction input we are attempting to validate. The scriptSig script is deleted after it is run, but the stack is left as is. Then, the scriptPubKey script from the previous transaction output that is now being spent is run, generally concluding in an OP_CHECKSIG.
The standard scriptPubKey checks that the public key (actually a hash of) is a particular value, and that OP_CHECKSIG passes.
For normal transaction inputs, if the creator of the current transaction can successfully create a ScriptSig signature that uses the right public key for the ScriptPubKey of the transaction output they are attempting to spend, that transaction input is considered valid.
Parameters
In addition to the stack parameters and the script code itself, in order to operate correctly OP_CHECKSIG needs to know the current transaction and the index of current transaction input.
How it works
Firstly always this (the default) procedure is applied:
- the public key and the signature are popped from the stack, in that order. Signature format is [<DER signature> <1 byte hash-type>]. Hashtype value is last byte of the sig.
- A new subScript is created from the scriptCode (the scriptCode is the actually executed script - either the scriptPubKey for non-segwit, non-P2SH scripts, or the redeemscript in non-segwit P2SH scripts). The script from the immediately after the most recently parsed OP_CODESEPARATOR to the end of the script is the subScript. If there is no OP_CODESEPARATOR the entire script becomes the subScript
- Any occurrences of sig are deleted from subScript, if present (it is not standard to have a signature in an input script of a transaction)
- Any remaining OP_CODESEPARATORS are removed from subScript
- The hashtype is removed from the last byte of the sig and stored
- A copy is made of the current transaction (hereby referred to txCopy)
- The scripts for all transaction inputs in txCopy are set to empty scripts (exactly 1 byte 0x00)
- The script for the current transaction input in txCopy is set to subScript (lead in by its length as a var-integer encoded!)
Now depending on the hashtype various things can happen to txCopy, these will be discussed individually.
Hashtype Values (from script.h):
Name | Value |
---|---|
SIGHASH_ALL | 0x00000001 |
SIGHASH_NONE | 0x00000002 |
SIGHASH_SINGLE | 0x00000003 |
SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY | 0x00000080 |
- If (hashtype&31) = SIGHASH_NONE then apply the SIGHASH_NONE-procedure
- If (hashtype&31) = SIGHASH_SINGLE then apply the SIGHASH_SINGLE-procedure
- If hashtype & SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY then apply the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY-procedure
Hence, hashtype SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY may be applied also after any other hashtype-procedure[1]. Besides the four listed hashtypes only a hashtype of value 0 appears a few times in the (main) block chain (and is handled like SIGHASH_ALL).
Hashtype SIGHASH_ALL (default)
No special further handling occurs in the default case. Think of this as "sign all of the outputs." Which is already done by the default procedure.
Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_NONE
- The output of txCopy is set to a vector of zero size.
- All other inputs aside from the current input in txCopy have their nSequence index set to zero
Think of this as "sign none of the outputs-- I don't care where the bitcoins go."
Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_SINGLE
- The output of txCopy is resized to the size of the current input index+1.
- All other txCopy outputs aside from the output that is the same as the current input index are set to a blank script and a value of (long) -1.
- All other txCopy inputs aside from the current input are set to have an nSequence index of zero.
Think of this as "sign one of the outputs-- I don't care where the other outputs go".
Note: The transaction that uses SIGHASH_SINGLE type of signature should not have more inputs than outputs. However if it does (because of the pre-existing implementation), it shall not be rejected, but instead for every "illegal" input (meaning: an input that has an index bigger than the maximum output index) the node should still verify it, though assuming the hash of 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 [1]
Procedure for Hashtype SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY
- The txCopy input vector is resized to a length of one.
- The current transaction input (with scriptPubKey modified to subScript) is set as the first and only member of this vector.
Think of this as "Let other people add inputs to this transaction, I don't care where the rest of the bitcoins come from."
Final signature check
An array of bytes is constructed from the serialized txCopy appended by four bytes for the hash type. This array is sha256 hashed twice, then the public key is used to check the supplied signature against the hash. The secp256k1 elliptic curve is used for the verification with the given public key.
Return values
OP_CHECKSIG will push true to the stack if the check passed, false otherwise. OP_CHECKSIG_VERIFY leaves nothing on the stack but will cause the script eval to fail immediately if the check does not pass.
Code samples and raw dumps
Taking the first transaction in Bitcoin which is in block number 170, we would get after serialising the transaction but before we hash+sign (or verify) it:
- http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000d1145790a8694403d4063f323d499e655c83426834d4ce2f8dd4a2ee
- http://blockexplorer.com/tx/f4184fc596403b9d638783cf57adfe4c75c605f6356fbc91338530e9831e9e16
See also libbitcoin for code samples.
01 00 00 00 version 01 number of inputs (var_uint) input 0: c9 97 a5 e5 6e 10 41 02 input transaction hash (from block 9) fa 20 9c 6a 85 2d d9 06 60 a2 0b 2d 9c 35 24 23 ed ce 25 85 7f cd 37 04 00 00 00 00 input index (index of txout in block 9 that's being spent) 48 size of script (var_uint) 47 push 71 bytes to stack 30 44 02 20 4e 45 e1 69 32 b8 af 51 49 61 a1 d3 a1 a2 5f df 3f 4f 77 32 e9 d6 24 c6 c6 15 48 ab 5f b8 cd 41 02 20 18 15 22 ec 8e ca 07 de 48 60 a4 ac dd 12 90 9d 83 1c c5 6c bb ac 46 22 08 22 21 a8 76 8d 1d 09 01 ff ff ff ff sequence 02 number of outputs (var_uint) output 0: 00 ca 9a 3b 00 00 00 00 amount = 10.00000000 43 size of script (var_uint) script for output 0: 41 push 65 bytes to stack 04 ae 1a 62 fe 09 c5 f5 1b 13 90 5f 07 f0 6b 99 a2 f7 15 9b 22 25 f3 74 cd 37 8d 71 30 2f a2 84 14 e7 aa b3 73 97 f5 54 a7 df 5f 14 2c 21 c1 b7 30 3b 8a 06 26 f1 ba de d5 c7 2a 70 4f 7e 6c d8 4c ac OP_CHECKSIG output 1: 00 28 6b ee 00 00 00 00 amount = 40.00000000 43 size of script (var_uint) script for output 1: 41 push 65 bytes to stack 04 11 db 93 e1 dc db 8a 01 6b 49 84 0f 8c 53 bc 1e b6 8a 38 2e 97 b1 48 2e ca d7 b1 48 a6 90 9a 5c b2 e0 ea dd fb 84 cc f9 74 44 64 f8 2e 16 0b fa 9b 8b 64 f9 d4 c0 3f 99 9b 86 43 f6 56 b4 12 a3 ac OP_CHECKSIG 00 00 00 00 locktime 01 00 00 00 hash_code_type (added on) result = 01 00 00 00 01 c9 97 a5 e5 6e 10 41 02 fa 20 9c 6a 85 2d d9 06 60 a2 0b 2d 9c 35 24 23 ed ce 25 85 7f cd 37 04 00 00 00 00 43 41 04 11 db 93 e1 dc db 8a 01 6b 49 84 0f 8c 53 bc 1e b6 8a 38 2e 97 b1 48 2e ca d7 b1 48 a6 90 9a 5c b2 e0 ea dd fb 84 cc f9 74 44 64 f8 2e 16 0b fa 9b 8b 64 f9 d4 c0 3f 99 9b 86 43 f6 56 b4 12 a3 ac ff ff ff ff 02 00 ca 9a 3b 00 00 00 00 43 41 04 ae 1a 62 fe 09 c5 f5 1b 13 90 5f 07 f0 6b 99 a2 f7 15 9b 22 25 f3 74 cd 37 8d 71 30 2f a2 84 14 e7 aa b3 73 97 f5 54 a7 df 5f 14 2c 21 c1 b7 30 3b 8a 06 26 f1 ba de d5 c7 2a 70 4f 7e 6c d8 4c ac 00 28 6b ee 00 00 00 00 43 41 04 11 db 93 e1 dc db 8a 01 6b 49 84 0f 8c 53 bc 1e b6 8a 38 2e 97 b1 48 2e ca d7 b1 48 a6 90 9a 5c b2 e0 ea dd fb 84 cc f9 74 44 64 f8 2e 16 0b fa 9b 8b 64 f9 d4 c0 3f 99 9b 86 43 f6 56 b4 12 a3 ac 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00
To understand where that raw dump has come from, it may be useful to examine tests/ec-key.cpp in libbitcoin,
libbitcoin has a unit test under tests/ec-key.cpp (make ec-key && ./bin/tests/ec-key). There is also a working OP_CHECKSIG implementation in src/script.cpp under script::op_checksig(). See also the unit test: tests/script-test.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <bitcoin/util/serializer.hpp>
#include <bitcoin/util/elliptic_curve_key.hpp>
#include <bitcoin/util/sha256.hpp>
#include <bitcoin/util/assert.hpp>
#include <bitcoin/util/logger.hpp>
#include <bitcoin/types.hpp>
#include <openssl/ecdsa.h>
#include <openssl/obj_mac.h>
using libbitcoin::elliptic_curve_key;
using libbitcoin::serializer;
using libbitcoin::hash_digest;
using libbitcoin::data_chunk;
using libbitcoin::log_info;
using libbitcoin::log_fatal;
int main()
{
serializer ss;
// blk number 170, tx 1, input 0
// version = 1
ss.write_4_bytes(1);
// 1 inputs
ss.write_var_uint(1);
// input 0
// prevout hash
ss.write_hash(hash_digest{0x04, 0x37, 0xcd, 0x7f, 0x85, 0x25, 0xce, 0xed, 0x23, 0x24, 0x35, 0x9c, 0x2d, 0x0b, 0xa2, 0x60, 0x06, 0xd9, 0x2d, 0x85, 0x6a, 0x9c, 0x20, 0xfa, 0x02, 0x41, 0x10, 0x6e, 0xe5, 0xa5, 0x97, 0xc9});
// prevout index
ss.write_4_bytes(0);
// input script after running OP_CHECKSIG for this tx is a single
// OP_CHECKSIG opcode
data_chunk raw_data;
raw_data = {0x04, 0x11, 0xdb, 0x93, 0xe1, 0xdc, 0xdb, 0x8a, 0x01, 0x6b, 0x49, 0x84, 0x0f, 0x8c, 0x53, 0xbc, 0x1e, 0xb6, 0x8a, 0x38, 0x2e, 0x97, 0xb1, 0x48, 0x2e, 0xca, 0xd7, 0xb1, 0x48, 0xa6, 0x90, 0x9a, 0x5c, 0xb2, 0xe0, 0xea, 0xdd, 0xfb, 0x84, 0xcc, 0xf9, 0x74, 0x44, 0x64, 0xf8, 0x2e, 0x16, 0x0b, 0xfa, 0x9b, 0x8b, 0x64, 0xf9, 0xd4, 0xc0, 0x3f, 0x99, 0x9b, 0x86, 0x43, 0xf6, 0x56, 0xb4, 0x12, 0xa3};
data_chunk raw_script;
raw_script = data_chunk();
raw_script.push_back(raw_data.size());
libbitcoin::extend_data(raw_script, raw_data);
raw_script.push_back(172);
ss.write_var_uint(raw_script.size());
ss.write_data(raw_script);
// sequence
ss.write_4_bytes(0xffffffff);
// 2 outputs for this tx
ss.write_var_uint(2);
// output 0
ss.write_8_bytes(1000000000);
// script for output 0
raw_data = {0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b, 0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7, 0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d, 0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3, 0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c, 0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1, 0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c, 0xd8, 0x4c};
// when data < 75, we can just write it's length as a single byte ('special'
// opcodes)
raw_script = data_chunk();
raw_script.push_back(raw_data.size());
libbitcoin::extend_data(raw_script, raw_data);
// OP_CHECKSIG
raw_script.push_back(172);
// now actually write the script
ss.write_var_uint(raw_script.size());
ss.write_data(raw_script);
// output 1
ss.write_8_bytes(4000000000);
// script for output 0
raw_data = {0x04, 0x11, 0xdb, 0x93, 0xe1, 0xdc, 0xdb, 0x8a, 0x01, 0x6b, 0x49, 0x84, 0x0f, 0x8c, 0x53, 0xbc, 0x1e, 0xb6, 0x8a, 0x38, 0x2e, 0x97, 0xb1, 0x48, 0x2e, 0xca, 0xd7, 0xb1, 0x48, 0xa6, 0x90, 0x9a, 0x5c, 0xb2, 0xe0, 0xea, 0xdd, 0xfb, 0x84, 0xcc, 0xf9, 0x74, 0x44, 0x64, 0xf8, 0x2e, 0x16, 0x0b, 0xfa, 0x9b, 0x8b, 0x64, 0xf9, 0xd4, 0xc0, 0x3f, 0x99, 0x9b, 0x86, 0x43, 0xf6, 0x56, 0xb4, 0x12, 0xa3};
// when data < 75, we can just write it's length as a single byte ('special'
raw_script.push_back(raw_data.size());
libbitcoin::extend_data(raw_script, raw_data);
// OP_CHECKSIG
raw_script.push_back(172);
// now actually write the script
ss.write_var_uint(raw_script.size());
ss.write_data(raw_script);
// End of 2 outputs
// locktime
ss.write_4_bytes(0);
// write hash_type_code
ss.write_4_bytes(1);
// Dump hex to screen
log_info() << "hashing:";
{
auto log_obj = log_info();
log_obj << std::hex;
for (int val: ss.get_data())
log_obj << std::setfill('0') << std::setw(2) << val << ' ';
}
log_info();
data_chunk raw_tx = {0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0xc9, 0x97, 0xa5, 0xe5, 0x6e, 0x10, 0x41, 0x02, 0xfa, 0x20, 0x9c, 0x6a, 0x85, 0x2d, 0xd9, 0x06, 0x60, 0xa2, 0x0b, 0x2d, 0x9c, 0x35, 0x24, 0x23, 0xed, 0xce, 0x25, 0x85, 0x7f, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x43, 0x41, 0x04, 0x11, 0xdb, 0x93, 0xe1, 0xdc, 0xdb, 0x8a, 0x01, 0x6b, 0x49, 0x84, 0x0f, 0x8c, 0x53, 0xbc, 0x1e, 0xb6, 0x8a, 0x38, 0x2e, 0x97, 0xb1, 0x48, 0x2e, 0xca, 0xd7, 0xb1, 0x48, 0xa6, 0x90, 0x9a, 0x5c, 0xb2, 0xe0, 0xea, 0xdd, 0xfb, 0x84, 0xcc, 0xf9, 0x74, 0x44, 0x64, 0xf8, 0x2e, 0x16, 0x0b, 0xfa, 0x9b, 0x8b, 0x64, 0xf9, 0xd4, 0xc0, 0x3f, 0x99, 0x9b, 0x86, 0x43, 0xf6, 0x56, 0xb4, 0x12, 0xa3, 0xac, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x02, 0x00, 0xca, 0x9a, 0x3b, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x43, 0x41, 0x04, 0xae, 0x1a, 0x62, 0xfe, 0x09, 0xc5, 0xf5, 0x1b, 0x13, 0x90, 0x5f, 0x07, 0xf0, 0x6b, 0x99, 0xa2, 0xf7, 0x15, 0x9b, 0x22, 0x25, 0xf3, 0x74, 0xcd, 0x37, 0x8d, 0x71, 0x30, 0x2f, 0xa2, 0x84, 0x14, 0xe7, 0xaa, 0xb3, 0x73, 0x97, 0xf5, 0x54, 0xa7, 0xdf, 0x5f, 0x14, 0x2c, 0x21, 0xc1, 0xb7, 0x30, 0x3b, 0x8a, 0x06, 0x26, 0xf1, 0xba, 0xde, 0xd5, 0xc7, 0x2a, 0x70, 0x4f, 0x7e, 0x6c, 0xd8, 0x4c, 0xac, 0x00, 0x28, 0x6b, 0xee, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x43, 0x41, 0x04, 0x11, 0xdb, 0x93, 0xe1, 0xdc, 0xdb, 0x8a, 0x01, 0x6b, 0x49, 0x84, 0x0f, 0x8c, 0x53, 0xbc, 0x1e, 0xb6, 0x8a, 0x38, 0x2e, 0x97, 0xb1, 0x48, 0x2e, 0xca, 0xd7, 0xb1, 0x48, 0xa6, 0x90, 0x9a, 0x5c, 0xb2, 0xe0, 0xea, 0xdd, 0xfb, 0x84, 0xcc, 0xf9, 0x74, 0x44, 0x64, 0xf8, 0x2e, 0x16, 0x0b, 0xfa, 0x9b, 0x8b, 0x64, 0xf9, 0xd4, 0xc0, 0x3f, 0x99, 0x9b, 0x86, 0x43, 0xf6, 0x56, 0xb4, 0x12, 0xa3, 0xac, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00};
BITCOIN_ASSERT(raw_tx == ss.get_data());
hash_digest tx_hash = libbitcoin::generate_sha256_hash(ss.get_data());
data_chunk pubkey{0x04, 0x11, 0xdb, 0x93, 0xe1, 0xdc, 0xdb, 0x8a, 0x01, 0x6b, 0x49, 0x84, 0x0f, 0x8c, 0x53, 0xbc, 0x1e, 0xb6, 0x8a, 0x38, 0x2e, 0x97, 0xb1, 0x48, 0x2e, 0xca, 0xd7, 0xb1, 0x48, 0xa6, 0x90, 0x9a, 0x5c, 0xb2, 0xe0, 0xea, 0xdd, 0xfb, 0x84, 0xcc, 0xf9, 0x74, 0x44, 0x64, 0xf8, 0x2e, 0x16, 0x0b, 0xfa, 0x9b, 0x8b, 0x64, 0xf9, 0xd4, 0xc0, 0x3f, 0x99, 0x9b, 0x86, 0x43, 0xf6, 0x56, 0xb4, 0x12, 0xa3};
// Leave out last byte since that's the hash_type_code (SIGHASH_ALL in this
// case)
data_chunk signature{0x30, 0x44, 0x02, 0x20, 0x4e, 0x45, 0xe1, 0x69, 0x32, 0xb8, 0xaf, 0x51, 0x49, 0x61, 0xa1, 0xd3, 0xa1, 0xa2, 0x5f, 0xdf, 0x3f, 0x4f, 0x77, 0x32, 0xe9, 0xd6, 0x24, 0xc6, 0xc6, 0x15, 0x48, 0xab, 0x5f, 0xb8, 0xcd, 0x41, 0x02, 0x20, 0x18, 0x15, 0x22, 0xec, 0x8e, 0xca, 0x07, 0xde, 0x48, 0x60, 0xa4, 0xac, 0xdd, 0x12, 0x90, 0x9d, 0x83, 0x1c, 0xc5, 0x6c, 0xbb, 0xac, 0x46, 0x22, 0x08, 0x22, 0x21, 0xa8, 0x76, 0x8d, 0x1d, 0x09};
BITCOIN_ASSERT(signature.size() == 70);
elliptic_curve_key key;
if (!key.set_public_key(pubkey))
{
log_fatal() << "unable to set EC public key";
return -1;
}
log_info() << "checksig returns: " << (key.verify(tx_hash, signature) ? "true" : "false");
return 0;
}