Talk:BlockExplorer.com: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches?" |
m Unsigned comment |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? | Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? {{Unsigned|Luke-jr|22:01, 23 January 2011}} | ||
:I thought about it, but I decided that 300 is meant for different formats of the same data. From the RFC: "The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of '''representations'''". [[User:Theymos|theymos]] 04:01, 24 January 2011 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:28, 15 August 2014
Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke-jr (talk • contribs) at 22:01, 23 January 2011
- I thought about it, but I decided that 300 is meant for different formats of the same data. From the RFC: "The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of representations". theymos 04:01, 24 January 2011 (GMT)