Talk:Bitcoin symbol: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TiagoTiago (talk | contribs) →Pros and cons as different collums?: new section |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== ϭ has relation to bitcoin == | == ϭ has relation to bitcoin == | ||
<font style="font-size:1.5em;">ϭ</font> actually does have a visible relation to bitcoin, seeing as it is the lower-case russian B. :) | <font style="font-size:1.5em;">ϭ</font> actually does have a visible relation to bitcoin, seeing as it is the lower-case russian B. :) {{unsigned|Nanotube|06:15, 2 January 2011}} | ||
== Pros and cons as different collums? == | == Pros and cons as different collums? == | ||
I think it would be better if the pros and cons were in sepparate colums to make it easier to evaluate the proposals; what do you say? --[[User:TiagoTiago|TiagoTiago]] 15:23, 26 April 2011 (GMT) | I think it would be better if the pros and cons were in sepparate colums to make it easier to evaluate the proposals; what do you say? --[[User:TiagoTiago|TiagoTiago]] 15:23, 26 April 2011 (GMT) | ||
== Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol == | |||
Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT) | |||
* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. In fact, even if Bitcoin were to get enough non-niche use, both "submissions" currently listed are basically just font variants of B⃦. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT) | |||
* I think it would be a good idea to get our own symbol, but as B⃦ is already fairly universally accepted, it isn't a huge priority. I think the Existing Unicode symbol section should stay. I don't think though we should discard the two submissions based on them being stylized B⃦'s. I think they are sufficiently different from B⃦ for our purposes. [[User:Zellfaze|Zellfaze]] 15:37, 11 April 2012 (GMT) | |||
== Unit and subunit symbols == | |||
The proposal is to use existing unicode symbols. My preference is to use the unicode \u243 html Ƀ for bitcoin and the unicode \u289 html ʉ for microcoin where 1 bitcoin = 1,000,000.00 microcoins | |||
You can view the [[Units]] discussion | |||
What do you think? | |||
== Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code? == | |||
Bitcoin's proposed ISO 4217 alpha code is BTC or XTC, but does it have a proposed ISO 4217 numeric code?--[[User:Geremia|Geremia]] ([[User talk:Geremia|talk]]) 05:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:38, 10 December 2016
ϭ has relation to bitcoin
ϭ actually does have a visible relation to bitcoin, seeing as it is the lower-case russian B. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanotube (talk • contribs) at 06:15, 2 January 2011
Pros and cons as different collums?
I think it would be better if the pros and cons were in sepparate colums to make it easier to evaluate the proposals; what do you say? --TiagoTiago 15:23, 26 April 2011 (GMT)
Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol
Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" Pander 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)
- I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. In fact, even if Bitcoin were to get enough non-niche use, both "submissions" currently listed are basically just font variants of B⃦. --Luke-jr 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)
- I think it would be a good idea to get our own symbol, but as B⃦ is already fairly universally accepted, it isn't a huge priority. I think the Existing Unicode symbol section should stay. I don't think though we should discard the two submissions based on them being stylized B⃦'s. I think they are sufficiently different from B⃦ for our purposes. Zellfaze 15:37, 11 April 2012 (GMT)
Unit and subunit symbols
The proposal is to use existing unicode symbols. My preference is to use the unicode \u243 html Ƀ for bitcoin and the unicode \u289 html ʉ for microcoin where 1 bitcoin = 1,000,000.00 microcoins You can view the Units discussion What do you think?
Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code?
Bitcoin's proposed ISO 4217 alpha code is BTC or XTC, but does it have a proposed ISO 4217 numeric code?--Geremia (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)