# Difference between revisions of "User:Ids"

(about me, and especuially my hopes for adaptive difficulty being helpful) |
m (apology for adaptive difficulty stub nature while I get my head around wiki-maths-speak) |
||

Line 3: | Line 3: | ||

I am especially interested in helping to improve bitcoin's usability from a non-tech-savvy user's perspective. By this I don't just mean GUI improvements and the like - plenty of people far more talented than me are working on that - but changes to the network protocol itself that will help with responsiveness from a merchant's or customer's point of view, while not compromising cryptographic security, decentralization, or the strength of the blockchain. | I am especially interested in helping to improve bitcoin's usability from a non-tech-savvy user's perspective. By this I don't just mean GUI improvements and the like - plenty of people far more talented than me are working on that - but changes to the network protocol itself that will help with responsiveness from a merchant's or customer's point of view, while not compromising cryptographic security, decentralization, or the strength of the blockchain. | ||

− | I have a provisional proposal, which I call [[Adaptive_difficulty|adaptive difficulty]], which I believe will help with this. I'm hoping to eventually put it up as a BIP. For now I'll work on it at that non-BIP page. Comments and feedback welcome. (Remember that for now, the Bayesian analysis of what proof-of-work is deserved by what difficulty-sequence is ''unfinished'', and the formulae are of indicative status only.) | + | I have a provisional proposal, which I call [[Adaptive_difficulty|adaptive difficulty]], which I believe will help with this. I'm hoping to eventually put it up as a BIP. For now I'll work on it at that non-BIP page. Comments and feedback welcome. (Remember that for now, the Bayesian analysis of what proof-of-work is deserved by what difficulty-sequence is ''unfinished'', and the formulae are of indicative status only.) ''(in fact the whole page is just a stub for now - I must first master mathematical wiki-speak!)'' |

## Revision as of 22:44, 6 May 2012

I worked as a computing lab assistant at Imperial College, London, U.K. from 1991-2011.

I am especially interested in helping to improve bitcoin's usability from a non-tech-savvy user's perspective. By this I don't just mean GUI improvements and the like - plenty of people far more talented than me are working on that - but changes to the network protocol itself that will help with responsiveness from a merchant's or customer's point of view, while not compromising cryptographic security, decentralization, or the strength of the blockchain.

I have a provisional proposal, which I call adaptive difficulty, which I believe will help with this. I'm hoping to eventually put it up as a BIP. For now I'll work on it at that non-BIP page. Comments and feedback welcome. (Remember that for now, the Bayesian analysis of what proof-of-work is deserved by what difficulty-sequence is *unfinished*, and the formulae are of indicative status only.) *(in fact the whole page is just a stub for now - I must first master mathematical wiki-speak!)*