Covenants support: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
m alphabetize
E0 (talk | contribs)
1 edit
Added my current opinion
Line 72: Line 72:
|-
|-
| reardencode || LNHANCE || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Wanting}} || {{Wanting}}<ref name="reardenvault">Only one of CCV and VAULT should be implemented, as they enable nearly identical constructions</ref> || {{Wanting}}<ref name="reardenvault"/> || {{Deficient}} || {{No}}
| reardencode || LNHANCE || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Wanting}} || {{Wanting}}<ref name="reardenvault">Only one of CCV and VAULT should be implemented, as they enable nearly identical constructions</ref> || {{Wanting}}<ref name="reardenvault"/> || {{Deficient}} || {{No}}
|-
| Ethan Heilman || OP_CAT || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}}
|-
|-
| RobinLinus || BitVM || {{No}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{No}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Weak}}
| RobinLinus || BitVM || {{No}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{No}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Weak}}

Revision as of 06:13, 6 December 2024

This list is incomplete and under construction.

Evaluating Not sure. Still evaluating the idea
No Doesn't support (but might or might not go along with it with sufficient community support)
Deficient Okay with the idea, but considers it to have insufficient community support
Weak Better than nothing at all
Wanting Positively likes the idea, but considers it to have insufficient community support
Acceptable It is a workable solution
Prefer The best option all things considered

Developers

Developer Affiliation LNHANCE OP_CAT OP_CCV OP_VAULT OP_TXHASH SIGHASH_APO
OP_CTV OP_CSFS OP_PAIRCOMMIT OP_INTERNALKEY
1440000bytes joinstr Prefer Acceptable No Acceptable Deficient Evaluating Acceptable No No
ArminSabouri OP_CAT Acceptable Prefer Evaluating Prefer Prefer Evaluating No Prefer Weak
benthecarman Taproot Wizards Prefer Prefer Acceptable Prefer Prefer Wanting Wanting Wanting Weak
chrisguida Lightning Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable No Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Prefer
cryptoquick Surmount Systems Acceptable Prefer Evaluating Prefer Acceptable Evaluating Acceptable Prefer No
Evan Kaloudis ZEUS Prefer Wanting Weak Acceptable No Acceptable Prefer Deficient Prefer
instagibbs Spiral Weak Wanting No Wanting Wanting Evaluating Wanting Wanting Weak
jamesob ??? Prefer Prefer Weak Prefer Acceptable Wanting Acceptable Deficient Weak
jaybny Sidepit Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Weak Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable
Jon Atack Bitcoin Core Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating
Luke Dashjr Bitcoin Knots Acceptable Wanting Evaluating No Deficient Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable
matthewjablack Atomic Finance Prefer Acceptable Weak Acceptable Wanting Evaluating Acceptable Wanting Weak
moonsettler LNhance Prefer Prefer Prefer Prefer Wanting Wanting Wanting Wanting Weak
Orkun Kılıç Citrea Acceptable Wanting No No Prefer Evaluating Deficient Prefer Weak
reardencode LNHANCE Prefer Prefer Acceptable Prefer Wanting Wanting[1] Wanting[1] Deficient No
Ethan Heilman OP_CAT Prefer Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating Prefer Prefer Evaluating
RobinLinus BitVM No Acceptable Evaluating No Deficient Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Weak
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Only one of CCV and VAULT should be implemented, as they enable nearly identical constructions
Retrieved from "https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Covenants_support&oldid=70407"