Nuclear war and Bitcoin: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "A nuclear war would be problematic in several ways for Bitcoin, though maybe not the end of the world. ===Attack scope=== It is first necessary to consider the scope of a nu..."
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A nuclear war would be problematic in several ways for Bitcoin, though maybe not the end of the world.
A nuclear war would be problematic for Bitcoin in several ways, though maybe it would not be the end of the world.


===Attack scope===
===Attack scope===

Revision as of 04:15, 14 April 2018

A nuclear war would be problematic for Bitcoin in several ways, though maybe it would not be the end of the world.

Attack scope

It is first necessary to consider the scope of a nuclear attack. Some possibilities are:

  • Usage of tactical nuclear weapons, which are mainly just large bombs
  • A targeted attack on a few cities, which will destroy those cities, but might not much direct wider impact.
  • An EMP-focused attack, in which a small number of nuclear weapons are detonated at high altitude in order to destroy a very large amount of electronic equipment.
  • All-out war, in which the belligerent countries empty their reserves of nuclear weapons, and most primary and secondary targets within non-neutral countries are destroyed

A lot of people think that everyone is just going to quickly die in a nuclear war, and so it's no use planning for post-war scenarios. This is wrong; in most of the scenarios listed above, the vast majority of people would not be directly harmed at all by the war. Even in the worst-case all-out-war scenario, probably at least half of the affected populations would survive the blast and immediate radiation, and could potentially live long lives if they take the correct actions in the aftermath to avoid excessive fallout exposure.

Bitcoin's reliance on the Internet

For Bitcoin to function:

  1. All miners have to be connected in such a way that there is low latency between them. Miners that can't connect to the majority of mining power over a low-latency connection cannot mine.
  2. Anyone wishing to transact must be able to connect to the same Internet that the majority of miners are using at some point. There are no latency requirements for sending or receiving transactions.

Many nuclear scenarios could damage cables and backbone routers, segmenting parts of the Internet. In this case, it would be necessary for people wishing to transact to find some way of communicating with the single segment containing the most mining power, such as by using satellite communication, dial-up connections, or even by writing transactions down on paper and moving them physically. This would make Bitcoin more cumbersome to use -- perhaps too cumbersome to be realistic during or immediately after a nuclear war --, but still usable.

A likely scenario is that Bitcoin would become frozen and practically unusable - but not destroyed - until the Internet was restored to roughly its former capabilities.

Destruction of mining hardware

If a large amount of mining hardware is destroyed either directly by a nuclear blast or by an EMP, difficulty could get stuck at a too-high level for an extended period of time. The correct response to this is to hardfork to a lower difficulty.

Effects of EMPs

When detonated, nuclear bombs release electromagnetic pulses (EMPs), which are harmful to electronic equipment. A nuclear bomb meant to destroy a ground target will only affect nearby areas with an EMP, but a mere handful of nuclear bombs detonated in the air at strategic points could cause an entire continent to be affected by EMPs.

EMPs are not dangerous to humans, but they have the following effects on electronics:

  • Anything connected to the power grid will be affected as if struck by lightning, but surge protectors will probably not provide protection.
  • All semiconductors are likely to be destroyed. This includes CPUs and SSDs. Small semiconductors that are not connected to anything at the time of the EMP (eg. disconnected USB flash drives) may survive. The larger the item and connected wires/metal, the more it acts as an antenna for the EMP.
  • Magnetic hard drives should preserve their data, though their controller chips are semiconductors which will probably be destroyed by the EMP. So they will probably require manual repairs before being operational post-EMP
  • CDs/DVDs/BDs will be unaffected, as will paper.

An EMP strike could conceivably destroy almost all of a country's, continent's, or the entire world's computers. Bitcoin requires computers to function, so a widespread EMP strike would prevent Bitcoin from functioning in the affected areas until the destroyed computers could be replaced. Even if the entire world was affected, Bitcoin would be frozen with its pre-EMP ledger, not destroyed.

An EMP strike could also destroy private keys. You should have backups of your private keys (or mnemonic) on paper or CD/DVD/BD, which are immune to EMPs.

The Bitcoin block chain is so widely distributed that someone will undoubtedly have a safe copy of it somewhere.