Bit Gold proposal: Difference between revisions
m Make reference to double spending be a link to the article. |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html Bit gold] | * [http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html Bit gold] | ||
* [http://szabo.best.vwh.net/securetitle.html Secure property titles with owner authority] | * [http://szabo.best.vwh.net/securetitle.html Secure property titles with owner authority] | ||
* | * [http://szabo.best.vwh.net/shell.html The origins of money] | ||
* [http://www.runtogold.com/goldmoney/bitgold-review/ Bitgold Review] - Not related to Szabo's Bitgold whatsoever. | |||
Revision as of 15:15, 17 June 2015
The Bit Gold proposal, by Nick Szabo, describes a system for the decentralized creation of unforgeable chains of proofs of work, with each one being attributed to its discoverer's public key, using timestamps and digital signatures. It is said that these proofs of work would have value because they would be scarce, difficult to produce, and securely stored and transferred. Szabo's theory of the economics of such money is described in the linked article on the origins of money.
Transfer with prevention of double-spending, via a Byzantine-resilient peer-to-peer method, is described in another linked article which calls the method secure property titles and proposes also applying it to other kinds of digital property, such as domain names. However, this Byzantine method relies on a quorum of network addresses rather than a quorum of (hash) computing power, so unlike bitcoin it is vulnerable to Sybil attacks.
References
- Bit gold
- Secure property titles with owner authority
- The origins of money
- Bitgold Review - Not related to Szabo's Bitgold whatsoever.