Template:Asic/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (*tableflip* there's no obvious reason why the die size 'mm' is still showing in the second test - will review template code with clear head :))
mNo edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
warning=canceled|
warning=canceled|
sources=Node process<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2246754#msg2246754</ref> introduction date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2788821#msg2788821</ref>|
sources=Node process<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2246754#msg2246754</ref> introduction date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2788821#msg2788821</ref>|
showsources=1|
showsources=1
debug=1
}}
}}
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 15:08, 9 March 2015


ASICMiner
Facilitators: BitQuan,BitFountain
Top
Top
Bottom
Bottom
BE100 BCT
Introduced: 2012-Dec-28
Technical specifications
Package: Sawn QFN40 6x6mm
Markings: BE100
Die:4.66x4.66mm@130nm
Gh/sJ/GhMh/JVMHzWh/HzGh/mm²η-factor
0.33661671.053362.01610.024249.2
0.39281251.153923.13610.024957.4
Notes: The letters 'BE' in the component name/markings stands for "Block Erupter". ASICMiner considers the BE100 their 'Gen1' product.
Sources: Node process, hash rates, core voltages and frequencies[1] package type, dimensions [2] die size (note: conflicting data) [3][4] introduction date[5]

ASICMiner
Facilitators: BitQuan,BitFountain
No pictures available
unknown BCT
Planned: 2012-Nov

Canceled (see notes for details)
Technical specifications
Die:65nm
Notes: Development appears to have been canceled before production. This chip would formally have been ASICMiner's 'Gen2' product.
anceled
Sources: Node process[6] introduction date[7]