Template:Asic/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs) m First test using some actual information - exposing bugs / shortcomings in the template, will be editing for a while more :) |
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs) m *tableflip* there's no obvious reason why the die size 'mm' is still showing in the second test - will review template code with clear head :) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
die=,130nm,,4.66x4.66mm| | die=,130nm,,4.66x4.66mm| | ||
package=Sawn QFN40,6x6mm,BE100| | package=Sawn QFN40,6x6mm,BE100| | ||
notes=The letters 'BE' in the component name/markings stands for "Block Erupter".| | notes=The letters 'BE' in the component name/markings stands for "Block Erupter". ASICMiner considers the BE100 their 'Gen1' product.| | ||
sources=Node process, hash rates, core voltages and frequencies<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg1088043#msg1088043</ref> package type, dimensions <ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1211518#msg1211518</ref> die size (note: conflicting data) <ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1072887#msg1072887</ref><ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119668.msg2552365#msg2552365</ref> introduction date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1422891#msg1422891</ref>| | sources=Node process, hash rates, core voltages and frequencies<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg1088043#msg1088043</ref> package type, dimensions <ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1211518#msg1211518</ref> die size (note: conflicting data) <ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1072887#msg1072887</ref><ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119668.msg2552365#msg2552365</ref> introduction date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1422891#msg1422891</ref>| | ||
showsources=1 | showsources=1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{asic| | |||
dev=ASICMiner,,Logo-asicminer-en.png| | |||
codevs=BitQuan,BitFountain| | |||
chip=unknown,,November 2012,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2246754#msg2246754| | |||
die=,65nm| | |||
notes=Development appears to have been canceled before production. This chip would formally have been ASICMiner's 'Gen2' product.| | |||
warning=canceled| | |||
sources=Node process<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2246754#msg2246754</ref> introduction date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2788821#msg2788821</ref>| | |||
showsources=1| | |||
debug=1 | |||
}} | |||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 01:11, 9 March 2015
 ASICMiner Facilitators: BitQuan,BitFountain |  Top  Bottom | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BE100 BCT Introduced: 2012-Dec-28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technical specifications Package: Sawn QFN40 6x6mm Markings: BE100 Die:4.66x4.66mm@130nm |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes: The letters 'BE' in the component name/markings stands for "Block Erupter". ASICMiner considers the BE100 their 'Gen1' product. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sources: Node process, hash rates, core voltages and frequencies[1] package type, dimensions [2] die size (note: conflicting data) [3][4] introduction date[5] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASICMiner Facilitators: BitQuan,BitFountain | No pictures available |
| unknown BCT Planned: 2012-Nov Canceled (see notes for details) | |
| Technical specifications Die:65nm | |
| Notes: Development appears to have been canceled before production. This chip would formally have been ASICMiner's 'Gen2' product. anceled | |
| Sources: Node process[6] introduction date[7] | |
- ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg1088043#msg1088043
- ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1211518#msg1211518
- ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1072887#msg1072887
- ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119668.msg2552365#msg2552365
- ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1422891#msg1422891
- ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2246754#msg2246754
- ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2788821#msg2788821