Talk:ICBIT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Eldentyrell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Eldentyrell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please stop deleting material this page. For a very long time ICBIT's webpage clearly explained that it was not a central counterparty. Now it's been changed to something absurdly self-contradictory that essentially says "we call ourselves a central counterparty but we aren't one". The whole point of having a futures exchange is that you're exposed to credit risk from only one party and you know who that party is (the exchange). ICBIT is not doing that. If they decide to do that and say so publicly, then feel free to change this page, but unless/until then please stop deleting important facts. [[User:Eldentyrell|Eldentyrell]] ([[User talk:Eldentyrell|talk]]) 16:04, 13 August 2013 (GMT) | Please stop deleting material this page. For a very long time ICBIT's webpage clearly explained that it was not a central counterparty. Now it's been changed to something absurdly self-contradictory that essentially says "we call ourselves a central counterparty but we aren't one and we explicitly deny the responsibilities that define the role of a central counterparty". The whole point of having a futures exchange is that you're exposed to credit risk from only one party and you know who that party is (the exchange). ICBIT is not doing that. If they decide to do that and say so publicly, then feel free to change this page, but unless/until then please stop deleting important facts. [[User:Eldentyrell|Eldentyrell]] ([[User talk:Eldentyrell|talk]]) 16:04, 13 August 2013 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 13 August 2013
Please stop deleting material this page. For a very long time ICBIT's webpage clearly explained that it was not a central counterparty. Now it's been changed to something absurdly self-contradictory that essentially says "we call ourselves a central counterparty but we aren't one and we explicitly deny the responsibilities that define the role of a central counterparty". The whole point of having a futures exchange is that you're exposed to credit risk from only one party and you know who that party is (the exchange). ICBIT is not doing that. If they decide to do that and say so publicly, then feel free to change this page, but unless/until then please stop deleting important facts. Eldentyrell (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2013 (GMT)