Talk:Bitcoin symbol: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT) | Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT) | ||
* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT) | * I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 21 July 2011
ϭ has relation to bitcoin
ϭ actually does have a visible relation to bitcoin, seeing as it is the lower-case russian B. :)
Pros and cons as different collums?
I think it would be better if the pros and cons were in sepparate colums to make it easier to evaluate the proposals; what do you say? --TiagoTiago 15:23, 26 April 2011 (GMT)
Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol
Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" Pander 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)
- I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. --Luke-jr 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)