Talk:Comparison of mining pools: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
ChocoboLee (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:SmokeTooMuch|SmokeTooMuch]] 23:56, 8 June 2011 (GMT) | [[User:SmokeTooMuch|SmokeTooMuch]] 23:56, 8 June 2011 (GMT) | ||
:I agree, but want to add that a 24 hour median value would be a good idea. Not everyone an a specific region is online 24/7. This would even everything out.--[[User:Neptop|Neptop]] 08:46, 9 June 2011 (GMT) | :I agree, but want to add that a 24 hour median value would be a good idea. Not everyone an a specific region is online 24/7. This would even everything out.--[[User:Neptop|Neptop]] 08:46, 9 June 2011 (GMT) | ||
The note about pool hashrate being largely irrelevant is wrong. The pool hashrate determines variance of your payout. A pool with a large hashrate is more likely to have frequent and predictable payouts. --[[User:ChocoboLee|ChocoboLee]] 07:51, 11 July 2011 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 07:51, 11 July 2011
Hashrate entries should be automatically fetched every hour or so. SmokeTooMuch 23:56, 8 June 2011 (GMT)
- I agree, but want to add that a 24 hour median value would be a good idea. Not everyone an a specific region is online 24/7. This would even everything out.--Neptop 08:46, 9 June 2011 (GMT)
The note about pool hashrate being largely irrelevant is wrong. The pool hashrate determines variance of your payout. A pool with a large hashrate is more likely to have frequent and predictable payouts. --ChocoboLee 07:51, 11 July 2011 (GMT)