Comparison of mining pools: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| [[BitLotto Pool]] || Los Angeles || 1 || Prop || kept by pool || - || - || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-08 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=13794.0 Link] || [http://www.bitlottopool.com/ Link] | | [[BitLotto Pool]] || Los Angeles || 1 || Prop || kept by pool || - || - || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-08 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=13794.0 Link] || [http://www.bitlottopool.com/ Link] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[BTC Guild]] || USA, EU || | | [[BTC Guild]] || USA, EU || 939 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donationsf">Donations are possible to unlock features</ref>|| ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-09 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7760.0 Link] || [http://www.btcguild.com/ Link] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[BTCMine]] || UK || 388 || Score || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-03-11 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=4251.0 Link] || [http://www.btcmine.com/ Link] | | [[BTCMine]] || UK || 388 || Score || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-03-11 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=4251.0 Link] || [http://www.btcmine.com/ Link] | ||
Revision as of 18:42, 9 June 2011
| Name | Location | Hashrate (GHash/sec)[1][2] | Reward Type | Transaction fees | Fee PPS | Fee Prop / Score | Audits[3] | Protocol | Launched | Forum Thread | Homepage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BitClockers | Unknown | 18 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 2% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-27 | Link | Link |
| Bitcoin Mining Pool | USA | 93 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 0%[4] | ? | RPC (+LP) | Unknown | Link | Link |
| Bitcoin Pooled Mining (Slush) | London | 1139 | Score | kept by pool | - | 2% | ? | RPC | 2010-11-27 | Link | Link |
| Bitcoins.lc | EU | 84 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-27 | Link | Link |
| BitLotto Pool | Los Angeles | 1 | Prop | kept by pool | - | - | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-06-08 | Link | Link |
| BTC Guild | USA, EU | 939 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 0%[5] | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-09 | Link | Link |
| BTCMine | UK | 388 | Score | kept by pool | - | 2% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-03-11 | Link | Link |
| Continuum | Canada | 8 | PPS / Score | kept by pool | 5% | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-17 | Link | Link |
| DeepBit | Germany | 2369 | PPS / Prop. | kept by pool | 10% | 3% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-02-26 | Link | Link |
| Eligius | USA / Europe | 200 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | ~0.0003% | Yes[6] | RPC (+LP) | 2011-04-27 | Link | Link |
| Mining Team Reddit | USA, EU | 28 | Prop | kept by pool | - | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-25 | Link | Link |
| Ozco.in | AUS | 28 | - | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-06-08 | Link | ||||
| Simplecoin | Unknown | 19 | Prop | kept by pool | - | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-06-02 | Link | Link |
| Swepool | Sweden | 48 | PPS | kept by pool | 8% | - | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-14 | Link | Link |
- ↑ Hashrate is given in gigahash/second.
- ↑ Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. Note however that it is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics.
- ↑ Auditing can be accomplished by third-parties if the pool publishes proofs-of-work for every share.
- ↑ Donations are possible
- ↑ Donations are possible to unlock features
- ↑ Access to Eligius proofs-of-work is available on request.