User talk:Btcwarrior: Difference between revisions
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs) Created page with "Hi there. For Category:Block_chain_browsers the rationale for adding Blockonomics is that it "now has search and is classified as blockexplorer by many". Perhaps the categor..." |
Btcwarrior (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi there. For Category:Block_chain_browsers the rationale for adding Blockonomics is that it "now has search and is classified as blockexplorer by many". Perhaps the category itself should be amended, in that case, to include everything that people feel like is something sort of like bc.i? As it is, there's no way to browse (title) or navigate (top sentence) the block chain through Blockonomics. [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 10:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC) | Hi there. For Category:Block_chain_browsers the rationale for adding Blockonomics is that it "now has search and is classified as blockexplorer by many". Perhaps the category itself should be amended, in that case, to include everything that people feel like is something sort of like bc.i? As it is, there's no way to browse (title) or navigate (top sentence) the block chain through Blockonomics. [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 10:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
Hi , | |||
I understand your concerns. As you can see there is also https://www.walletexplorer.com/ which in the list which doesn't allow block number lookup. Actually we also show tx inputs/outputs https://www.blockonomics.co/api/tx?txid=3b14f2b256a5fad043311e4b36674d455d4ff22db404e8e205af29fafcd0870c&addr=1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh. So we actually show most of the block information (the UI is different) , except block header information like block number, block hash etc. I am open to adding a new category maybe 'Wallet Explorers' . Let me know your thoughts | |||
Latest revision as of 05:23, 3 October 2015
Hi there. For Category:Block_chain_browsers the rationale for adding Blockonomics is that it "now has search and is classified as blockexplorer by many". Perhaps the category itself should be amended, in that case, to include everything that people feel like is something sort of like bc.i? As it is, there's no way to browse (title) or navigate (top sentence) the block chain through Blockonomics. TheRealSteve (talk) 10:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi ,
I understand your concerns. As you can see there is also https://www.walletexplorer.com/ which in the list which doesn't allow block number lookup. Actually we also show tx inputs/outputs https://www.blockonomics.co/api/tx?txid=3b14f2b256a5fad043311e4b36674d455d4ff22db404e8e205af29fafcd0870c&addr=1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh. So we actually show most of the block information (the UI is different) , except block header information like block number, block hash etc. I am open to adding a new category maybe 'Wallet Explorers' . Let me know your thoughts