Talk:Firstbits: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Reverting unback claims: new section |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 01:54, 1 May 2013 (GMT) | [[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 01:54, 1 May 2013 (GMT) | ||
: Reverting ''with'' a discussion: I'm not aware of a single developer who disagrees with the position stated. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 05:20, 2 May 2013 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 05:20, 2 May 2013
Reverting unback claims
Reverting claims that
Firstbits is generally considered to be a bad idea because it encourages transaction spam. This position is held by most, if not all, of Bitcoin developers.
"transaction spam" is not a generally accepted meaningful term - any transaction is legitimate. Certainly such a strong claim that presumes to speak on behalf of "most or all of the devs" must be backed by evidence.
Luke-Jr, please do not revert this without a discussion, and do not add the claim with a prefix such as "According to some".