Comparison of mining pools: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BTCMine is currently Score based. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| [[Bitcoin_Pool|Bitcoin Mining Pool]] || USA || 93 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || ? || RPC (+LP) || Unknown || [http://bitcoinpool.com/forum/ Link] || [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/ Link] | | [[Bitcoin_Pool|Bitcoin Mining Pool]] || USA || 93 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || ? || RPC (+LP) || Unknown || [http://bitcoinpool.com/forum/ Link] || [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/ Link] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Bitcoin_Pooled_Mining|Bitcoin Pooled Mining (Slush)]] || | | [[Bitcoin_Pooled_Mining|Bitcoin Pooled Mining (Slush)]] || London || 1139 || Score || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC || 2010-11-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=1976.0 Link] || [http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ Link] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Bitcoins.lc]] || EU || 84 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10121.0 Link] || [http://www.bitcoins.lc/ Link] | | [[Bitcoins.lc]] || EU || 84 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10121.0 Link] || [http://www.bitcoins.lc/ Link] | ||
Revision as of 13:44, 8 June 2011
| Name | Location | Hashrate (GHash/sec)[1][2] | Reward Type | Transaction fees | Fee PPS | Fee Prop / Score | Audits[3] | Protocol | Launched | Forum Thread | Homepage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BitClockers | Unknown | 18 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 2% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-27 | Link | Link |
| Bitcoin Mining Pool | USA | 93 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 0%[4] | ? | RPC (+LP) | Unknown | Link | Link |
| Bitcoin Pooled Mining (Slush) | London | 1139 | Score | kept by pool | - | 2% | ? | RPC | 2010-11-27 | Link | Link |
| Bitcoins.lc | EU | 84 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-27 | Link | Link |
| BTC Guild | USA | 721 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | 0%[5] | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-09 | Link | Link |
| Continuum | Unknown | 8 | PPS / Score | kept by pool | 5% | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-17 | Link | Link |
| DeepBit | Unknown | 2369 | PPS / Prop. | kept by pool | 10% | 3% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-02-26 | Link | Link |
| Eligius | USA / Europe | 150 - EU:43 / USA:106 | Prop. | kept by pool | - | ~0.0003% | Yes[6] | RPC (+LP) | 2011-04-27 | Link | Link |
| Swepool | Sweden | 48 | PPS | kept by pool | 8% | - | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-14 | Link | Link |
| Simplecoin | Unknown | 19 | Prop | kept by pool | - | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-06-02 | Link | Link |
| Mining Team Reddit | USA / Europe | 28 | Prop | kept by pool | - | 0% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-05-25 | Link | Link |
| BTCMine | Unknown | 388 | Score | kept by pool | - | 2% | ? | RPC (+LP) | 2011-03-11 | Link | Link |
- ↑ Hashrate is given in gigahash/second.
- ↑ Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. Note however that it is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics.
- ↑ Auditing can be accomplished by third-parties if the pool publishes proofs-of-work for every share.
- ↑ Donations are possible
- ↑ Donations are possible to unlock features
- ↑ Access to Eligius proofs-of-work is available on request.