Covenants support: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
1440000bytes (talk | contribs)
Editors, Permittors
30 edits
update trey row based on https://gist.github.com/delbonis/14d1802cf4b90439552e61e4cade3a7d/revisions
1440000bytes (talk | contribs)
Editors, Permittors
30 edits
m add space between link and pushpin
Β 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
| {{Acceptable}} || It is a workable solution
| {{Acceptable}} || It is a workable solution
|-
|-
| {{Prefer}} || The best option all things considered
| {{Prefer}} || The most preferred solution (can be used for multiple opcodes to share preference for a combination of opcodes)
|}
|}


Line 49: Line 49:
|-
|-
| 1440000bytes || joinstr || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{No}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || [https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/4777553 πŸ“Œ]
| 1440000bytes || joinstr || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{No}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || [https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/4777553 πŸ“Œ]
|-
| Aaron || sCrypt || {{Weak}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Wanting}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Weak}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Deficient}} || [https://gist.github.com/gitzhou/dc92c41db1987db16fe665c26bc56dd9 πŸ“Œ]
|-
|-
| Alexei Zamyatin || BOB || {{Weak}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} ||[https://github.com/bob-collective/Covernants_Review/blob/main/Alexei.md πŸ“Œ]
| Alexei Zamyatin || BOB || {{Weak}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} ||[https://github.com/bob-collective/Covernants_Review/blob/main/Alexei.md πŸ“Œ]
Line 83: Line 85:
|-
|-
| Weikeng Chen || L2 Iterative || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Weak}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Wanting}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Deficient}} || [https://gist.github.com/weikengchen/25c52dc76bf9ba0aa5852f588b93d348 πŸ“Œ] Β 
| Weikeng Chen || L2 Iterative || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Weak}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Wanting}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Deficient}} || [https://gist.github.com/weikengchen/25c52dc76bf9ba0aa5852f588b93d348 πŸ“Œ] Β 
|-
| xhliu || sCrypt || {{Weak}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Wanting}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Weak}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Deficient}} || [https://scryptplatform.medium.com/evaluating-bitcoin-upgrade-proposals-2df82bfe48df πŸ“Œ]
|-
|-
! colspan="12" style="background-color:#f2f2f2; text-align:center;" | Without a rationale
! colspan="12" style="background-color:#f2f2f2; text-align:center;" | Without a rationale
Line 135: Line 139:
|-
|-
| Steven Roose || Second (Ark) || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{No}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} ||
| Steven Roose || Second (Ark) || {{Prefer}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{No}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Acceptable}} ||
|-
| xhliu || sCrypt || {{Weak}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Wanting}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Weak}} || {{Deficient}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Deficient}} ||
|-
|-
| Yovela Luo || Fiamma || {{No}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} ||
| Yovela Luo || Fiamma || {{No}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Acceptable}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || {{Prefer}} || {{Evaluating}} ||

Latest revision as of 02:38, 22 December 2024


This list is incomplete and under construction. You are strongly encouraged to include a rationale with your evaluation to ensure that your input has maximum impact. Evaluations without accompanying reasoning may be disregarded.


Evaluating Not sure and still evaluating the idea
No Doesn't support
Deficient Okay with the idea, but considers it to have insufficient community support
Weak Better than nothing at all
Wanting Positively likes the idea, but considers it to have insufficient community support
Acceptable It is a workable solution
Prefer The most preferred solution (can be used for multiple opcodes to share preference for a combination of opcodes)

Developers

Developer Affiliation LNHANCE OP_CAT OP_CCV OP_VAULT OP_TXHASH SIGHASH_APO Rationale
OP_CTV OP_CSFS OP_PAIRCOMMIT OP_INTERNALKEY
1440000bytes joinstr Prefer Acceptable No Acceptable Deficient Evaluating Acceptable No No πŸ“Œ
Aaron sCrypt Weak Acceptable Evaluating Wanting Prefer Weak Deficient Acceptable Deficient πŸ“Œ
Alexei Zamyatin BOB Weak Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating πŸ“Œ
arbedout Sigbash Acceptable Wanting Evaluating Wanting Acceptable Evaluating Wanting Wanting Weak πŸ“Œ
benthecarman Taproot Wizards Prefer Prefer Acceptable Prefer Prefer Wanting Wanting Wanting Weak πŸ“Œ
bit Ducat Protocol Prefer Prefer No Evaluating Prefer Prefer No Evaluating Evaluating πŸ“Œ
Ben Zhu Discoco Labs Prefer Acceptable No No Prefer Evaluating Acceptable Wanting No πŸ“Œ
chrisguida Lightning Prefer Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable No Deficient Deficient Deficient Prefer πŸ“Œ
instagibbs Spiral Weak Wanting No Wanting Wanting Evaluating Wanting Wanting Weak πŸ“Œ
jamesob ??? Prefer Prefer Weak Prefer Acceptable Wanting Acceptable Deficient Weak πŸ“Œ
matthewjablack Atomic Finance Prefer Acceptable Weak Acceptable Wanting Evaluating Acceptable Wanting Weak πŸ“Œ
moonsettler LNhance Prefer Prefer Prefer Prefer Wanting Wanting[1] Wanting[1] Wanting Weak πŸ“Œ
Orkun KΔ±lΔ±Γ§ Citrea Acceptable Wanting No No Prefer Evaluating Deficient Prefer Weak πŸ“Œ
ProofOfKeags Alpen Labs Acceptable Prefer No Acceptable Prefer Weak No Prefer Weak πŸ“Œ
Psifour Taproot Wizards Prefer Prefer Weak Acceptable Prefer Deficient Deficient Weak Weak πŸ“Œ
Paul Sztorc Drivechain Acceptable Wanting Weak Wanting Acceptable Evaluating Prefer Deficient Weak πŸ“Œ
Salvatore Ingala MATT Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating πŸ“Œ
Trey Del Bonis Alpen Labs Weak Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Prefer πŸ“Œ
Weikeng Chen L2 Iterative Prefer Prefer Prefer Weak Prefer Wanting Deficient Prefer Deficient πŸ“Œ
xhliu sCrypt Weak Acceptable Evaluating Wanting Prefer Weak Deficient Acceptable Deficient πŸ“Œ
Without a rationale
Abdel StarkWare Acceptable Wanting Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Wanting Evaluating Evaluating Weak
ArminSabouri OP_CAT Acceptable Prefer Evaluating Prefer Prefer Evaluating No Prefer Weak
Cyimon Chen Fiamma No Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating
cryptoquick Surmount Systems Acceptable Prefer Evaluating Prefer Acceptable Evaluating Acceptable Prefer No
Eli Ben-Sasson StarkWare Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating
Ethan Heilman OP_CAT Prefer Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating Prefer Prefer Evaluating
Evan Kaloudis ZEUS Prefer Wanting Weak Acceptable No Acceptable Prefer Deficient Prefer
everythingsats African Bitcoiners Prefer Prefer Acceptable Prefer Acceptable Wanting Prefer Acceptable Acceptable
fi3 DEMAND Wanting Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Deficient Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable
jaybny Sidepit Prefer Prefer Acceptable Prefer Deficient Acceptable Wanting No Acceptable
Jon Atack Bitcoin Core Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating
Kevin He Bitlayer Evaluating Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating
knocte geewallet No Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating No Evaluating No No Prefer
LucidLuckylee ZeroSync No Acceptable No No Weak Evaluating Weak Prefer Weak
Luke Dashjr Bitcoin Knots Acceptable Wanting Evaluating No Deficient Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable
Nick Hansen Luxor Prefer Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating Acceptable Wanting Weak
notasithlord Hydra Host / Turing Games Prefer Prefer Evaluating Wanting Acceptable Evaluating Prefer Evaluating Weak
Mihael Ε inkec sCrypt Weak Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating No Weak Deficient
raphjaph Ordinals Protocol Prefer Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating
reardencode LNHANCE Prefer Prefer Acceptable Prefer Wanting Wanting[1] Wanting[1] Deficient No
Rob Hamilton AnchorWatch Prefer Prefer Wanting Prefer Wanting Evaluating Acceptable Wanting Weak
RobinLinus Stanford / BitVM No Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating No Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Weak
roujiamo bitdollar Weak Acceptable Evaluating Wanting Prefer Weak Deficient Acceptable Deficient
Simanta Gautam Alpen Labs Weak Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Weak Deficient Prefer Weak
Steven Roose Second (Ark) Prefer Prefer Evaluating Deficient Prefer Acceptable No Prefer Acceptable
Yovela Luo Fiamma No Evaluating Evaluating Evaluating Acceptable Evaluating Evaluating Prefer Evaluating
ZmnSCPxj C= Wanting Weak Wanting Wanting Deficient Evaluating Deficient Wanting Wanting
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Only one of CCV and VAULT should be implemented, as they enable nearly identical constructions
Retrieved from "https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Covenants_support&oldid=70503"