Template:Asic/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs)
Editors
831 edits
No edit summary
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs)
Editors
831 edits
No edit summary
 
(30 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== BitFury Group ==
=== infobox ===
( shown on the right )
{{asic
{{asic
|dev=ASICMiner,,Logo-asicminer-en.png
|style=infobox
|codevs=BitQuan,BitFountain
|dev=[[BitFury|BitFury Group]],,Logo-bitfury.png
|chip=BE100,,December 28 2012,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1211518#msg1211518
|codevs=IMEC,Europractice,BioInfoBank Institute
|pics=asic-asicminer-be100-top.jpg:Top,asic-asicminer-be100-bottom.jpg:Bottom
|chip=BF756C55,https://web.archive.org/web/20130709175106/http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/bitfury-55nm-asic-by-reel-july/,June 14th 2013,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677
|mining=0.336Gh:6J@1.05:336,0.392Gh:8J@1.15:392Hz
|datasheet=[http://www.myunivercity.ru/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%8C%D1%8E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B0_Bitfury/221016.html unofficial datasheet] [http://www.onsemi.ru.com/pub_link/Collateral/485AJ.PDF package] [https://mega.co.nz/#!SctDlaJY!TMVG_E6gOVI-MMky8BS0hTy_h-AqpBeVfgrKF_d0J7g pinout] [https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation compilation]
|die=,130nm,,4.66x4.66mm
|pics=Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-top.jpg:Tops/Bottom,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout.jpg:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout2.png:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die optical.jpg:Die (optical),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die power.jpg:Die (power),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die.jpg:Die (cores)
|package=Sawn QFN40,6x6mm,BE100
|mining=5.43Gh:0.38J@0.687V:467Hz,4.77Gh:0.35J@0.65V:410Hz,3.26Gh:0.25J@0.545V:280Hz,2.5Gh:0.21J@0.5V:216Hz
|notes=The letters 'BE' in the component name/markings stands for "Block Erupter".  ASICMiner considers the BE100 their 'Gen1' product.
|die=UMC,55nm,custom+auto,3.8x3.8mm
|sources=Node process, hash rates, core voltages and frequencies<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg1088043#msg1088043</ref> package type, dimensions <ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1211518#msg1211518</ref> die size (note: conflicting data) <ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1072887#msg1072887</ref><ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119668.msg2552365#msg2552365</ref> introduction date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91173.msg1422891#msg1422891</ref>
|package=Sawn/Punched QFN48,7x7mm,'''β''': β / 5Ghash / [date] / [lot] / TT<br />'''BioInfoBank''': BioInfoBank logo / BIB756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]<br />'''CCCP''': CCCP logo / CCCP756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
|miners=Block Erupter USB, Block Erupter Cube, Block Erupter Blade}}
|codes='''β''': KRT8G, '''BioInfoBank''': 1336/KYG0H, 1404/KCKCL, '''CCCP''': 1340/KYW3Q
|notes=BitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.<br />It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>.<br />It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.<br />BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository<ref>https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation</ref>
|sources=date<ref>https://picostocks.com/docs/index/19/page:1</ref>,die size/shrink<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>, foundry/topology<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226846.msg2387673#msg2387673</ref>, performance<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=183368.msg2499516#msg2499516</ref>, IMEC/Europractice<ref>https://picostocks.com/businessplan/19</ref>, codes: 1336/KYG0H<ref>http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img189/3043/eo75.jpg</ref>
}}
 
=== oneliner ===
{{asic
{{asic
|style=compact
|style=oneliner
|dev=ASICMiner,,Logo-asicminer-en.png
|dev=[[BitFury|BitFury Group]],,Logo-bitfury.png
|codevs=BitQuan,BitFountain
|codevs=IMEC,Europractice,BioInfoBank Institute
|chip=unknown,,November 2012,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2246754#msg2246754
|chip=BF756C55,https://web.archive.org/web/20130709175106/http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/bitfury-55nm-asic-by-reel-july/,June 14th 2013,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677
|die=,65nm
|datasheet=[http://www.myunivercity.ru/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%8C%D1%8E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B0_Bitfury/221016.html unofficial datasheet] [http://www.onsemi.ru.com/pub_link/Collateral/485AJ.PDF package] [https://mega.co.nz/#!SctDlaJY!TMVG_E6gOVI-MMky8BS0hTy_h-AqpBeVfgrKF_d0J7g pinout] [https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation compilation]
|notes=This chip would formally have been ASICMiner's 'Gen2' product.
|pics=Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-top.jpg:Tops/Bottom,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout.jpg:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout2.png:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die optical.jpg:Die (optical),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die power.jpg:Die (power),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die.jpg:Die (cores)
|warning=canceled,Development appears to have been canceled prior to production.
|mining=5.43Gh:0.38J@0.687V:467Hz,4.77Gh:0.35J@0.65V:410Hz,3.26Gh:0.25J@0.545V:280Hz,2.5Gh:0.21J@0.5V:216Hz
|sources=Node process<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2246754#msg2246754</ref> date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2788821#msg2788821</ref>}}
|die=UMC,55nm,custom+auto,3.8x3.8mm
|package=Sawn/Punched QFN48,7x7mm,'''β''': β / 5Ghash / [date] / [lot] / TT<br />'''BioInfoBank''': BioInfoBank logo / BIB756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]<br />'''CCCP''': CCCP logo / CCCP756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
|codes='''β''': KRT8G, '''BioInfoBank''': 1336/KYG0H, 1404/KCKCL, '''CCCP''': 1340/KYW3Q
|notes=BitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.<br />It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>.<br />It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.<br />BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository<ref>https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation</ref>
|sources=date<ref>https://picostocks.com/docs/index/19/page:1</ref>,die size/shrink<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>, foundry/topology<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226846.msg2387673#msg2387673</ref>, performance<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=183368.msg2499516#msg2499516</ref>, IMEC/Europractice<ref>https://picostocks.com/businessplan/19</ref>, codes: 1336/KYG0H<ref>http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img189/3043/eo75.jpg</ref>
}}
 
=== miningtable ===
(with surrounding table definition)
<table class="wikitable">
{{asic
{{asic
|dev=ASICMiner,,Logo-asicminer-en.png
|style=miningtable
|codevs=BitQuan,BitFountain
|dev=[[BitFury|BitFury Group]],,Logo-bitfury.png
|chip=BE200,http://www.iasicminer.com/?action-channel-name-param,March 28 2014,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=438359.msg4816701#msg4816701
|codevs=IMEC,Europractice,BioInfoBank Institute
|datasheet=[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=438359.msg4816704#msg4816704 package dimensions],[https://www.dropbox.com/s/o87zbble4z5fkhq/AM%20BE200%20Datasheet%20-%20Google%20Drive.pdf pins/protocol], [https://www.dropbox.com/s/57mnfscjfsti29a/bonding.pdf pinout]
|chip=BF756C55,https://web.archive.org/web/20130709175106/http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/bitfury-55nm-asic-by-reel-july/,June 14th 2013,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677
|pics=asic-asicminer-be200-top.jpg:Top (8x8mm),asic-asicminer-be200-bottom.jpg:Bottom (9x9mm)
|datasheet=[http://www.myunivercity.ru/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%8C%D1%8E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B0_Bitfury/221016.html unofficial datasheet] [http://www.onsemi.ru.com/pub_link/Collateral/485AJ.PDF package] [https://mega.co.nz/#!SctDlaJY!TMVG_E6gOVI-MMky8BS0hTy_h-AqpBeVfgrKF_d0J7g pinout] [https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation compilation]
|mining=9.6Gh:0.66J@0.8V:Hz
|pics=Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-top.jpg:Tops/Bottom,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout.jpg:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout2.png:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die optical.jpg:Die (optical),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die power.jpg:Die (power),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die.jpg:Die (cores)
|die=,40nm,,
|mining=5.43Gh:0.38J@0.687V:467Hz,4.77Gh:0.35J@0.65V:410Hz,3.26Gh:0.25J@0.545V:280Hz,2.5Gh:0.21J@0.5V:216Hz
|package=Sawn QFN64,8x8mm,BE200 / [lot]
|die=UMC,55nm,custom+auto,3.8x3.8mm
|codes=lot:8P01N,9C01H,9P02A,9P02H
|package=Sawn/Punched QFN48,7x7mm,'''β''': β / 5Ghash / [date] / [lot] / TT<br />'''BioInfoBank''': BioInfoBank logo / BIB756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]<br />'''CCCP''': CCCP logo / CCCP756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
|notes=ASICMiner considers this their 'Gen3' product. Was made available in 8x8mm and 9x9mm packages.
|codes='''β''': KRT8G, '''BioInfoBank''': 1336/KYG0H, 1404/KCKCL, '''CCCP''': 1340/KYW3Q
|sources=date<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg5867787#msg5867787</ref>, process/hash/volt/package<ref>http://www.iasicminer.com/?action-channel-name-paramen</ref>,codes: 8P01N<ref>https://i.imgur.com/zklcJJw.jpg</ref>,9C01H<ref>http://s28.postimg.org/56yhs3j4t/20140702_165943.jpg</ref>,9P02A<ref>https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3861/14946454428_c52ba8a940_o.jpg</ref>,9P02H<ref>https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/20141022_161634.jpg</ref>
|notes=BitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.<br />It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>.<br />It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.<br />BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository<ref>https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation</ref>
|miners=ASICMiner Tube, ASICMiner Prisma}}
|sources=date<ref>https://picostocks.com/docs/index/19/page:1</ref>,die size/shrink<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>, foundry/topology<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226846.msg2387673#msg2387673</ref>, performance<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=183368.msg2499516#msg2499516</ref>, IMEC/Europractice<ref>https://picostocks.com/businessplan/19</ref>, codes: 1336/KYG0H<ref>http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img189/3043/eo75.jpg</ref>
}}
</table>
 
=== default ===
{{asic
{{asic
|dev=ASICMiner,,Logo-asicminer-en.png
|dev=[[BitFury|BitFury Group]],,Logo-bitfury.png
|codevs=BitQuan,BitFountain
|codevs=IMEC,Europractice,BioInfoBank Institute
|chip=BE300S prototype,,September 16th 2014,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888260
|chip=BF756C55,https://web.archive.org/web/20130709175106/http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/bitfury-55nm-asic-by-reel-july/,June 14th 2013,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677
|pics=Asic-asicminer-be300_proto-top.jpg:Top,Asic-asicminer-be300_proto-layout.jpg:Layout
|datasheet=[http://www.myunivercity.ru/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%8C%D1%8E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B0_Bitfury/221016.html unofficial datasheet] [http://www.onsemi.ru.com/pub_link/Collateral/485AJ.PDF package] [https://mega.co.nz/#!SctDlaJY!TMVG_E6gOVI-MMky8BS0hTy_h-AqpBeVfgrKF_d0J7g pinout] [https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation compilation]
|mining=3Gh:0.1872J,5.2Gh:0.2469J
|pics=Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-top.jpg:Tops/Bottom,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout.jpg:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-layout2.png:Layout,Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die optical.jpg:Die (optical),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die power.jpg:Die (power),Asic-bitfury-bf756c55-die.jpg:Die (cores)
|die=TSMC,28nm,,
|mining=5.43Gh:0.38J@0.687V:467Hz,4.77Gh:0.35J@0.65V:410Hz,3.26Gh:0.25J@0.545V:280Hz,2.5Gh:0.21J@0.5V:216Hz
|package=Sawn QFN40*,,BE300S
|die=UMC,55nm,custom+auto,3.8x3.8mm
|notes=This was a prototype manufactured on an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-project_wafer_service MPW].  The package appears to be soldered on only 2 sides, which may imply that internally there are also only bond wires to those two sides.
|package=Sawn/Punched QFN48,7x7mm,'''β''': β / 5Ghash / [date] / [lot] / TT<br />'''BioInfoBank''': BioInfoBank logo / BIB756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]<br />'''CCCP''': CCCP logo / CCCP756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
|sources=hash rate/power/node size<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888260.0</ref>, date<ref>https://www.facebook.com/ASICMINER/posts/877699112249400</ref>}}
|codes='''β''': KRT8G, '''BioInfoBank''': 1336/KYG0H, 1404/KCKCL, '''CCCP''': 1340/KYW3Q
{{asic
|notes=BitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.<br />It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>.<br />It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.<br />BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository<ref>https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation</ref>
|style=compact
|sources=date<ref>https://picostocks.com/docs/index/19/page:1</ref>,die size/shrink<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831</ref>, foundry/topology<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226846.msg2387673#msg2387673</ref>, performance<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=183368.msg2499516#msg2499516</ref>, IMEC/Europractice<ref>https://picostocks.com/businessplan/19</ref>, codes: 1336/KYG0H<ref>http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img189/3043/eo75.jpg</ref>
|dev=ASICMiner,,Logo-asicminer-en.png
}}
|codevs=BitQuan,BitFountain
 
|chip=BE300(S),,February 2015,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888260
== References ==
|die=TSMC,28nm,,
|package=FCLGA,5x5mm
|mining=8Gh:(0.3/8)J@0.7V,12Gh:(0.3/8)J@0.7V,6Gh:(0.2/6)J@0.55V,9Gh:(0.2/9)J@0.55V,
|warning=vaporware,The BE300(S) is understood not to be in production at this time.
|notes=ASICMiner would consider this their 'Gen4' product.  The expected hashing performance and package size is preliminary.
|sources=date/hash rate/power/package/node size<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=833704.msg9678661#msg9678661</ref><ref>https://www.bikeji.com/t/165#comment_1088</ref>, package size<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888260.msg9884883#msg9884883</ref>}}
{{asic
|style=compact
|dev=ASICMiner,,Logo-asicminer-en.png
|codevs=BitQuan,BitFountain
|chip=,,2015,
|die=,16nm,,
|warning=future,This chip is planned to be introduced in the future.
|notes=The planned node size would be [https://www.facebook.com/ASICMINER/posts/877699112249400 16nm or 14nm]
|sources=node size<ref>https://www.facebook.com/ASICMINER/posts/877699112249400</ref>}}
<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 19:27, 12 April 2015

BitFury Group

infobox

( shown on the right )

Tops/Bottom
BF756C55
FacilitatorsIMEC,Europractice,BioInfoBank Institute
Introduced2013-Jun-14
Mining
Gh/sJ/GhMh/JVMHz
5.430.3826320.687467
4.770.3528570.65410
3.260.2540000.545280
2.50.2147620.5216
PackageSawn/Punched QFN48 7x7mm
Markingsβ: β / 5Ghash / [date] / [lot] / TT
BioInfoBank: BioInfoBank logo / BIB756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
CCCP: CCCP logo / CCCP756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
Known codesβ: KRT8G, BioInfoBank: 1336/KYG0H, 1404/KCKCL, CCCP: 1340/KYW3Q
Die3.8x3.8mm@55nm(custom+auto)
FoundryUMC
Datasheetunofficial datasheet package pinout compilation
NotesBitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.
It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm[1].
It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.
BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository[2]

oneliner

BitFury Group BF756C55wwwBCT[media: a b c d e f] a 2013-Jun-14 55nm 5.43Gh/s 0.38J/Gh chip co-developed with IMEC,Europractice,BioInfoBank Institute. BitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm.It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository

miningtable

(with surrounding table definition)

BitFury GroupBF756C555.430.3826320.6874672.063411.630.387820.43
BitFury GroupBF756C554.770.3528570.654101.669511.630.336869.88
BitFury GroupBF756C553.260.2540000.5452800.81511.640.234695.14
BitFury GroupBF756C552.50.2147620.52160.52511.570.173600.57

default


BitFury Group
Facilitators: IMEC,Europractice,BioInfoBank Institute
Tops/Bottom
Tops/Bottom
Layout
Layout
Layout
Layout
Die (optical)
Die (optical)
Die (power)
Die (power)
Die (cores)
Die (cores)
BF756C55www BCT
Introduced: 2013-Jun-14
Datasheet: unofficial datasheet package pinout compilation
Technical specifications
Package: Sawn/Punched QFN48 7x7mm
Markings: β: β / 5Ghash / [date] / [lot] / TT
BioInfoBank: BioInfoBank logo / BIB756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
CCCP: CCCP logo / CCCP756C55NM-BF / [date] / [lot]
Known codes: β: KRT8G, BioInfoBank: 1336/KYG0H, 1404/KCKCL, CCCP: 1340/KYW3Q
Die:3.8x3.8mm@55nm(custom+auto)
Foundry: UMC
Gh/sJ/GhMh/JVMHzWh/HzGh/mm²η-factor
5.430.3826320.6874672.063411.630.387820.43
4.770.3528570.654101.669511.630.336869.88
3.260.2540000.5452800.81511.640.234695.14
2.50.2147620.52160.52511.570.173600.57
Notes: BitFury Group considers this their Gen 1, Rev 1 product.
It was originally designed at 65nm but die-shrunk down to 55nm[5].
It was widely released in at least 3 different packages/markings: The 'beta' / 5Ghash (estimated hash rate before practical tests) markings on a sawn package, BioInfoBank and CCCP markings on a punched package.
BitcoinTalk user vs3 holds a large collection of technical information about this chip in his NanoFury repository[6]

References

  1. ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831
  2. ↑ https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation
  3. ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831
  4. ↑ https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation
  5. ↑ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=228677.msg2408831#msg2408831
  6. ↑ https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury/wiki/The-missing-bitfury-chip-documentation
Retrieved from "https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Template:Asic/sandbox&oldid=56060"