User talk:Giszmo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Wiki Cleanup: new section |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If anyone ever offers to pay you to do this, let me know. I'll help out for free. I agree that the wiki needs some cleaning up and I also work fairly extensively with wiki's. [[User:Zellfaze|Zellfaze]] 01:52, 25 January 2012 (GMT) | If anyone ever offers to pay you to do this, let me know. I'll help out for free. I agree that the wiki needs some cleaning up and I also work fairly extensively with wiki's. [[User:Zellfaze|Zellfaze]] 01:52, 25 January 2012 (GMT) | ||
: Hi Zellfaze, I updated my user page referring to you as I have no time. [[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] 13:35, 26 January 2012 (GMT) | |||
== table == | |||
If there isn't another column for affiliation you can't sort by it, I think that is unfortunate. Also, you're going to have people listing "core" as an affiliation even if they're not even involved with the project, and I think that defeats the purpose of the column. --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 05:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
: What? *lookingAroundConfused* Did you want to message me? LukeJr introduced the affiliate column and I have no idea why the headline spans two columns. Funny also that the code comment asks to add people alphabetically by last name, while some don't feature such a thing and sorting by it isn't possible neither. Whatever. I'd only wish that more devs would speak up on the matter. Don't get stuff done with this intensifying drama. --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo|talk]]) 22:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:09, 12 June 2017
Wiki Cleanup
If anyone ever offers to pay you to do this, let me know. I'll help out for free. I agree that the wiki needs some cleaning up and I also work fairly extensively with wiki's. Zellfaze 01:52, 25 January 2012 (GMT)
- Hi Zellfaze, I updated my user page referring to you as I have no time. Giszmo 13:35, 26 January 2012 (GMT)
table
If there isn't another column for affiliation you can't sort by it, I think that is unfortunate. Also, you're going to have people listing "core" as an affiliation even if they're not even involved with the project, and I think that defeats the purpose of the column. --Gmaxwell (talk) 05:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- What? *lookingAroundConfused* Did you want to message me? LukeJr introduced the affiliate column and I have no idea why the headline spans two columns. Funny also that the code comment asks to add people alphabetically by last name, while some don't feature such a thing and sorting by it isn't possible neither. Whatever. I'd only wish that more devs would speak up on the matter. Don't get stuff done with this intensifying drama. --Giszmo (talk) 22:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)