Controlled supply: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Zgalli (talk | contribs)
TheRealSteve (talk | contribs)
Line 60: Line 60:
Because the number of bitcoins created each time a user discovers a new block - the block reward - is halved based on a fixed interval of blocks, and the time it takes on average to discover a block can vary based on [[mining]] power and the network [[difficulty]], the exact time when the block reward is halved can vary as well.  Consequently, the time the last Bitcoin will be created will also vary, and is subject to speculation based on assumptions.
Because the number of bitcoins created each time a user discovers a new block - the block reward - is halved based on a fixed interval of blocks, and the time it takes on average to discover a block can vary based on [[mining]] power and the network [[difficulty]], the exact time when the block reward is halved can vary as well.  Consequently, the time the last Bitcoin will be created will also vary, and is subject to speculation based on assumptions.


If the mining power had remained constant since the first Bitcoin was mined, the last Bitcoin would have been mined on October 8th, 2140.  Due to the mining power having increased overall over time, as of block NNNNNN, assuming mining power remains constant at that point, the last Bitcoin would be mined on May 19th, 2140.
If the mining power had remained constant since the first Bitcoin was mined, the last Bitcoin would have been mined on October 8th, 2140.  Due to the mining power having increased overall over time, as of block 367,500 - assuming mining power remains constant from that block forward - the last Bitcoin would be mined on May 7th, 2140.


As it is very difficulty to predict how mining power will evolve going into the future - i.e. whether technological progress will continue to make hardware faster or whether mining will hit a a technological wall, or whether or not faster methods of calculation will be discovered - putting an exact date or even year on this event is difficult as well.
As it is very difficulty to predict how mining power will evolve going into the future - i.e. whether technological progress will continue to make hardware faster or whether mining will hit a a technological wall, or whether or not faster methods of calculation will be discovered - putting an exact date or even year on this event is difficult as well.

Revision as of 21:59, 30 July 2015

A fixed money supply, or a supply altered only in accord with objective and calculable criteria, is a necessary condition to a meaningful just price of money.[1]

Fr. Bernard W. Dempsey, S.J. (1903-1960)

In a centralized economy, currency is issued by a central bank at a rate that is supposed to match the growth of the amount of goods that are exchanged so that these goods can be traded with stable prices. The monetary base is controlled by a central bank. In the United States, the Fed increases the monetary base by issuing currency, increasing the amount banks have on reserve, and more recently, printing money electronically in a process called Quantitative Easing.

In a fully decentralized monetary system, there is no central authority that regulates the monetary base. Instead, currency is created by the nodes of a peer-to-peer network. The Bitcoin generation algorithm defines, in advance, how currency will be created and at what rate. Any currency that is generated by a malicious user that does not follow the rules will be rejected by the network and thus is worthless.

Currency with Finite Supply

Block reward halving
Controlled supply

Bitcoins are created each time a user discovers a new block. The rate of block creation is approximately constant over time: 6 per hour. The number of bitcoins generated per block is set to decrease geometrically, with a 50% reduction every four years. The result is that the number of bitcoins in existence will never exceed 21 million.[2] Speculated justifications for the unintuitive value "21 million" are: it matches a 4-year reward halving schedule; or the ultimate total number of Satoshis that will be mined is close to the maximum capacity of a 64-bit floating point number.

This decreasing-supply algorithm was chosen because it approximates the rate at which commodities like gold are mined. Users who use their computers to perform calculations to try and discover a block are thus called Miners.

Projected Bitcoins Short Term

This chart shows the number of bitcoins that will exist in the near future. The Year is a forecast and may be slightly off.

Date reached Block Reward Era BTC/block Year (estimate) Start BTC BTC Added End BTC BTC Increase End BTC % of Limit
2009-01-03 0 1 50.00 2009 0 2625000 2625000 infinite 12.500%
2010-04-22 52500 1 50.00 2010 2625000 2625000 5250000 100.00% 25.000%
2011-01-28 105000 1 50.00 2011 5250000 2625000 7875000 50.00% 37.500%
2011-12-14 157500 1 50.00 2012 7875000 2625000 10500000 33.33% 50.000%
2012-11-28 210000 2 25.00 2013 10500000 1312500 11812500 12.50% 56.250%
2013-10-09 262500 2 25.00 2014 11812500 1312500 13125000 11.11% 62.500%
2014-08-11 315000 2 25.00 2015 13125000 1312500 14437500 10.00% 68.750%
2015-07-29 367500 2 25.00 2016 14437500 1312500 15750000 9.09% 75.000%
420000 3 12.50 2017 15750000 656250 16406250 4.17% 78.125%
472500 3 12.50 2018 16406250 656250 17062500 4.00% 81.250%
525000 3 12.50 2019 17062500 656250 17718750 3.85% 84.375%
577500 3 12.50 2020 17718750 656250 18375000 3.70% 87.500%
630000 4 6.25 2021 18375000 328125 18703125 1.79% 89.063%
682500 4 6.25 2022 18703125 328125 19031250 1.75% 90.625%
735000 4 6.25 2023 19031250 328125 19359375 1.72% 92.188%
787500 4 6.25 2024 19359375 328125 19687500 1.69% 93.750%

Projected Bitcoins Long Term

Supply timeline estimation

Because the number of bitcoins created each time a user discovers a new block - the block reward - is halved based on a fixed interval of blocks, and the time it takes on average to discover a block can vary based on mining power and the network difficulty, the exact time when the block reward is halved can vary as well. Consequently, the time the last Bitcoin will be created will also vary, and is subject to speculation based on assumptions.

If the mining power had remained constant since the first Bitcoin was mined, the last Bitcoin would have been mined on October 8th, 2140. Due to the mining power having increased overall over time, as of block 367,500 - assuming mining power remains constant from that block forward - the last Bitcoin would be mined on May 7th, 2140.

As it is very difficulty to predict how mining power will evolve going into the future - i.e. whether technological progress will continue to make hardware faster or whether mining will hit a a technological wall, or whether or not faster methods of calculation will be discovered - putting an exact date or even year on this event is difficult as well.

The total number of bitcoins, as mentioned earlier, will tend toward 21 million. Due to a technical limitation in the data structure of the blockchain - specifically of the transaction output, this exact value is 20,999,999.9769 bitcoin. Should this technical limitation is adjusted, the total number will still only be a maximum of 21 million.

Block Reward Era BTC/block Year Start BTC BTC Added End BTC BTC Increase End BTC % of Limit
0 1 50.00000000 2009.007 0.00000000 10500000.00000000 10500000.00000000 infinite 50.00000006%
210000 2 25.00000000 2013.000 10500000.00000000 5250000.00000000 15750000.00000000 50.00000000% 75.00000008%
420000 3 12.50000000 2016.993 15750000.00000000 2625000.00000000 18375000.00000000 16.66666667% 87.50000010%
630000 4 6.25000000 2020.986 18375000.00000000 1312500.00000000 19687500.00000000 7.14285714% 93.75000010%
840000 5 3.12500000 2024.978 19687500.00000000 656250.00000000 20343750.00000000 3.33333333% 96.87500011%
1050000 6 1.56250000 2028.971 20343750.00000000 328125.00000000 20671875.00000000 1.61290323% 98.43750011%
1260000 7 0.78125000 2032.964 20671875.00000000 164062.50000000 20835937.50000000 0.79365079% 99.21875011%
1470000 8 0.39062500 2036.956 20835937.50000000 82031.25000000 20917968.75000000 0.39370079% 99.60937511%
1680000 9 0.19531250 2040.949 20917968.75000000 41015.62500000 20958984.37500000 0.19607843% 99.80468761%
1890000 10 0.09765625 2044.942 20958984.37500000 20507.81250000 20979492.18750000 0.09784736% 99.90234386%
2100000 11 0.04882812 2048.934 20979492.18750000 10253.90520000 20989746.09270000 0.04887585% 99.95117198%
2310000 12 0.02441406 2052.927 20989746.09270000 5126.95260000 20994873.04530000 0.02442599% 99.97558604%
2520000 13 0.01220703 2056.920 20994873.04530000 2563.47630000 20997436.52160000 0.01221001% 99.98779307%
2730000 14 0.00610351 2060.913 20997436.52160000 1281.73710000 20998718.25870000 0.00610426% 99.99389658%
2940000 15 0.00305175 2064.905 20998718.25870000 640.86750000 20999359.12620000 0.00305194% 99.99694833%
3150000 16 0.00152587 2068.898 20999359.12620000 320.43270000 20999679.55890000 0.00152592% 99.99847420%
3360000 17 0.00076293 2072.891 20999679.55890000 160.21530000 20999839.77420000 0.00076294% 99.99923713%
3570000 18 0.00038146 2076.883 20999839.77420000 80.10660000 20999919.88080000 0.00038146% 99.99961859%
3780000 19 0.00019073 2080.876 20999919.88080000 40.05330000 20999959.93410000 0.00019073% 99.99980932%
3990000 20 0.00009536 2084.869 20999959.93410000 20.02560000 20999979.95970000 0.00009536% 99.99990468%
4200000 21 0.00004768 2088.861 20999979.95970000 10.01280000 20999989.97250000 0.00004768% 99.99995236%
4410000 22 0.00002384 2092.854 20999989.97250000 5.00640000 20999994.97890000 0.00002384% 99.99997620%
4620000 23 0.00001192 2096.847 20999994.97890000 2.50320000 20999997.48210000 0.00001192% 99.99998812%
4830000 24 0.00000596 2100.840 20999997.48210000 1.25160000 20999998.73370000 0.00000596% 99.99999408%
5040000 25 0.00000298 2104.832 20999998.73370000 0.62580000 20999999.35950000 0.00000298% 99.99999706%
5250000 26 0.00000149 2108.825 20999999.35950000 0.31290000 20999999.67240000 0.00000149% 99.99999855%
5460000 27 0.00000074 2112.818 20999999.67240000 0.15540000 20999999.82780000 0.00000074% 99.99999929%
5670000 28 0.00000037 2116.810 20999999.82780000 0.07770000 20999999.90550000 0.00000037% 99.99999966%
5880000 29 0.00000018 2120.803 20999999.90550000 0.03780000 20999999.94330000 0.00000018% 99.99999984%
6090000 30 0.00000009 2124.796 20999999.94330000 0.01890000 20999999.96220000 0.00000009% 99.99999993%
6300000 31 0.00000004 2128.788 20999999.96220000 0.00840000 20999999.97060000 0.00000004% 99.99999997%
6510000 32 0.00000002 2132.781 20999999.97060000 0.00420000 20999999.97480000 0.00000002% 99.99999999%
6720000 33 0.00000001 2136.774 20999999.97480000 0.00210000 20999999.97690000 0.00000001% 100.00000000%
6930000 34 0.00000000 2140.767 20999999.97690000 0.00000000 20999999.97690000 0.00000000% 100.00000000%

Note: The number of bitcoins are presented in a floating point format. However, these values are based on the number of satoshi per block originally in integer format to prevent compounding error.

Spendable Supply

The theoretical total number of bitcoins, 21 million, should not be confused with the total spendable supply. The total spendable supply is always lower than the theoretical total supply, and is subject to accidental loss, willful destruction, and technical peculiarities.

Loss of bitcoin

Bitcoins may be lost if the conditions required to spend them are no longer known. For example, if you made a transaction to an address that requires a private key in order to spend those bitcoins further, had written that private key down on a piece of paper, but that piece of paper was lost. In this case, that bitcoin may also be considered lost, as the odds of randomly finding a matching private key are such that it is generally considered impossible.

Willful destruction of bitcoin

Bitcoins may also be willfully 'destroyed' - for example by attaching conditions that make it impossible to spend them.

A common method is to send bitcoin to an address that was constructed and only made to pass validity checks, but for which no private key is actually known. An example of such an address is "1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE", where the last "f59kuE" is text to make the preceding constructed text pass validation. Finding a matching private key is, again, generally considered impossible. For an example of how difficult this would be, see Vanitygen.

Another common method is to send bitcoin in a transaction where the conditions for spending are not just unfathomably unlikely, but literally impossible to meet. For example, a transaction that is made provably unspendable using OP_RETURN, or uses script operations that requires the user to prove that 1+1 equals 3.

A lesser known method is to send bitcoin to an address based on private key that is outside the range of valid ECDSA private keys. For example, the address 16QaFeudRUt8NYy2yzjm3BMvG4xBbAsBFM has a known matching private key of value 0 (zero), which is outside the valid range.

Technical peculiarities preventing spending of bitcoin

There are also technical peculiarities that prevent the spending of some bitcoin.

The first ₿50, included in the genesis block, cannot be spent as its transaction is not in the global database.

In older versions of the bitcoin reference code, a miner could make their coinbase transaction (block reward) have the exact same ID as used in a previous block[3]. This effectively caused the previous block reward to become unspendable. Two known such cases[4][5] are left as special cases in the code[6] as part of BIP 0030 changes that fixed this issue. These transactions were ₿50 each.

Money Supply

While the number of bitcoins in existence will never exceed 21 million, the money supply of bitcoins can exceed 21 million due to Fractional-reserve Banking.

Deflation

Because the monetary base of bitcoins cannot be expanded, the currency would be subject to severe deflation if it becomes widely used. Keynesian economists argue that deflation is bad for an economy because it incentivises individuals and businesses to save money rather than invest in businesses and create jobs. The Austrian school of thought counters this criticism, claiming that as deflation occurs in all stages of production, entrepreneurs who invest benefit from it. As a result, profit ratios tend to stay the same and only their magnitudes change. In other words, in a deflationary environment, goods and services decrease in price, but at the same time the cost for the production of these goods and services tend to decrease proportionally, effectively not affecting profits. Price deflation encourages an increase in hoarding — hence savings — which in turn tends to lower interest rates and increase the incentive for entrepreneurs to invest in projects of longer term.

See also

References

  1. Interest and Usury p. 220 by Fr. Bernard W. Dempsey, S.J. (1903-1960); cf. John Horvat II Return to Order ch. 37 "The Backing of Money"
  2. 21 million cap
  3. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/612
  4. Transaction e3bf3d07d4b0375638d5f1db5255fe07ba2c4cb067cd81b84ee974b6585fb468 - used in blocks 91722 and 91880.
  5. {{cite tx|d5d27987d2a3dfc724e359870c6644b40e497bdc0589a033220fe15429d88599|used in blocks 91812 and 91842
  6. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/ab91bf39b7c11e9c86bb2043c24f0f377f1cf514