User talk:Taras

From Bitcoin Wiki
Revision as of 06:41, 8 March 2015 by Theymos (talk | contribs) (Dokuwiki revisions: new section)
Jump to: navigation, search
2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 20132014

Bitcoin Fog

Could you remove bitcoin fog advertisment from bitcoin wiki, because it scammed a lot of people? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pampa (talkcontribs) at 20:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)‎

See Talk:Bitcoin Fog --Taras (talk) 21:36, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Can you at least consult with me

...before editing "every" thing I write. Isn't that the point of this being a community wiki and not a centralized wiki?

Why did you rename the PS Coin page (see how I'm consulting first before just undo-ing)?

Additionally, I changed the "planned" template you edited back to "soon" which I originally had made - there is a very literal distinction between those words. Planned would imply uncertainty. We've already tackled the sufficient regulatory hurdles necessary, minus one additional step which we're in the process of completing now.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bliljerk101 (talkcontribs) at 23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Is PS Coin really called "PS Coin - incentivized exchange"? They write that down as their name all the time? If it is, go ahead and put it back.
I just feel the distinction would help in this case, since it's radically different than other exchanges (no other exchanges have an incentivized algorithm like PS Coin - it really should be in a category of its own) Bliljerk101 (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Also, "Planned" does not imply uncertainty. It is only used when implementation is imminent. Taras (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
"Planned" implies the inherent uncertainty of any future event. Until it happens, it is always uncertain. --Luke-jr (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Do you think we should keep the "soon" template or otherwise distinguish scheduled implementations from dry internal speculation? Taras (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Luke-jr, Thanks for your input here. Taras, I think there is no reason to not keep both templates. However, in the case of PS Coin the "Soon" template should be used. Other exchanges may appropriately need to use a "planned" template instead. Bliljerk101 (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Dokuwiki revisions

One thing that might cause trouble: Mark started and tried to get everyone to move to it, but there was a period of time when it was uncertain whether the community would want to switch from the old wiki to this one, so the two wikis competed for a time (perhaps as long as a month or two). Therefore, there might be some edit conflicts that can't be easily resolved. Then again, both wikis had very low activity at the time, so maybe there won't be any conflicts. theymos (talk) 06:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)