Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sgornick"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Add response to Vladgiurgiubv.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)==
 
  Trade‎; 05:20 . . (-71) . . Sgornick (Talk | contribs)‎ (→Getting started:  Remove BTCBase, this is wiki is generally for english-only sites. There are separate wikis for other languages.)
 
  Trade‎; 05:20 . . (-71) . . Sgornick (Talk | contribs)‎ (→Getting started:  Remove BTCBase, this is wiki is generally for english-only sites. There are separate wikis for other languages.)
 
Yet Bitomat is not available in English... what's the difference here? --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)
 
Yet Bitomat is not available in English... what's the difference here? --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)
Line 4: Line 5:
 
Good point, Luke-jr.  Unfortunately, they don't belong on the trade page for another reason -- they are info only, they have no trade.  Otherwise I would add them back in somewhere.
 
Good point, Luke-jr.  Unfortunately, they don't belong on the trade page for another reason -- they are info only, they have no trade.  Otherwise I would add them back in somewhere.
  
 +
==13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)==
 
Mr. Sgornick I thought this was a good idea. I don't understand how it hurts the community?!(I don't see the reasons in deleting them.) I made my contributions (Introduced 4-5 bitcoin-related sites and wrote some descriptions). The users don't have anything to loose and the BTC I make out of this I intend to spend on bitcoindeals.com (after I get an invitation). Isn't there a way I can leave those links there? We have the same rights on this wiki so I hope we can disscus this with respect and consideration.
 
Mr. Sgornick I thought this was a good idea. I don't understand how it hurts the community?!(I don't see the reasons in deleting them.) I made my contributions (Introduced 4-5 bitcoin-related sites and wrote some descriptions). The users don't have anything to loose and the BTC I make out of this I intend to spend on bitcoindeals.com (after I get an invitation). Isn't there a way I can leave those links there? We have the same rights on this wiki so I hope we can disscus this with respect and consideration.
 
--[[User:Vladgiurgiubv|Vladgiurgiubv]] 13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)
 
--[[User:Vladgiurgiubv|Vladgiurgiubv]] 13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)
 +
 +
Vladgiurgiubv, It was an unwritten but generally accepted rule that no affiliate / referral links should be included in the wiki for a number of reasons.  The [[BitcoinWiki:Rules|[policy]] does now exist though.

Revision as of 21:14, 10 August 2011

06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)

Trade‎; 05:20 . . (-71) . . Sgornick (Talk | contribs)‎ (→Getting started:  Remove BTCBase, this is wiki is generally for english-only sites. There are separate wikis for other languages.)

Yet Bitomat is not available in English... what's the difference here? --Luke-jr 06:22, 4 August 2011 (GMT)

Good point, Luke-jr. Unfortunately, they don't belong on the trade page for another reason -- they are info only, they have no trade. Otherwise I would add them back in somewhere.

13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)

Mr. Sgornick I thought this was a good idea. I don't understand how it hurts the community?!(I don't see the reasons in deleting them.) I made my contributions (Introduced 4-5 bitcoin-related sites and wrote some descriptions). The users don't have anything to loose and the BTC I make out of this I intend to spend on bitcoindeals.com (after I get an invitation). Isn't there a way I can leave those links there? We have the same rights on this wiki so I hope we can disscus this with respect and consideration. --Vladgiurgiubv 13:13, 10 August 2011 (GMT)

Vladgiurgiubv, It was an unwritten but generally accepted rule that no affiliate / referral links should be included in the wiki for a number of reasons. The [policy does now exist though.