Difference between revisions of "User talk:Luke-jr"
(→Reverted your edit on Alt-chain release RFC: new section) |
(→Reverted your edit on Alt-chain release RFC) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 17:53, 19 August 2012 (GMT) | [[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 17:53, 19 August 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your recent edits on litecoin are interesting lukeJnr. | ||
| + | I'm concerned that you consider litecoin a threat to bitcoin rather than something which improves the overall system of electronic payments. | ||
| + | The biggest threat to bitcoin as a network is actually terracoin. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:laSeek|laSeek]] ([[User talk:laSeek|talk]]) | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 18 December 2012
Reverted your edit on Alt-chain release RFC
I think your edit is anti-competitive, and is against the spirit in which I drafted the RFC. You can write a paragraph that encourages working within the boundaries of Bitcoin, but it must accept the possibility of deciding to create a real, competing alt coin. I also disapprove of you deleting the exchanges section.
Ripper234 (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2012 (GMT)
Your recent edits on litecoin are interesting lukeJnr. I'm concerned that you consider litecoin a threat to bitcoin rather than something which improves the overall system of electronic payments. The biggest threat to bitcoin as a network is actually terracoin.
