Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of address prefixes"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
--[[User:gidgreen|gidgreen]] 7 July 2014 (GMT)
 
--[[User:gidgreen|gidgreen]] 7 July 2014 (GMT)
  
* I'm not sure what you mean by that. Altcoins abusing bitcoin's blockchain are still altcoins. Also note that the version byte is for a version, not a namespace. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 20:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
+
* I'm not sure what you mean by that. Altcoins abusing bitcoin's blockchain are still altcoins. Also note that the version byte is for a version, not a namespace. CoinSpark seems to be inserting a "features" in the address. It makes sense to have this, I think, but it should be based on version 5 addresses (p2sh), not the obsolete version 0 (p2pkh)... --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 20:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:45, 7 July 2014

Shouldn't the line 128 5 Bitcoin Private key 5Htn3FzuH3b1X5VF2zLTsAQzBcyzkZNJsa2egXN8ZFJTCqQm3Rq be 128 t Bitcoin Private key tHtn3FzuH3b1X5VF2zLTsAQzBcyzkZNJsa2egXN8ZFJTCqQm3Rq according to 127-128 t 34 ? --ThePiachu (talk) 01:59, 27 June 2012 (GMT)

What is the policy regarding addresses which are not altcoins but which relate to protocols being built on top of bitcoin? I think there is value in some kind of registry for such protocols to prevent address clashes, and help users know the purpose of different addresses. But I don't want to overstep if that's not the purpose of this page. --gidgreen 7 July 2014 (GMT)

  • I'm not sure what you mean by that. Altcoins abusing bitcoin's blockchain are still altcoins. Also note that the version byte is for a version, not a namespace. CoinSpark seems to be inserting a "features" in the address. It makes sense to have this, I think, but it should be based on version 5 addresses (p2sh), not the obsolete version 0 (p2pkh)... --Luke-jr (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)