Difference between revisions of "Talk:BlockExplorer.com"
(Created page with "Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches?") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? | Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? | ||
| + | :I thought about it, but I decided that 300 is meant for different formats of the same data. From the RFC: "The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of '''representations'''". [[User:Theymos|theymos]] 04:01, 24 January 2011 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 04:01, 24 January 2011
Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches?
- I thought about it, but I decided that 300 is meant for different formats of the same data. From the RFC: "The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of representations". theymos 04:01, 24 January 2011 (GMT)
